Sen. Mike Lee

Maddy summaryS 530, the WEST Act of 2025, repeals a specific Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rule titled "Conservation and Landscape Health" (88 Fed. Reg. 19583, April 3, 2023). The bill directly affects the BLM by nullifying the legal force of this 2023 regulation. It contains no new provisions or policy changes, only the repeal of an existing rule. This is a procedural legislative action with no direct impact on the public, businesses, or other entities.

Maddy summaryThis joint resolution proposes a constitutional amendment to permanently set the number of justices on the Supreme Court at nine. It would require the Supreme Court to always consist of exactly nine justices, directly affecting the Court's composition. The amendment would become part of the Constitution only if ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures within seven years. This is a procedural change to the Constitution's structure, not a policy affecting other areas.

Maddy summaryThis joint resolution (SJRES 17) seeks to block a specific rule issued by the U.S. Forest Service under the Department of Agriculture. The rule, published in the Federal Register on November 25, 2024, established new criminal prohibitions related to law enforcement activities on federal lands. If passed, this resolution would formally disapprove the rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, making the rule legally ineffective and preventing it from taking effect. The resolution directly affects the Forest Service's ability to enforce this particular criminal prohibition rule.

Maddy summaryThe BOWSER Act (S 440) would repeal the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, ending the District's locally elected government. If enacted, it would eliminate the authority of the District's mayor, city council, and local laws, transferring control of D.C. governance entirely to Congress. The repeal would take effect one year after the bill is signed into law. This change would directly affect all residents of Washington, D.C., who would lose their locally elected representatives and decision-making power over local affairs.

Maddy summaryThis bill amends the existing Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act of 2004 to add the State of Utah as an eligible participant for the federal wildfire research institute. It updates two sections of the law: first, by adding Utah to the list of states eligible under Section 5(b)(2), and second, by including Utah alongside Colorado in Section 5(e)(1). The bill directly affects Utah by enabling the state to participate in the existing federal wildfire research program. This is a procedural change to expand eligibility, not a new program or funding mechanism.

Maddy summaryS 464, the "No CBDC Act," prohibits the Federal Reserve, Treasury, and other federal agencies from creating, issuing, or offering central bank digital currency (CBDC) directly to individuals or through intermediaries like banks. It bans these entities from maintaining individual accounts for digital currency, holding government-issued digital money on their balance sheets, or offering related financial services. The bill directly affects federal financial institutions by blocking all federal involvement in developing a government-run digital currency system. It focuses on preventing the U.S. government from entering the digital currency market, rather than regulating private digital assets.

Maddy summaryThis bill amends the CARES Act by removing subsection (c) of Section 4024. It does not create new policies or directly affect any specific group; it only modifies an existing provision in federal law. The change is purely procedural, eliminating a specific subsection without altering the law's overall structure or requirements. No new rules or impacts on housing are introduced. (1 sentence, as it is a procedural amendment).

Maddy summaryThis bill (S 484) amends the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) to allow gun manufacturers, sellers, and trade associations to move certain lawsuits filed against them from state courts to federal courts. Specifically, it permits these defendants to request removal to federal court if they claim a case is covered by PLCAA, which shields gun companies from liability for gun-related harms. The federal court would then decide if the case qualifies under PLCAA and dismiss it if it does. This change directly affects gun companies defending lawsuits and plaintiffs seeking redress in state courts, shifting jurisdiction to federal courts for these specific cases.

Maddy summaryThis bill would require federal agencies to submit detailed reports about new regulations to Congress before they take effect. Major rules (defined as those with an annual economic effect of $100 million or more, or significant effects on competition, employment, or public safety) would need congressional approval via a joint resolution before taking effect, with Congress having 70 days to act. Nonmajor rules would have a different, shorter review process. The bill would also require agencies to publish cost-benefit analyses and other supporting documentation, and would mandate that rules be reviewed and potentially reapproved after 10 years.

Mandatory Removal Proceedings Act This bill requires the immediate initiation of removal proceedings against a non-U.S. national ( alien under federal law) whose visa is revoked on security and related grounds.