Issue · Immigration

Immigration

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
1
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Efstathia Booras
80% support rate
Top opponent
Matt Coker
22% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving immigration in New Hampshire

Legislators moving immigration in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Efstathia Booras
Efstathia Booras House · District Hillsborough 8
D
Strong +
80% 5
Heath Howard
Heath Howard House · District Strafford 4
D
Support
73% 11
James Roesener
James Roesener House · District Merrimack 22
D
Support
70% 10
Mark Vallone
Mark Vallone House · District Rockingham 5
D
Support
69% 13
Mark MacKenzie
Mark MacKenzie House · District Hillsborough 40
D
Support
67% 12
Matt Coker
Matt Coker House · District Belknap 2
R
Oppose
22% 9
Beth Richards
Beth Richards House · District Merrimack 17
D
Oppose
29% 7
Jeff Tenczar
Jeff Tenczar House · District Hillsborough 1
R
Oppose
33% 9
Travis Toner
Travis Toner House · District Belknap 4
R
Oppose
33% 9
Adam Presa
Adam Presa House · District Hillsborough 12
R
Oppose
33% 6
Showing 1 of 1 bills

All immigration bills

failed · New Hampshire · Senate Mar 5, 2026

SB 623: relative to requirements for law enforcement officers assisting in immigration enforcement.

This bill requires New Hampshire state and local law enforcement officers who assist U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) under the federal 287(g) program to display their name or badge number, refrain from wearing facial coverings, and keep body-worn cameras active during these duties. It mandates that law enforcement agencies establish disciplinary measures for officers who violate these requirements and directs all complaints about violations to the state Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Unit for investigation. The bill applies only to officers participating in the 287(g) program and takes effect 60 days after enactment. It does not alter existing requirements for officers not engaged in federal immigration enforcement.