Home South Dakota Bills
Bills

South Dakota Bills

Track legislation and stay informed about the bills that matter to you.

passed both · South Dakota · Senate Mar 2, 2026

SB 223: modify the requirements for a petition to refer an excess tax levy of a school district to a vote.

SB 223 modifies South Dakota's process for school districts to refer excess tax levies to voter approval. It changes the petition signature requirement from a flat 50 voters to "at least five percent of the registered voters" in the school district. The bill also adjusts notice rules, waiving newspaper publication requirements if the district mails the resolution to all property taxpayers within 20 days. This affects school districts seeking voter input on tax increases and directly impacts local taxpayers who may petition to refer levy decisions.
Al Novstrup (R) Sue Peterson (R) Joy Hohn (R) Lauren Nelson (R) Taffy Howard (R)
passed · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HB 1065: revise the medical purpose affirmative defense in cannabis prosecution.

HB 1065 would require individuals facing cannabis-related charges to possess a registry identification card to use a legal defense claiming they are permitted to possess cannabis. Currently, South Dakota law does not mandate this card for such defenses, but the bill would amend § 34-20G-53 to make it a requirement. This change would directly affect people charged with cannabis offenses who attempt to rely on this specific defense in court. The bill creates a new condition for accessing this defense, requiring the card as a prerequisite for its use.
Kevin Jensen (R) Bobbi Andera (R) Travis Ismay (R) Jana Hunt (R) Carl Perry (R)
passed both · South Dakota · Senate Mar 2, 2026

SB 110: regulate how broadband internet access service providers use customer data.

SB 110 requires broadband internet providers in South Dakota to obtain explicit customer permission ("opt-in consent") before using, sharing, or selling most types of personal customer data, including location, health details, device identifiers, and financial information. It directly affects broadband service providers (like local internet companies) and their customers by mandating clear consent mechanisms that are easy to understand and use. Key provisions include prohibiting providers from charging higher prices or denying service based on a customer’s refusal to consent, and requiring that consent requests be conspicuous, non-misleading, and available at no extra cost. The law applies specifically to "broadband internet access service providers" as defined in the bill, covering data collected through the customer-provider relationship.
Liz Larson (D) Michael Rohl (R) Tom Pischke (R) John Shubeck (R) Tim Goodwin (R)
passed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 2, 2026

SB 93: prohibit certain state officers or employees from being employed by an organization that was the recipient of a contract awarded on behalf of a state agency for a period of time.

SB 93 prohibits state employees who approve, award, or administer state contracts from working for the organizations that received those contracts after leaving state service. For contracts under $1 million, this creates a one-year waiting period; for contracts over $1 million, it extends to two years. The bill allows exceptions if a governing body authorizes the arrangement through written disclosure and approval, ensuring the arrangement is fair and in the public interest. This applies to employees handling contracts within their official duties, excluding unpaid or per diem roles.
Nicole Uhre-Balk (D) Kevin Jensen (R) Heather Baxter (R) Stephanie Sauder (R) David Kull (R)
passed both · South Dakota · Senate Feb 26, 2026

SB 115: remove the prohibition pertaining to the shooting of mourning doves located within specific areas.

SB 115 removes a specific rule that previously prohibited hunting mourning doves on highways or public rights-of-way in South Dakota. The bill amends existing law to allow hunting mourning doves (previously excluded) in areas where small game hunting is otherwise permitted on highways and public rights-of-way. This change directly affects hunters who wish to pursue mourning doves near roads or public pathways that were previously restricted. The bill does not alter other hunting rules, safety zones, or penalties related to firearm discharge near dwellings or schools.
Les Heinemann (R) Aaron Aylward (R) Dylan Jordan (R) Tom Pischke (R) Scott Moore (R)
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 26, 2026

SB 183: modify requirements for public notice of a hearing prior to a vote to impose an excess tax levy.

SB 183 requires school districts and other taxing districts in South Dakota to provide detailed public notice at least 21 days before voting on an excess tax levy. The notice must be published online or in a local newspaper and mailed to all property owners, including specifics like the maximum excess amount, base tax limits, hearing details, estimated tax increases per $100,000 in property value, and how funds will be used. This bill directly affects property owners by giving them more time and clear information to review proposed tax increases before a vote. The key change strengthens transparency by mandating standardized, detailed notice and requiring districts to allow public comments at the hearing.
Joy Hohn (R) Carl Perry (R) Amber Hulse (R) Tim Goodwin (R)
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 25, 2026

SCR 608: urging collaboration to reduce hunger and food waste in this state under the protections of the 1996 Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Food Donation Act.

