Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in New Hampshire, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Myles England
70% support rate
Top opponent
Sheri Minor
29% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving criminal justice in New Hampshire

Legislators moving criminal justice in New Hampshire
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Myles England
Myles England House · District Strafford 12
D
Support
70% 10
Mike Harrington
Mike Harrington House · District Strafford 18
R
Support
69% 26
James Roesener
James Roesener House · District Merrimack 22
D
Support
69% 16
Sue Vandecasteele
Sue Vandecasteele House · District Rockingham 25
R
Support
67% 18
Catherine Sofikitis
Catherine Sofikitis House · District Hillsborough 7
D
Support
67% 6
Sheri Minor
Sheri Minor House · District Belknap 5
R
Oppose
29% 7
Eleana Colby
Eleana Colby House · District Merrimack 9
D
Oppose
35% 20
Samantha Jacobs
Samantha Jacobs House · District Cheshire 15
D
Oppose
35% 20
Jodi Nelson
Jodi Nelson House · District Rockingham 13
R
Oppose
36% 14
Mike Bordes
Mike Bordes House · District Belknap 5
R
Oppose
36% 14
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All criminal justice bills

passed both · New Hampshire · Senate May 21, 2026

SB 409: relative to the penalties for the offense of disobeying an officer and relative to liability of governmental units.

SB 409 amends penalties for disobeying law enforcement officers during traffic stops or pursuits. It increases penalties for specific violations: disobeying orders to stop (subparagraph I(c)) now carries a class B felony if a motor vehicle accident causes serious injury, and a class A felony if the accident causes death or injury to another person. The bill directly affects drivers who refuse to comply with officers during traffic enforcement, particularly in situations involving collisions. These changes enhance criminal penalties for dangerous disobedience during pursuits, without adding new financial costs to state or local governments.
signed · New Hampshire · Senate Apr 21, 2026

SB 620: relative to refusal of consent to testing to determine alcohol concentration and penalties for aggravated driving while intoxicated.

SB 620 increases license suspension periods for drivers who refuse alcohol testing and modifies penalties for aggravated driving while intoxicated (DWI). For a first refusal of testing, license suspension rises from 180 days to 12 months; for repeat offenders with prior DWI convictions or refusals, it increases from 2 to 3 years. The bill also adds new requirements for aggravated DWI convictions, including a mandatory 17-day jail sentence (suspensible), a substance use disorder evaluation within 60 days of release, and installation of an ignition interlock device. These changes directly affect drivers arrested for DWI who refuse testing or are convicted of aggravated DWI offenses. The policy focuses on stricter consequences for refusal and repeat offenses, with court discretion to suspend up to 6 months of license revocation if treatment requirements are met.
failed · New Hampshire · House Mar 11, 2026

HB 1464: relative to discrimination, harassment, and violence based on political affiliation or opinion.

HB 1464 defines "political affiliation or opinion" to include First Amendment-protected activities like supporting political parties or candidates. It prohibits discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations based on political views, and bans politically motivated harassment or economic interference (such as doxxing to cause job loss). The bill creates new criminal penalties: class A misdemeanors for harassment targeting political views, and class B felonies if economic harm or threats of violence occur. It directly affects workers, businesses, and anyone facing political harassment, expanding existing anti-discrimination laws to cover political expression.
failed · New Hampshire · House Feb 12, 2026

HB 1642: relative to extreme risk protection orders.

HB 1642 establishes a new legal process for courts to issue temporary orders restricting access to firearms for individuals deemed to pose an immediate risk of harm to themselves or others. Eligible petitioners - including family or household members, intimate partners, or law enforcement officers - must file a court petition with a sworn affidavit detailing specific safety concerns, such as recent threats or dangerous behavior involving firearms. The court may issue an initial temporary order without the person at risk being present, followed by a prompt hearing where they can respond. The order requires the individual to surrender firearms and ammunition and remains in effect until the court decides otherwise, prioritizing public safety while ensuring due process.