Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Peri Pourier
91% support rate
Top opponent
Tina Mulally
19% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in South Dakota

Legislators moving budget & taxes in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Peri Pourier
Peri Pourier House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 44
Trish Ladner
Trish Ladner House · District 30
R
Strong +
90% 39
Chris Kassin
Chris Kassin House · District 17
R
Strong +
88% 67
Mike Derby
Mike Derby House · District 34
R
Strong +
88% 67
Greg Jamison
Greg Jamison House · District 12
R
Strong +
87% 47
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Strong −
19% 42
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Strong −
20% 55
Tony Randolph
Tony Randolph House · District 35
R
Oppose
27% 56
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
30% 50
Logan Manhart
Logan Manhart House · District 1
R
Oppose
35% 51
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All budget & taxes bills

passed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 4, 2026

SB 220: authorize a comprehensive study of juvenile correctional and residential facilities, to make an appropriation therefor, and to declare an emergency.

SB 220 directs South Dakota's Department of Corrections to conduct a study evaluating juvenile correctional and residential facilities. The study must examine best practices, therapeutic housing models, vocational training combined with mental health services, and staff-to-youth ratios, including inspections at three facilities outside South Dakota. The bill appropriates $50,000 from the general fund to cover study costs and requires a written report to the Legislative Research Council by September 1, 2026. This is a procedural study bill with no direct policy changes or new requirements for facilities, solely aimed at gathering information for future decisions.
passed both · South Dakota · Senate Mar 2, 2026

SB 223: modify the requirements for a petition to refer an excess tax levy of a school district to a vote.

SB 223 modifies South Dakota's process for school districts to refer excess tax levies to voter approval. It changes the petition signature requirement from a flat 50 voters to "at least five percent of the registered voters" in the school district. The bill also adjusts notice rules, waiving newspaper publication requirements if the district mails the resolution to all property taxpayers within 20 days. This affects school districts seeking voter input on tax increases and directly impacts local taxpayers who may petition to refer levy decisions.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 20, 2026

HB 1317: eliminate a limit on the accumulation of the unused index factor for property taxation.

HB 1317 removes a 10% annual cap on how much South Dakota counties and municipalities can increase property taxes using accumulated unused index factors. Currently, local governments could only raise taxes based on these factors up to the prior three years' total or 10%, whichever was lower. The bill eliminates the 10% limit, allowing them to use all accumulated unused index factors from prior years without this restriction. This directly affects local governments' ability to adjust property tax revenue annually. The change modifies how county auditors calculate annual tax revenue limits under state law.
signed · South Dakota · House Feb 17, 2026

HB 1088: remove the requirement that counties remit to municipalities an amount equal to the road levy for calendar years 1984, 1985, and 1986.

HB 1088 removes a requirement that South Dakota counties must remit funds to municipalities equal to the road levy amounts distributed to those municipalities for calendar years 1984, 1985, and 1986. This specifically targets a provision in existing law that mandated counties pay municipalities a share of road tax revenue from those three years. The bill repeals Section 10-12-32.1, which previously established that municipalities incorporated after January 1, 1984, were entitled to 25% of county road funds for those historical years. This change eliminates a longstanding financial obligation between counties and municipalities for a specific historical period.