Maddy summaryThe "Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl Analogues Act" (S 600) amends federal drug laws to automatically classify a broad range of fentanyl-like substances as illegal under Schedule I. It defines "fentanyl-related substances" to include any compound with specific structural changes to fentanyl - such as modifications to its ring structures or chemical groups - making these analogues automatically controlled without needing individual bans. This directly affects drug manufacturers, distributors, and users of these substances, as well as law enforcement agencies tasked with identifying and regulating new fentanyl variants. The bill aims to close loopholes that allow dangerous, unregulated fentanyl analogues to enter the market before being specifically prohibited. It takes effect one day after enactment.
Sponsored bills
Maddy summaryS 614, the *Protecting Americans from Fentanyl Trafficking Act of 2023*, adds "fentanyl-related substances" to Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act. This directly affects individuals, businesses, and researchers handling new fentanyl variants not yet approved for medical use. The bill defines these substances broadly to include any structurally modified versions of fentanyl (e.g., changes to its chemical groups or rings), making them illegal without authorization. This expands the legal definition to target emerging synthetic fentanyl analogs created to evade current drug laws.
Maddy summaryThis symbolic Senate resolution (SRES 69) designates February 18-25, 2023, as "National FFA Week" to celebrate the 95th anniversary of the National FFA Organization. It recognizes FFA’s role in developing future agricultural leaders through its educational programs, which serve over 850,000 students across all 50 states and territories. The resolution has no legal effect - it is a ceremonial expression of support, not a policy change. It directly affects the FFA organization and its members by highlighting their educational mission during a designated week.
Maddy summaryS 444 requires the U.S. Senate to approve any World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic preparedness treaty before it becomes binding on the United States. The bill mandates that agreements resulting from the WHO’s pandemic treaty negotiations (currently led by the International Negotiating Body) must be treated as treaties under the U.S. Constitution, requiring Senate ratification with a two-thirds vote. It directly affects U.S. foreign policy implementation by ensuring congressional oversight of international pandemic agreements. The bill responds to concerns about WHO’s pandemic management and aims to prevent executive agreements from bypassing Senate review.
Maddy summarySenate Resolution 64 authorizes former Senate employee Daniel Schwager to provide testimony in the federal case *United States v. GossJankowski* (Case No. 21-123), while allowing Senate Legal Counsel to represent him and other Senate employees regarding evidence production. The resolution permits Schwager to testify except for matters protected by Senate privileges, following Senate rules and the Ethics in Government Act of 1978. This procedural action ensures the Senate controls the release of evidence under its possession and provides legal support for employees in court matters related to their official duties.
Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 7) seeks congressional disapproval of a 2023 rule defining "Waters of the United States" (WOTUS), which would have changed how federal agencies regulate wetlands and waterways. It targets a rule jointly issued by the Army Corps of Engineers, EPA, and other agencies (88 Fed. Reg. 3004, Jan. 18, 2023), directly affecting landowners, developers, and environmental regulators by altering jurisdiction over water resources. If passed, the resolution would nullify the rule under a specific disapproval process in Title 5 of U.S. Code, preventing it from taking effect. The resolution does not create new regulations but aims to block an existing federal rule. This is a procedural step, not a new law.
Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 12) seeks congressional disapproval of the District of Columbia Council’s approval of the Revised Criminal Code Act of 2022 (D.C. Act 24-789). It directly affects D.C. residents and local government, as the resolution targets the District’s newly enacted criminal code. The mechanism is a formal congressional disapproval under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, requiring passage by both chambers to block the D.C. law from taking effect. The resolution does not alter the D.C. code itself but aims to halt its implementation through federal action.
Maddy summaryThis bill limits attorneys' fees for claims related to water contamination at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, affecting veterans, civilians, and their attorneys filing under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act. It caps fees at 12% of administrative claim payments or 17% of court settlements/judgments, prohibits additional fees/costs, and requires attorneys to certify fee amounts. The bill also mandates annual reporting to Congress on all fees paid, including attorney names and amounts. These changes apply to all pending and future claims under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act.
Maddy summaryThis joint resolution seeks congressional disapproval of a Department of Labor rule published in the Federal Register on December 1, 2022 (87 Fed. Reg. 73822), which addressed "Prudence and Loyalty in Selecting Plan Investments and Exercising Shareholder Rights." If enacted, it would block the rule from taking effect, directly affecting retirement plan fiduciaries (such as those managing 401(k) plans) who must follow these standards. The resolution uses a specific disapproval process under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, to nullify the rule without altering its content. This is a procedural action targeting the rule's implementation, not a new policy.
This resolution designates the Senate minority party's membership for the 118th Congress on the following committees: the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; the Committee on Appropriations; the Committee on Armed Services; the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs; the Committee on the Budget; the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation; the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources; the Committee on the Environment and Public Works; the Committee on Finance; the Committee on Foreign Relations; the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions; the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs; the Committee on Indian Affairs; the Committee on the Judiciary; the Committee on Rules and Administration; the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship; the Committee on Veterans' Affairs; the Joint Economic Committee; the Select Committee on Ethics; the Select Committee on Intelligence; and the Special Committee on Aging.