Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Nicole Uhre-Balk
100% support rate
Top opponent
Tina Mulally
12% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in South Dakota

Legislators moving environment in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
100% 24
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Strong +
100% 21
Scott Odenbach
Scott Odenbach House · District 31
R
Strong +
100% 22
Mary Fitzgerald
Mary Fitzgerald House · District 31
R
Strong +
100% 21
Marty Overweg
Marty Overweg House · District 21
R
Strong +
92% 32
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Strong −
12% 18
Aaron Aylward
Aaron Aylward House · District 6
R
Oppose
25% 20
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
29% 20
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Oppose
29% 21
Logan Manhart
Logan Manhart House · District 1
R
Mixed −
43% 21
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All environment bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 222: make an appropriation for eligible water, wastewater, storm water, and riparian buffer initiative projects and to declare an emergency.

SB 222 appropriates $10 million from South Dakota's general fund to the Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources for grants supporting water, wastewater, storm water, and nonpoint source pollution projects. It directly affects municipalities and water systems serving residents, with funding calculated as a percentage of project costs based on population: up to 80% for systems serving ≤1,000 people (capped at $9,000/person), 50% for 1,001-2,500 people ($7,000/person), and 30% for >2,500 people ($3,000/person). Projects addressing regionalization, drought resiliency, or environmental compliance may exceed these caps, and engineering studies for long-term water issues can receive up to 100% funding. The bill declares an emergency to expedite funding and requires projects to align with the state water plan.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 231: create the water infrastructure development fund, to provide an appropriation, to provide for the awarding of grants and loans from the fund for certain rural water projects and to declare an emergency.

SB 231 creates a Water Infrastructure Development Fund to support rural water projects in South Dakota. The fund, initially seeded with $3 million from the state general fund (Section 2), provides grants (up to 10% of project costs) and loans (up to 50% of project costs) managed by the Board of Water and Natural Resources (Section 1). It directly affects rural communities needing upgrades to water infrastructure, such as new systems or repairs. The bill declares an emergency to allow immediate implementation upon passage (Section 3).
signed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 12, 2026

SB 38: modify the annual fee imposed on certain concentrated animal feeding operations.

SB 38 increases annual fees for certain concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) in South Dakota that process manure or wastewater under water pollution permits. It raises fees per animal for specific livestock, including dairy cows ($0.43 from $0.17), other cattle/bison ($0.30 from $0.12), and horses ($0.60 from $0.24). The bill directly affects CAFOs operating under water pollution control permits, excluding livestock auctions, out-of-state operations, and Indian country. The changes modify existing fee rates in Section 34A-2-125.1 of South Dakota law.
in committee · South Dakota · House Feb 2, 2026

HB 1103: require that annual withdrawal of groundwater from any groundwater source may not exceed the annual recharge of water to the groundwater source.

HB 1103 requires that any annual withdrawal of groundwater from a source cannot exceed the natural annual recharge rate of that source. The bill amends groundwater appropriation rules to prohibit approving new water rights if withdrawal would exceed recharge, based on available data. It directly affects applicants seeking groundwater rights, including agricultural users, municipalities, and industries. An exception allows withdrawals exceeding recharge for older groundwater formations used by public water systems.