Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
5
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Erik Muckey
95% support rate
Top opponent
John Carley
21% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving criminal justice in South Dakota

Legislators moving criminal justice in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Strong +
95% 19
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
88% 17
Ernie Otten
Ernie Otten Senate · District 6
R
Strong +
86% 14
Jack Kolbeck
Jack Kolbeck House · District 13
R
Strong +
85% 20
Erin Healy
Erin Healy House · District 10
D
Strong +
82% 17
John Carley
John Carley Senate · District 29
R
Oppose
21% 14
Taffy Howard
Taffy Howard Senate · District 34
R
Oppose
23% 13
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Oppose
24% 17
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
24% 21
Heather Baxter
Heather Baxter House · District 34
R
Oppose
24% 21
Showing 5 of 5 bills

All criminal justice bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 42: enhance the penalties for ingestion, possession with intent to deliver, and delivery of a controlled substance in a state correctional facility.

SB 42 increases penalties for possessing, delivering, or ingesting controlled substances within South Dakota state correctional facilities. It changes inmate possession of controlled substances from a Class 3 to a Class 4 felony, delivery to inmates from a Class 4 to a Class 3 felony, and ingestion by inmates from a Class 6 to a Class 5 felony. These changes directly affect inmates, staff, and visitors who bring or use controlled substances in prisons. The bill strengthens criminal penalties for drug-related activities in correctional settings without altering treatment programs.
signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 179: permit a court to commit a juvenile adjudicated delinquent for certain weapons offenses to the Department of Corrections.

SB 179 allows South Dakota courts to commit juveniles adjudicated delinquent for specific weapons offenses to the Department of Corrections, but only under strict conditions. It applies when no other viable alternative exists, corrections is the least restrictive option, and the juvenile was convicted of certain weapons offenses (like those under §22-14-5, 22-14-7, 22-14-20, or 23-7-44). The court must also find the juvenile poses a significant risk of physical harm, has prior adjudications for separate offenses, or meets specific high-risk re-offense criteria. This change modifies existing juvenile disposition options under §26-8C-7, adding a limited pathway to corrections for serious weapons cases. It directly affects juveniles convicted of these specific weapons offenses who meet all the enumerated conditions.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 1162: add certain substances to Schedule I of the controlled substances schedule.

HB 1162 adds 59 specific substances - including synthetic opioids like "W-18" and "butonitazene," as well as compounds such as "methiopropamine" - to South Dakota's Schedule I controlled substances list. This means these substances are now classified as having no medical use and a high potential for abuse under state law. The bill directly affects anyone in South Dakota who possesses, distributes, or uses these listed substances, making such actions illegal without specific exemptions. The key mechanism is the explicit inclusion of these chemical compounds (including isomers and salts) into Schedule I, closing potential legal gaps for enforcement.
passed · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HB 1065: revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.

HB 1065 would require individuals facing cannabis-related charges to possess a registry identification card to use a legal defense claiming they are permitted to possess cannabis. Currently, South Dakota law does not mandate this card for such defenses, but the bill would amend § 34-20G-53 to make it a requirement. This change would directly affect people charged with cannabis offenses who attempt to rely on this specific defense in court. The bill creates a new condition for accessing this defense, requiring the card as a prerequisite for its use.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1212: revise provisions in order to strengthen protections for unborn children.

HB 1212 repeals a provision that previously shielded women from criminal liability for unlawful abortions. It removes the exception that prevented homicide charges when an abortion caused an unborn child's death, making such cases subject to standard homicide laws (Class B felony). The bill directly affects women seeking abortions and medical providers performing them, as it eliminates prior legal protections for abortion-related deaths. Exceptions for lifesaving procedures to preserve the mother's life or spontaneous miscarriages remain unchanged.