Senate, October 16, 2025 -- The committee on Advanced Information Technology, the Internet and Cybersecurity to whom was referred the petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 44) of Michael O. Moore for legislation relative to deceptive and fraudulent deepfakes in election communications, report the accompanying bill (Senate, No. 2631).
By Representative Haggerty of Woburn, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3117) of Richard M. Haggerty relative to the taxation of disaster response and broadband infrastructure. Revenue.
By Representative Jones of North Reading, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1776) of Bradley H. Jones, Jr., and others relative to the penalty for electronic mail message, web page, or other online service phishing. The Judiciary.
By Representative Owens of Watertown, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1926) of Steven Owens and Lindsay N. Sabadosa relative to tenant data privacy. The Judiciary.
By Representative Paulino of Methuen, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1931) of Francisco E. Paulino for legislation to enhance protections against child exploitation and misuse of emerging technologies. The Judiciary.
By Ms. Rausch, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1253) of Rebecca L. Rausch and James B. Eldridge for legislation to protect the free flow of information in Massachusetts. The Judiciary.
By Ms. Rausch, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 1252) of Rebecca L. Rausch for legislation to establish a right to freedom from doxing. The Judiciary.
By Representative Donahue of Worcester, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 3084) of Daniel M. Donahue relative to increasing economic development and business opportunity in the design and manufacture of video games through the use of tax credits. Revenue.
This bill restricts most law enforcement use of facial recognition technology in Massachusetts. It prohibits police agencies from acquiring or using facial recognition without specific legal authorization, except for limited exceptions like verifying identities for driver's licenses or investigating felonies with a warrant. The law requires strict documentation for emergency uses, mandates transparency by requiring law enforcement to share all technical details about facial recognition searches with defendants in criminal cases, and establishes public reporting requirements for all searches conducted. These provisions directly affect law enforcement agencies, public officials, and individuals involved in criminal cases where facial recognition was used.
By Representative Haggerty of Woburn, a petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 1738) of Richard M. Haggerty and others relative to government entities compelling certain service providers to provide testimony or documents on behalf of a covered journalists. The Judiciary.