Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in North Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
6
69th Legislative Assembly (2025-26)
Top supporter
Austin Foss
88% support rate
Top opponent
Christina Wolff
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving labor & employment in North Dakota

Legislators moving labor & employment in North Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Austin Foss
Austin Foss House · District 44
D
Strong +
88% 86
Karla Rose Hanson
Karla Rose Hanson House · District 44
D
Strong +
88% 87
Mary Schneider
Mary Schneider House · District 21
D
Strong +
88% 87
Tim Mathern
Tim Mathern Senate · District 11
D
Strong +
86% 36
Josh Boschee
Josh Boschee Senate · District 44
D
Strong +
86% 35
Christina Wolff
Christina Wolff House · District 38
R
Strong −
0% 80
Jeff Magrum
Jeff Magrum Senate · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 36
Dawson Holle
Dawson Holle House · District 31
R
Strong −
7% 86
Dennis Nehring
Dennis Nehring House · District 23
R
Strong −
12% 87
Desiree Morton
Desiree Morton House · District 46
R
Strong −
12% 87
Showing 6 of 6 bills

All labor & employment bills

signed · North Dakota · House Apr 7, 2025

HB 1602: AN ACT to amend and reenact section 54-52-02.15 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to political subdivision participation in the public employees retirement system defined contribution retirement plan.

HB 1602 changes North Dakota's public employee retirement system by closing the traditional defined benefit plan to new hires starting January 1, 2025. Instead, new permanent employees (excluding those in specific exception roles like teachers, law enforcement, or university staff) must join a defined contribution retirement plan. Existing members who joined before 2025 remain in the defined benefit plan, and political subdivisions (like cities or counties) may choose whether to participate in the new defined contribution plan. The bill clarifies that local governments are not required to offer either retirement plan, and no fees apply if they withdraw from the defined contribution system.
passed · North Dakota · House Mar 7, 2025

HB 1179: A BILL for an Act to provide for a legislative management study regarding paid time off for the faculty at an institution of higher education.

HB 1179 would require North Dakota's public institutions of higher education to provide faculty members with at least a 12-month appointment 24 days of paid time off annually. It mandates institutions to track accrued time off, sets a limit of 30 days to carry over into the next year, and requires payment for unused time upon termination (capped at 54 days total). Institutions failing to implement this by August 1, 2025, would need to grant 54 days of paid time off to faculty by January 1, 2026. The bill directly affects faculty at all public colleges and universities governed by the state board of higher education.
failed · North Dakota · Senate Feb 17, 2025

SB 2131: A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new section to chapter 52-08 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to workforce training center funding distribution.

SB 2131 would change how North Dakota distributes state funds to workforce training centers. It requires the state board to allocate 60% of funding equally among all centers, 20% based on each center's average annual training hours over the prior three years, and 20% based on each center's average number of unique participants over the same period. The bill directly affects all designated workforce training centers in the state by altering their funding formula. The bill was introduced in 2025 but failed to pass the legislature on February 17, 2025, with 16 votes in favor and 29 against.
failed · North Dakota · Senate Feb 10, 2025

SB 2306: A BILL for an Act to create and enact a new section to chapter 50-11.1 of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to the establishment of a child care workforce recruitment and retention program.

SB 2306 proposes a program to address child care staffing shortages by providing monthly payments to licensed early childhood providers in North Dakota. The bill would require the state to pay providers $50 per infant, $30 per toddler, and $15 per school-aged child enrolled, based on quarterly reports of average enrollment. To qualify, providers must not have received a corrective action order in the past three months and must submit annual reports detailing how funds were used to improve staff salaries and benefits. This bill directly affects licensed child care centers and family child care homes by offering financial incentives tied to enrollment levels. The program aims to retain and recruit child care workers through direct support for provider compensation needs.
failed · North Dakota · Senate Feb 7, 2025

SB 2345: A BILL for an Act to provide for state employee compensation adjustments.

SB 2345 would have provided permanent North Dakota state employees with a 4% pay raise each year during the 2025-27 biennium, effective July 2025 (paid August 2025) and July 2026 (paid August 2026). The bill directly affected all eligible permanent state employees by adjusting their base compensation annually. It required no new funding mechanisms beyond existing appropriations, as the increases were tied to the biennial budget cycle. The bill failed to pass the legislature on February 7, 2025, with 6 votes in favor and 41 against.
passed · North Dakota · Senate Feb 5, 2025

SB 2206: A BILL for an Act to amend and reenact section 28-01-17, of the North Dakota Century Code, relating to civil actions having three-year limitations.

SB 2206 changes North Dakota law regarding civil lawsuits involving commercial motor carriers (like trucking companies) and safety belt usage. It reduces the statute of limitations for certain injury or death claims from three years to two years and caps non-economic damages (like pain and suffering) at $500,000 per case against these carriers. The bill also clarifies that failing to wear a safety belt in a vehicle, as required by law, cannot be used as direct evidence of negligence in court but may reduce awarded damages by up to 1% if proven to have contributed to the injury. These changes apply specifically to civil actions arising from commercial motor vehicle operations.