Issue · Energy

Energy (Oil & Gas)

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in Maryland, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
5
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
-
no data yet
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
0
0 support · 0 oppose
Showing 5 of 5 bills

All energy bills

in committee · Maryland · House of Delegates Mar 3, 2026

HB 1349: Public Service Commission - Implementation Plan to Convert Formerly Operational Fossil Fuel Generating Stations

HB 1349 requires Maryland's Public Service Commission to develop a plan converting formerly operational fossil fuel power plants to natural gas facilities. The plan must include feasibility studies, cost assessments, solutions for legal/engineering barriers, a conversion timeline balancing costs and reliability, and draft legislation needed for implementation. The Commission must gather input from energy agencies, utilities, local governments, and advocacy groups through a public stakeholder process. The final plan must be submitted to the Governor and relevant legislative committees by January 1, 2027. This bill directly affects the Public Service Commission and indirectly impacts utility companies, ratepayers, and communities hosting former fossil fuel plants.
in committee · Maryland · House of Delegates Feb 26, 2026

HB 958: Natural Gas – Connection and Line Extension – Discounts and Payment Plans

HB 958 prohibits Maryland's Public Service Commission from banning natural gas companies from offering discounts or payment plans for connecting or extending natural gas lines to customer properties. It directly affects natural gas customers who might struggle with upfront connection costs and the public service companies that provide these services. The bill requires the Commission to allow companies to provide these financial options without regulatory restrictions, effective October 1, 2026. This changes how gas connection fees can be structured but does not mandate specific discount levels or create new financial assistance programs.
in committee · Maryland · House of Delegates Feb 4, 2026

HB 673: Consumer Goods - Restrictions Based on Energy Source - Prohibition (Energy Equality Act of 2026)

HB 673 prohibits local or state governments from restricting the sale, purchase, or use of consumer goods (such as vehicles, appliances, or other products) solely based on their energy source - like gasoline, electricity, natural gas, or propane. It repeals existing Maryland laws requiring low-emission vehicle programs and sales rules for zero-emission medium/heavy-duty trucks, ending those specific regulatory requirements. The law applies retroactively to all current restrictions and directly affects consumers, dealers, and manufacturers of energy-source-dependent goods. It does not alter federal emissions standards but removes state-level barriers to using diverse energy sources for everyday products.
in committee · Maryland · House of Delegates Feb 4, 2026

HB 674: Public Service Commission - Full Costs and Benefits Analysis of Sources of Electricity Generation

HB 674 requires Maryland's Public Service Commission to analyze the full costs and benefits of different electricity generation sources for ratepayers. The commission must compare three scenarios: current natural gas and nuclear capacity, 8,500 megawatts of offshore wind plus storage, and calculate additional reliability costs for wind energy. Using the Levelized Full System Cost model, the analysis will identify the lowest-cost options and recommend policy changes to support them. The commission must submit findings to relevant legislative committees by December 1, 2027, with the bill taking effect October 1, 2026. This directly affects electricity ratepayers through potential cost comparisons for state energy choices.
in committee · Maryland · House of Delegates Jan 30, 2026

HB 572: Attorney General Actions and Climate Crimes Accountability Fund (Climate Crimes Accountability Act)

HB 572 authorizes Maryland’s Attorney General to sue large fossil fuel companies (with over $1 billion in market capitalization involved in extracting or processing coal, oil, or gas) for unlawful conduct contributing to climate change, including fraud or deception. It creates the Climate Crimes Accountability Fund, financed by settlements or judgments from these lawsuits, to pay for programs addressing specific climate harms like flooding, extreme heat, drought, and waterborne pathogens. The fund is a special, non-lapsing account managed by the state, with interest earnings automatically added to it. All money must directly support climate harm prevention, mitigation, or repair efforts as defined in the bill.