Maddy summaryThe Power for the People Act of 2026 requires data center owners and operators to pay for the grid upgrades they necessitate, rather than passing these costs to residential and business ratepayers. The bill establishes data center-specific load queues that prioritize facilities implementing low-carbon energy solutions, labor standards, and grid-friendly practices, while delaying or denying interconnection for those that don't meet these requirements. It also mandates that states create data center-specific rate classes to ensure these facilities pay for the full cost of grid upgrades, including transmission and distribution costs. The legislation includes provisions for transparency in forecasting data center energy demands and encourages the use of battery storage and renewable energy to reduce grid strain. The bill aims to protect grid reliability, ensure electricity affordability, and minimize environmental impacts of data center development.
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits using federal funds to reimburse corporations for investments in Venezuela's oil sector. It blocks U.S. taxpayer money from covering "qualified capital expenditures" (like new facilities or permanent property improvements) made by any corporation in Venezuela's oil and gas industry. The law applies to all U.S. and foreign corporations operating in Venezuela's oil sector, preventing federal reimbursement for these specific investments. It does not ban the investments themselves, only the use of public funds to cover them.
This joint resolution directs the President to terminate the use of U.S. Armed Forces for hostilities within or against Venezuela unless a declaration of war or authorization to use military force for such purpose has been enacted. The joint resolution specifies that it shall not be construed to prevent the United States from defending itself from an armed attack or threat of an imminent armed attack.
Maddy summaryThe "No Political Enemies Act" (S 3646) prohibits federal officials from taking enforcement actions against individuals or groups that are substantially motivated by their constitutionally protected speech, such as criticism of government policies. It creates legal defenses for those targeted, requiring courts to dismiss enforcement actions if proven to be politically motivated, and establishes new remedies including the ability to seek injunctions and sue for damages. The bill also requires the Justice Department to report quarterly to Congress on sensitive investigations and prohibits using government funds for politically motivated enforcement actions. This legislation directly affects federal enforcement agencies, officials, and anyone engaging in protected speech who might face government action.
Maddy summarySJRES 84 is a joint resolution seeking to block a rule issued by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under the Affordable Care Act. The rule, published in the Federal Register on June 25, 2025, aimed to improve affordability and integrity in health insurance marketplaces. If approved, this resolution would invalidate the rule under a federal disapproval process, preventing its implementation. This directly affects how health insurance plans are structured and priced for consumers using ACA marketplaces.
Maddy summaryS 3622, the SERVE Act, prohibits naming or renaming any federal building, land, or asset after a sitting president. It directly affects all federal property currently named for a sitting president and prevents future naming during a president's term. The bill bans using federal funds for such naming and requires reverting any existing presidential-named property to its prior official designation. This applies to all federal assets covered by existing law, without exception.
Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits U.S. federal funds from being used to support Venezuela's oil and petroleum infrastructure, including construction, property purchases, insurance, payments to companies, or government advocacy for the sector. It directly affects all U.S. government departments, agencies, and entities using federal funds, preventing them from financing or promoting Venezuela's oil industry. The prohibition includes all forms of financial support except for expenditures explicitly authorized by future Acts of Congress. Additionally, the Secretary of State must submit annual reports to congressional committees detailing any related activities and confirming compliance.
Maddy summaryThis resolution commemorates the fifth anniversary of the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack and honors the U.S. Capitol Police, Metropolitan Police Department, and Capitol staff (including custodial, janitorial, and maintenance personnel) who protected the building during the assault. It recognizes their bravery in defending Congress during the attack, which injured over 100 officers and contributed to five officer deaths, and acknowledges their ongoing essential work in maintaining Capitol operations. The resolution expresses Senate gratitude for their service and reaffirms commitment to protecting democratic processes. As a commemorative resolution, it does not create new laws or funding.
Maddy summaryThis bill prohibits the use of federal funds to compensate individuals prosecuted for the January 6 Capitol attack, including those later pardoned. It bans using funds from the Judgment Fund, victim compensation programs, or creating new compensation funds for these individuals. Additionally, it prevents refunds of court-ordered restitution, fines, or special assessments paid by convicted rioters, directing any such funds to the Architect of the Capitol instead. The law directly affects people convicted (or pardoned) for involvement in the January 6 attack.
Maddy summaryS 3581, the "No Settlements for January 6 Law Enforcement Assaulters Act," prohibits using federal funds (including the Judgment Fund) to settle claims by individuals convicted of assaulting law enforcement during the January 6, 2021, Capitol breach. It directly affects those convicted under federal or D.C. law for assaulting officers during the Capitol events, banning settlements for claims related to harm suffered during the events or prosecution for those acts. The bill's key mechanism blocks all federal financial obligations for such settlements, regardless of the claim's basis. This is a substantive policy change affecting legal settlements for specific convicted individuals, not a procedural measure.