Issue · Technology

Technology (Data Privacy)

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
42
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Gail Pellerin
100% support rate
Top opponent
Ali Macedo
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving data privacy in California

Legislators moving data privacy in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Gail Pellerin
Gail Pellerin House · District 28
D
Strong +
100% 50
Buffy Wicks
Buffy Wicks House · District 14
D
Strong +
100% 48
Isaac Bryan
Isaac Bryan House · District 55
D
Strong +
100% 46
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan House · District 16
D
Strong +
100% 43
Chris Ward
Chris Ward House · District 78
D
Strong +
100% 40
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
0% 48
Carl DeMaio
Carl DeMaio House · District 75
R
Strong −
0% 38
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 36
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 33
Tri Ta
Tri Ta House · District 70
R
Strong −
0% 28
Showing 41–42 of 42 bills

All technology bills

signed · California · Assembly Oct 8, 2025

AB 566: California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018: opt-out preference signal.

The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (CCPA) grants a consumer various rights with respect to personal information that is collected or sold by a business, as defined, including the right to direct a business that sells or shares personal information about the consumer to third parties not to sell or share the consumer's personal information, as specified. The California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, approved by the voters as Proposition 24 at the November 3, 2020, statewide general election, amended, added to, and reenacted the CCPA and establishes the California Privacy Protection Agency and vests the agency with full administrative power, authority, and jurisdiction to enforce the CCPA. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2027, prohibit a business from developing or maintaining a browser, as defined, that does not include functionality configurable by a consumer that enables the browser to send an opt-out preference signal, as defined, to businesses with which the consumer interacts through the browser, as prescribed. The bill would require a business that develops or maintains a browser to make clear to a consumer in its public disclosures how the opt-out preference signal works and the intended effect of the opt-out preference signal. The bill would grant a business that develops or maintains a browser that includes this functionality immunity from liability for a violation of those provisions by a business that receives the opt-out preference signal. The bill would authorize the agency to adopt regulations as necessary to implement and administer those provisions. This bill would declare that its provisions further the purposes and intent of the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020.
vetoed · California · Assembly Jan 22, 2026

AB 1064: Leading Ethical AI Development (LEAD) for Kids Act.

The California AI Transparency Act requires a person that creates, codes, or otherwise produces a generative artificial intelligence system that has over 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users and is publicly accessible within the geographic boundaries of the state to make available an AI detection tool at no cost to the user that, among other things, allows a user to assess whether image, video, or audio content, or content that is any combination thereof, was created or altered by the covered provider's generative artificial intelligence system. The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 prohibits certain businesses from selling or sharing the personal information of consumers if the business has actual knowledge that the consumer is less than 16 years of age, unless the consumer, if the consumer is at least 13 years of age and less than 16 years of age, or the consumer's parent or guardian, if the consumer is less than 13 years of age, has affirmatively authorized the sale or sharing of the consumer's personal information. This bill, the Leading Ethical AI Development (LEAD) for Kids Act, would, among other things related to the use of certain artificial intelligence systems by children, prohibit a person, partnership, corporation, business entity, or state or local government agency that makes a companion chatbot available to users from making a companion chatbot available to a child unless the companion chatbot is not foreseeably capable of doing certain things that could harm a child, including encouraging the child to engage in self-harm, suicidal ideation, violence, consumption of drugs or alcohol, or disordered eating. The act would authorize the Attorney General to recover a certain civil penalty for a violation of the bill, as prescribed. The act would authorize a child who suffers actual harm as a result of a violation of the bill, or a parent or guardian acting on behalf of that child, to bring a civil action to recover, among other relief, actual damages. This bill would provide that its provisions are severable.
Showing 41 to 42 of 42 bills
Previous 1 3 4 5