Issue · Technology

Technology (Emerging Technology)

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
7
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 7 of 7 bills

All technology bills

in committee · Michigan · House Jul 29, 2026

HB 6222: Consumer protection: other; cryptocurrency exchange kiosk regulation act; create. Creates new act. TIE BAR WITH: HB 6223'26

This Michigan bill establishes the Cryptocurrency Exchange Kiosk Regulation Act to oversee physical terminals where users can swap government currency for digital assets. It directly affects businesses operating these kiosks by mandating that they be located in secure, staffed areas and restricting daily transactions to a maximum of $500 per user. The legislation also requires new users to wait at least 24 hours before completing a transaction, mandates clear warnings about fraud risks and transaction irreversibility, and requires operators to provide detailed receipts and maintain transaction records. To enforce these rules, the state attorney general is empowered to investigate violations and impose civil fines of up to $10,000 for single infractions or $25,000 for repeated offenses. Finally, the bill will only take effect if a companion bill, HB 6223, is also enacted into law.
Sub-Topics Emerging Technology
passed · Michigan · House May 19, 2026

HB 5899: State management: other; artificial intelligence pilot program; establish for state departments and agencies. Creates new act.

This bill establishes an artificial intelligence governing board and creates a pilot program for state departments and agencies to test generative AI tools. The governor-appointed board will include experts in technology, ethics, and the private sector to develop ethical guidelines and advise on the program's implementation. Starting in January 2027, the pilot program allows approved state employees to use AI tools while prohibiting activities that violate privacy laws, discriminate, or compromise data security. The department of technology, management, and budget will manage the program, including auditing AI usage and providing training to ensure compliance with state and federal standards.
in committee · Michigan · House Mar 10, 2026

HB 5670: Public employees and officers: compensation and benefits; methods of compensation for salaried employees of the state civil service commission; require option for cryptocurrency. Amends 1978 PA 390 (MCL 408.471 - 408.490) by adding sec. 6a.

This bill would allow certain Michigan state civil service employees to request that their wages be paid in cryptocurrency starting in 2027. It directly affects salaried members of the classified state civil service who work for the state. Under the proposed law, employees could choose to receive payment in U.S. currency, via direct deposit, or through one of at least six digital currency options, which must include Bitcoin. The state would be prohibited from using any digital currency controlled by a national government or central bank. Employees would receive their wages in the payment method they select, with currency payments requiring in-person pickup at the Department of Treasury in Lansing.
passed · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5323: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; installation of geofencing around critical infrastructure or buildings; allow. Amends 1984 PA 431 (MCL 18.1101 - 18.1594) by adding sec. 219a.

HB 5323 authorizes Michigan state agencies to install technology that detects or blocks unauthorized drones near state-owned buildings and critical infrastructure like power plants or water facilities. The bill allows for two key mechanisms: (1) devices to detect drones flying overhead, and (2) systems to prevent drones from entering restricted airspace. It also requires coordination with the state transportation department to include these locations in a statewide geofencing database. The law explicitly states it does not override federal drone regulations.
Sub-Topics Emerging Technology
passed · Michigan · House May 12, 2026

HB 5327: Crimes: trespassing; downing of a trespassing drone; allow. Amends sec. 22 of 2016 PA 436 (MCL 259.322).

HB 5327 amends Michigan's drone law to prohibit specific drone uses that violate privacy or safety. It bans operating drones to harass people (as defined by existing harassment laws), capture private images in violation of privacy expectations, follow or photograph individuals (especially for sex offenders under registration requirements), or disturb quiet enjoyment of private homes. The bill directly affects all drone operators, with additional restrictions for sex offenders. Key mechanisms include expanding existing drone restrictions to cover harassment, privacy invasions, and proximity to restraining orders. The law takes effect 90 days after enactment.
Sub-Topics Emerging Technology
passed · Michigan · House Mar 11, 2026

HB 4511: State finance: other; limitations on holding a digital asset; prohibit. Creates new act.

HB 4511 prohibits Michigan state and local governments from banning digital asset holdings, requiring permits for them, imposing extra taxes based solely on digital asset use, or restricting blockchain-related activities like node operations, asset transfers, or staking. It also bans state agencies from advocating for U.S. central bank digital currency and shields individuals validating transactions or operating nodes from civil liability. The bill directly affects Michigan residents, businesses, and blockchain service providers using digital assets like cryptocurrency or stablecoins. Key provisions define "digital assets" broadly and require state actions to align with blockchain protocols without unnecessary restrictions.
Sub-Topics Emerging Technology
passed · Michigan · Senate Mar 11, 2026

SB 525: Aeronautics: unmanned aircraft systems; exceptions to prohibited use of an unmanned aircraft system; expand. Amends sec. 7 of 2016 PA 436 (MCL 259.307).

SB 525 limits when Michigan state agencies can use drones (unmanned aircraft systems) to inspect facilities they regulate, requiring facility owners' consent or specific circumstances. Exceptions include obtaining written consent from owners (with conditions about FAA compliance), using a warrant, addressing imminent safety threats, inspecting infrastructure like roads or telecom towers, or during declared emergencies. Agencies must mark state-owned drones and share collected data (videos, photos) with facility owners upon request. The law explicitly excludes law enforcement drone use during investigations.