Issue · Transportation

Transportation

Every transportation bill, vote, and legislator stance in Nebraska, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
109th Legislature (2025-2026)
Top supporter
Jane Raybould
100% support rate
Top opponent
Tom Brandt
29% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving transportation in Nebraska

Legislators moving transportation in Nebraska
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jane Raybould
Jane Raybould House · District 28
N
Strong +
100% 26
Dan Quick
Dan Quick House · District 35
N
Strong +
93% 26
Jason Prokop
Jason Prokop House · District 27
N
Strong +
90% 21
Dunixi Guereca
Dunixi Guereca House · District 7
N
Strong +
80% 23
John Fredrickson
John Fredrickson House · District 20
N
Support
78% 17
Tom Brandt
Tom Brandt House · District 32
N
Oppose
29% 30
Jana Hughes
Jana Hughes House · District 24
N
Oppose
35% 27
Mike Moser
Mike Moser House · District 22
N
Oppose
38% 29
Loren Lippincott
Loren Lippincott House · District 34
N
Mixed −
42% 31
Dave Murman
Dave Murman House · District 38
N
Mixed −
42% 31
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All transportation bills

died · Nebraska · Legislature Apr 17, 2026

LB 915: Change the number of authorized inland port districts under the Municipal Inland Port Authority Act

LB 915 reduces Nebraska's statewide cap on inland port districts from six to five under the Municipal Inland Port Authority Act. This change affects cities, counties, and joint city-county proposals seeking to establish inland port districts by limiting the total number that can be created. The bill does not alter the criteria for creating a district but enforces a stricter maximum, meaning only five districts will be permitted at any time. This policy adjustment directly restricts future expansions of inland port authorities across the state.
Sub-Topics Ports
died · Nebraska · Legislature Apr 17, 2026

LB 106: Change requirements for motor vehicle windows

Nebraska's LB 106 amends window tinting rules for motor vehicles, directly affecting drivers and vehicle owners. It increases allowable tint darkness by raising the maximum luminous reflectance and minimum light transmission limits for front side windows from 20% to 35% (previously stricter). The bill also adjusts rear window standards (maintaining 20% minimum light transmission for most vehicles but adding exceptions for vans, buses, and multipurpose vehicles). It preserves existing restrictions on windshield tinting (below the AS-1 line must be clear, no red/yellow/amber above) and maintains federal safety glazing requirements for campers and motor homes. The changes make it easier to apply darker tint to front side windows while keeping safety standards for visibility.
died · Nebraska · Legislature Apr 17, 2026

LB 471: Prohibit certain restrictions by state agencies, state entities, counties, cities, and villages relating to the energy source of motor vehicles and prohibit certain actions of the Department of Environment and Energy related to vehicle emission standards

LB 471 prohibits state agencies, counties, cities, and villages from restricting the use, purchase, or sale of motor vehicles based on their energy source (e.g., electric, gasoline, or hybrid power). It also prevents the Department of Environment and Energy from seeking federal waivers to set stricter vehicle emission standards than those required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The bill directly affects vehicle buyers, dealers, and local governments by ensuring they cannot impose rules targeting specific vehicle energy types. Key provisions eliminate barriers to all vehicle types and maintain alignment with federal emission standards.
Sub-Topics Electric Vehicles
died · Nebraska · Legislature Apr 17, 2026

LB 542: Change and eliminate payment provisions for road construction costs relating to utility facilities

This bill amends Nebraska law to change how costs are paid when utility lines (like gas, water, or broadband) must be moved during road construction. It eliminates the state's obligation to cover relocation costs for utility facilities on highways that were once part of the interstate system but were later removed, ending state payments for such moves after July 1, 1993. The bill also removes outdated provisions about these payments and clarifies that state funding won't cover relocation costs for these specific highway cases. This directly affects utility companies and state transportation projects involving older highway corridors.
Sub-Topics Roads & Highways