Issue · Technology

Technology (Social Media)

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Christopher Cabaldon
100% support rate
Top opponent
Ali Macedo
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving social media in California

Legislators moving social media in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Christopher Cabaldon
Christopher Cabaldon Senate · District 3
D
Strong +
100% 16
Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
100% 14
Gail Pellerin
Gail Pellerin House · District 28
D
Strong +
100% 14
Isaac Bryan
Isaac Bryan House · District 55
D
Strong +
100% 14
Buffy Wicks
Buffy Wicks House · District 14
D
Strong +
100% 13
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
0% 13
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 12
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
0% 11
Carl DeMaio
Carl DeMaio House · District 75
R
Strong −
0% 10
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 9
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All technology bills

passed · California · Assembly Aug 24, 2026

HR 140: Relative to Children's Get Offline and Get Outdoors Month.

California Assembly Resolution 140 designates August 2026 as Children's Get Offline and Get Outdoors Month to promote awareness of the benefits of screen-free play for child development. The resolution cites research linking excessive social media use and reduced free play time to increased rates of anxiety, depression, and other behavioral issues among teenagers. It encourages families and communities to support unstructured outdoor activities and highlights ongoing federal efforts to protect children's mental health through technology guardrails.
passed · California · Assembly Aug 6, 2026

HR 117: Relative to Section 230 of the federal Communications Decency Act of 1996.

This House Resolution from the California Legislature calls for a federal review of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. The bill argues that the current law, which protects online platforms from liability for third-party content, has become outdated and allows major technology companies to avoid responsibility for harmful user-generated material. It highlights that courts have used this provision to shield platforms from legal action in cases involving harassment, illegal sales, and other serious harms. The resolution contends that the law should be reformed to hold companies accountable for their design choices and content moderation practices while still encouraging them to remove objectionable material.
Sub-Topics Social Media
failed · California · Senate Feb 2, 2026

SB 637: Consumer review platforms.

Existing law prohibits a contract, or proposed contract, for the sale or lease of consumer goods or services from including a provision waiving the consumer's right to make a statement regarding the seller or lessor, or its employees or agents, or concerning the goods or services. This bill would prohibit a business from making a consumer review platform available in the state that does not allow a business to opt out of being the subject of consumer reviews or consumer testimonials on the consumer review platform. The bill would define "consumer review platform" to mean an online platform, or a portion of an online platform, that is dedicated to enabling a consumer to see or hear consumer reviews of, or consumer testimonials with respect to, particular businesses that consumers have submitted to the online platform.