Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Erik Muckey
95% support rate
Top opponent
John Carley
21% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving criminal justice in South Dakota

Legislators moving criminal justice in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Strong +
95% 19
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
88% 17
Ernie Otten
Ernie Otten Senate · District 6
R
Strong +
86% 14
Jack Kolbeck
Jack Kolbeck House · District 13
R
Strong +
85% 20
Erin Healy
Erin Healy House · District 10
D
Strong +
82% 17
John Carley
John Carley Senate · District 29
R
Oppose
21% 14
Taffy Howard
Taffy Howard Senate · District 34
R
Oppose
23% 13
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Oppose
24% 17
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
24% 21
Heather Baxter
Heather Baxter House · District 34
R
Oppose
24% 21
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All criminal justice bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 179: permit a court to commit a juvenile adjudicated delinquent for certain weapons offenses to the Department of Corrections.

SB 179 allows South Dakota courts to commit juveniles adjudicated delinquent for specific weapons offenses to the Department of Corrections, but only under strict conditions. It applies when no other viable alternative exists, corrections is the least restrictive option, and the juvenile was convicted of certain weapons offenses (like those under §22-14-5, 22-14-7, 22-14-20, or 23-7-44). The court must also find the juvenile poses a significant risk of physical harm, has prior adjudications for separate offenses, or meets specific high-risk re-offense criteria. This change modifies existing juvenile disposition options under §26-8C-7, adding a limited pathway to corrections for serious weapons cases. It directly affects juveniles convicted of these specific weapons offenses who meet all the enumerated conditions.
signed · South Dakota · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 1162: add certain substances to Schedule I of the controlled substances schedule.

HB 1162 adds 59 specific substances - including synthetic opioids like "W-18" and "butonitazene," as well as compounds such as "methiopropamine" - to South Dakota's Schedule I controlled substances list. This means these substances are now classified as having no medical use and a high potential for abuse under state law. The bill directly affects anyone in South Dakota who possesses, distributes, or uses these listed substances, making such actions illegal without specific exemptions. The key mechanism is the explicit inclusion of these chemical compounds (including isomers and salts) into Schedule I, closing potential legal gaps for enforcement.
passed · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HB 1065: revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.

HB 1065 would require individuals facing cannabis-related charges to possess a registry identification card to use a legal defense claiming they are permitted to possess cannabis. Currently, South Dakota law does not mandate this card for such defenses, but the bill would amend § 34-20G-53 to make it a requirement. This change would directly affect people charged with cannabis offenses who attempt to rely on this specific defense in court. The bill creates a new condition for accessing this defense, requiring the card as a prerequisite for its use.
in committee · South Dakota · House Feb 4, 2026

HB 1124: establish the crime of trespass upon a place of worship, provide a penalty therefor, and declare an emergency.

HB 1124 makes it a felony to enter or remain within 1,000 feet of a place of worship with intent to disrupt services, harass attendees, or intimidate through political means. Violators face a Class 5 felony charge. The bill defines "place of worship" as any building regularly used for religious activities, identifiable by design, signs, or features. This law directly affects individuals who intentionally trespass near religious sites with the prohibited intentions.