Issue · Energy

Energy (Renewable Energy)

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in Connecticut, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
1
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Tony Hwang
100% support rate
Top opponent
Bob Duff
12% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving renewable energy in Connecticut

Legislators moving renewable energy in Connecticut
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Tony Hwang
Tony Hwang Senate · District 28
R
Strong +
100% 8
John Kissel
John Kissel Senate · District 7
R
Strong +
100% 7
Eric Berthel
Eric Berthel Senate · District 32
R
Strong +
88% 8
Heather Somers
Heather Somers Senate · District 18
R
Strong +
88% 8
Henri Martin
Henri Martin Senate · District 31
R
Strong +
88% 8
Bob Duff
Bob Duff Senate · District 25
D
Strong −
12% 8
Ceci Maher
Ceci Maher Senate · District 26
D
Strong −
12% 8
Christine Cohen
Christine Cohen Senate · District 12
D
Strong −
12% 8
Derek Slap
Derek Slap Senate · District 5
D
Strong −
12% 8
Doug McCrory
Doug McCrory Senate · District 2
D
Strong −
12% 8
Showing 1 of 1 bills

All energy bills

in committee · Connecticut · Senate Apr 7, 2026

SB 422: AN ACT CONCERNING BIOMASS FACILITIES.

This bill redefines how biomass facilities are classified under Connecticut's renewable energy laws by removing them from the list of Class I renewable energy sources. The change directly affects biomass power plants that currently qualify for renewable energy credits and incentives, as well as electric distribution companies and suppliers that purchase their energy. Key provisions include deleting biomass from the statutory definition of Class I renewable energy and establishing a new process for the state energy commissioner to solicit additional power purchase agreements from eligible biomass facilities that meet specific emission and capacity criteria. These eligible facilities must use sustainable biomass fuel, maintain low nitrogen oxide emissions, or have small capacity and pre-2003 construction dates. The bill also clarifies that biomass facilities with existing contracts before 2024 may continue under those agreements, while new contracts must follow state procurement rules and prioritize ratepayer interests.