This non-binding Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR 608) urges South Dakota restaurants, grocery stores, and food service businesses to collaborate with nonprofits to donate excess safe, edible food - reducing hunger and food waste. It references the federal Bill Emerson Good Samaritan Act, which protects donors from liability for such donations, and encourages partnerships without creating new laws or requirements. The resolution does not impose mandates but seeks to promote existing donation practices aligned with federal protections.
Jamie Smith (D)
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 25, 2026

SJR 504: proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, providing for wagering on sporting events via mobile or electronic platform.

SJR 504 proposes a constitutional amendment to allow South Dakota to authorize mobile and electronic wagering on sporting events. The amendment requires such wagering to be offered only through licensed Deadwood casinos with servers located within Deadwood, and mandates that 90% of tax revenue from these wagers must fund statewide property tax relief or reductions. If approved by voters, this would change the state constitution to permit this new form of betting, which is currently restricted under existing gambling laws. The amendment must be voted on by South Dakota residents at the next general election to take effect.
Roger DeGroot (R) Casey Crabtree (R) Randy Deibert (R) Jessica Bahmuller (R) Jeff Bathke (R)
passed both · South Dakota · Senate Feb 25, 2026

SB 34: amend provisions pertaining to conducting a municipal or school district election and to declare an emergency.

SB 34 clarifies voting rules and election procedures for South Dakota municipalities and school districts. It defines key terms like "in conjunction with" (timing) and "combined with" (shared responsibilities), and updates residency requirements for voters (requiring actual residence in the municipality, with exceptions for students and military members with local home of record). The bill specifies when voter challenges can be made - only through established procedures (§ 12-18-10) - and adjusts notice requirements, mandating weekly publication of election notices for two weeks before elections, with specific timing windows. It applies directly to local election officials and voters in municipal/school district elections.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 25, 2026

HB 1105: restrict contracts and declarations that prohibit the use of commercial or residential property for any healthcare service in medically underserved areas or communities, or in areas with a medically underserved population under federal law.

HB 1105 prevents property owners in specific areas from using contracts or declarations to block healthcare services on commercial property. It applies to municipalities/townships under 3,000 people (per federal census) or areas officially designated as medically underserved by South Dakota’s Department of Health. The bill invalidates any contract or declaration that restricts the use of commercial property for healthcare services like clinics, diagnoses, or treatment in these areas. This directly affects property owners and developers who previously could impose such restrictions, while enabling healthcare providers to operate in underserved communities.
Al Novstrup (R) Heather Baxter (R) Eric Emery (D) Carl Perry (R) MyKala Voita (R)
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 25, 2026

SCR 605: recognizing the significance of the monarch butterfly and encouraging cooperative, voluntary conservation efforts in South Dakota.

Senate Concurrent Resolution 605 is a non-binding resolution recognizing the monarch butterfly's ecological importance and encouraging voluntary conservation efforts in South Dakota. It urges state agencies, local governments, and land managers to preserve existing milkweed habitats where practical and prioritize pollinator-friendly native seed mixes - including milkweed - in plantings that align with land management goals. The resolution specifically emphasizes voluntary cooperation with landowners and agricultural operations, avoiding regulatory impacts, while urging federal agencies to support these efforts through technical assistance. It does not create new legal requirements but formally supports existing conservation practices.
Nicole Uhre-Balk (D) Stephanie Sauder (R) Eric Emery (D) Carl Perry (R) Tim Reed (R)
passed both · South Dakota · Senate Feb 25, 2026

SCR 606: encouraging the review and approval of water rights applications and future use reservations from the Missouri River.

This Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 606 urges the South Dakota Conservancy District to apply for a future use permit to reserve 500,000 acre-feet of Missouri River water annually for the state's long-term needs. It specifically directs the Conservancy District to file this application and report its progress to the Legislative Research Council by November 30, 2026. The resolution does not create new law but emphasizes the importance of securing water rights through existing legal procedures under South Dakota law. It directly affects the Conservancy District as the entity responsible for managing the state's water resources. The focus is on proactive planning for future water availability, not on immediate regulatory changes.
Al Novstrup (R) Tesa Schwans (R) Bobbi Andera (R) Joy Hohn (R) Carl Perry (R)
Showing 25 to 36 of 1,789 bills
Previous 1 2 3 4 150 Next