Issue · Environment

Environment (Public Lands)

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Michigan, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All environment bills

in committee · Michigan · House Sep 11, 2025

HB 4851: Natural resources: other; property owned by the department of natural resources; limit to 50% in any state jurisdiction. Amends secs. 503 & 2132 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.503 & 324.2132).

HB 4851 limits the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to owning no more than 50% of all land within any single state jurisdiction (such as a county or township). This amendment to the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act restricts the DNR from purchasing additional surface rights to land north of the Mason-Arenac line unless specific conditions are met. The key mechanism requires the DNR to maintain land ownership below this 50% threshold in any jurisdiction, affecting how the department acquires or manages public lands. The bill does not change existing land management practices but sets a new cap on ownership percentages. This policy directly impacts the DNR’s land acquisition authority and planning for public lands.
signed · Michigan · Senate Dec 23, 2025

SB 689: Land use: farmland and open space; relinquishment of farmland from development rights agreements; expand legal arrangements triggering. Amends sec. 36111 of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.36111). TIE BAR WITH: SB 0688'25, SB 0690'25, SB 0686'25, SB 0687'25, SB 0685'25

SB 689 amends Michigan's farmland preservation law to expand when landowners can give up (relinquish) farmland from development rights agreements. It adds two new scenarios: 1) land with pre-existing structures (up to 5 acres), and 2) land for a farm operator's residence (up to 2 acres), both requiring approval from local government and the state land use agency. If relinquishment occurs, landowners must repay tax credits received under the agreement, plus interest, via a lien recorded against the property. This directly affects farmers with existing farmland preservation agreements who wish to develop or use portions of their land for specific purposes.
Sub-Topics Public Lands