This bill prohibits financial institutions (like banks and payment networks) from using merchant category codes (MCCs) to identify, track, or disclose transactions involving firearm purchases, firearm accessories, or ammunition. It specifically bans institutions from labeling or linking payment card transactions to firearms dealers or firearm-related sales through codes or other indicators. The law also prevents financial institutions from disclosing protected financial information about firearm purchases to any entity outside of processing the transaction itself. This directly affects banks, credit unions, payment networks, and firearm dealers accepting card payments in Maine.
This bill allocates $225,000 annually from the General Fund to support the Maine Discovery Museum's STEM education programs statewide. It directly funds three specific initiatives: the Maine Science Festival, the Maine Invention Convention, and the Science Around ME program. The funding is intended to sustain these educational efforts for students across Maine, focusing on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. The bill provides ongoing financial support without altering existing laws or creating new regulations.
This bill creates a new independent auditor position within Maine's Attorney General's Office to oversee the Maine Information and Analysis Center (MIAC). The auditor will monitor MIAC's operations to ensure legal compliance, protect privacy and civil liberties, and maintain public transparency. Key provisions require the auditor to publish de-identified reports online annually, including progress on oversight goals and responses to data requests, while safeguarding confidential information. The bill also clarifies that non-classified MIAC information shared with private entities is subject to Maine's public records law. This directly affects MIAC's operations and provides the public with greater visibility into its activities.
Maine's LD 61 requires employers to notify employees before monitoring them using electronic devices (like computers or phones), with specific exceptions for security cameras and vehicle GPS tracking. It prohibits employers from using audiovisual monitoring in employees' homes, personal vehicles, or on their property, and allows workers to refuse installing monitoring apps on their personal devices. Employers must also disclose surveillance practices during job interviews. The law creates a private right for workers to seek legal remedies if violated and directs the Department of Labor to create implementing rules.
LD 109 directs Maine's Arts Commission to study federal and national efforts protecting artists from copyright infringement by AI companies and monitoring educational use of copyrighted works. The commission must consult with the Attorney General and examine relevant laws, including the proposed No Fakes Act and Tennessee's likeness protection law, as well as past legal cases. It will report findings - including potential legislative recommendations - to the Education and Cultural Affairs Committee by December 3, 2025. This study specifically affects artists whose work may be used without permission by AI developers and educational institutions using copyrighted materials. The resolution does not enact new law but sets a process for future legislative action based on the commission's findings.
LD 1088, the Maine Consumer Data Privacy Act, requires businesses to obtain clear, explicit consent from Maine residents before collecting or processing their personal data. The law prohibits deceptive practices (called "dark patterns") that trick people into agreeing to data collection and provides special protections for sensitive data like biometric information and health records. It also sets standards for when data can be considered de-identified (meaning it cannot be linked to an individual) and applies to businesses that handle the personal data of Maine residents. This law directly affects businesses operating in Maine and residents whose data they collect.
This bill prohibits the doxing of minors (people under 18) by making it illegal to knowingly share their personal identifying information - such as home addresses, phone numbers, or social security details - without consent when that disclosure causes stalking, physical harm, property damage, or fear for safety. It allows a minor's family member, legal guardian, or representative to file a civil lawsuit seeking damages, attorney fees, or injunctive relief if doxing occurs. The law includes enhanced penalties (treble damages) if the doxing was motivated by bias based on a minor's race, gender, disability, or other protected characteristic. Key defenses permit disclosures made to law enforcement or for constitutionally protected speech about public concerns.
LD 536, titled "An Act To Establish Net Neutrality," proposes to require internet service providers in Maine to treat all online content equally. This would prevent providers from blocking, slowing, or charging extra for specific websites or services. The bill directly affects Maine residents who use the internet and the state's internet service providers. As a concept draft, it has been referred to the Committee on Energy, Utilities and Technology for further consideration.
This bill requires websites and apps that knowingly distribute obscene online content to verify users are 18 or older using reasonable methods, such as government ID or transactional data. Businesses must not retain any personal information after age verification is complete. It excludes bona fide news broadcasts, public interest content, and services like internet providers, search engines, or cloud hosts that don’t create the content. Violating the bill makes businesses liable for damages - including court costs and attorney fees - if a minor accesses the material, and the Attorney General can enforce it as an unfair practice.
Maine's LD 919 requires public schools, public charter schools, and approved private schools to obtain written parental permission before administering any survey or questionnaire that asks for or identifies a minor student's full name. The bill directly affects schools by restricting how they collect student data and parents by requiring their explicit consent for these specific surveys. Key provisions mandate that schools cannot use such surveys without prior written permission from a parent, covering all student surveys that request full names. This policy change focuses on protecting student privacy for a specific type of data collection in educational settings.
