Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Maine, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
119th Congress
Top supporter
Angus S. King, Jr.
76% support rate
Top opponent
Susan M. Collins
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
4
2 support · 2 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Maine

Legislators moving environment in Maine
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Angus S. King, Jr.
Angus S. King, Jr. Senate
I
Support
76% 233
Chellie Pingree
Chellie Pingree House · District 1
D
Support
67% 297
Susan M. Collins
Susan M. Collins Senate
R
Oppose
25% 235
Jared F. Golden
Jared F. Golden House · District 2
D
Mixed −
48% 295
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All environment bills

in committee · United States · House Feb 4, 2026

HR 3699: Energy Choice Act

This bill prevents state or local governments from banning or restricting energy connections (like installation, modification, or access) based on the type or source of energy, such as electricity, natural gas, or renewable fuels. It directly affects consumers choosing energy providers and energy companies seeking to offer services. The key provision prohibits local laws, regulations, or policies that limit energy services sold in interstate commerce, covering all energy types listed in the bill’s definitions. It does not create new programs but limits regulatory authority at the state or local level. The law aims to ensure open access to diverse energy sources without source-based restrictions.
Sub-Topics Oil & Gas
in committee · United States · House Jan 23, 2025

HR 674: Northeast Fisheries Heritage Protection Act of 2025

HR 674 prohibits new commercial offshore wind energy development in Lobster Management Area 1 (a specific fishing zone in the Gulf of Maine critical to the New England lobster and seafood industry). The bill directly affects commercial fishermen, seafood processors, and coastal communities dependent on this area’s fisheries, which support thousands of jobs and generate over $500 million annually in lobster harvest alone. Key provisions include banning new wind energy leases in the area and requiring a federal study within 120 days to evaluate how current environmental reviews for Gulf of Maine wind projects consider impacts on marine life, fishing industries, and coastal communities. The study will assess existing agency processes for reviewing wind projects, not change those processes.
in committee · United States · House Feb 12, 2025

HR 1267: Water Systems PFAS Liability Protection Act

HR 1267, the Water Systems PFAS Liability Protection Act, exempts certain water and wastewater treatment facilities from liability under the federal environmental cleanup law (CERCLA) for releases of specific PFAS chemicals. It directly affects public water systems, wastewater treatment plants, municipalities with stormwater permits, and their contractors who handle PFAS while following all applicable laws. The exemption applies only if facilities manage PFAS in compliance with existing federal or state water quality rules, such as through proper biosolids disposal or treated water discharge under permits. However, the bill does not protect facilities that act with gross negligence or willful misconduct in handling PFAS. This law changes liability rules for water systems but does not alter PFAS regulation standards.
passed · United States · House Dec 18, 2025

HR 4776: SPEED Act

The SPEED Act reforms the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to streamline federal environmental reviews for projects. It limits agencies to considering only "proximate" environmental effects directly tied to a specific project (not speculative or distant impacts), sets strict 180-day deadlines for court remands, and restricts judicial review to procedural errors - not environmental outcomes. This primarily affects federal agencies (like the EPA or Corps of Engineers) and project developers (e.g., for infrastructure, energy, or construction projects) by reducing review scope and accelerating approvals. The bill clarifies NEPA is purely procedural, prohibiting courts from substituting their judgment on environmental effects or delaying actions for new scientific data after deadlines.