Issue · Technology

Technology (Social Media)

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
21
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Christopher Cabaldon
100% support rate
Top opponent
Ali Macedo
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving social media in California

Legislators moving social media in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Christopher Cabaldon
Christopher Cabaldon Senate · District 3
D
Strong +
100% 16
Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
100% 14
Gail Pellerin
Gail Pellerin House · District 28
D
Strong +
100% 14
Isaac Bryan
Isaac Bryan House · District 55
D
Strong +
100% 14
Buffy Wicks
Buffy Wicks House · District 14
D
Strong +
100% 13
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
0% 13
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 12
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
0% 11
Carl DeMaio
Carl DeMaio House · District 75
R
Strong −
0% 10
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 9
Showing 21–21 of 21 bills

All technology bills

signed · California · Assembly Oct 13, 2025

AB 853: California AI Transparency Act.

The California AI Transparency Act requires a person that creates, codes, or otherwise produces a generative artificial intelligence system that has over 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users and is publicly accessible within the geographic boundaries of the state to make available an AI detection tool at no cost to the user that, among other things, allows a user to assess whether image, video, or audio content, or content that is a combination thereof, was created or altered by that person's generative artificial intelligence system and outputs any system provenance data that is detected in the content. Existing law makes the California AI Transparency Act operative on January 1, 2026. This bill would delay the operation of the California AI Transparency Act until August 2, 2026. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2027, additionally require a large online platform, as defined, to, among other things related to the provenance of content on the platform, detect whether any provenance data that is compliant with widely adopted specifications adopted by an established standards-setting body is embedded into or attached to content distributed on the large online platform. The bill would also require, beginning January 1, 2028, a capture device manufacturer, with respect to any capture device the capture device manufacturer first produced for sale in the state on or after January 1, 2028, to, among other things, provide a user with the option to include a latent disclosure in content captured by the capture device that conveys certain information, including the name of the capture device manufacturer. The bill would define "capture device" to mean a device that can record photographs, audio, or video content, including, but not limited to, video and still photography cameras, mobile phones with built-in cameras or microphones, and voice recorders. Existing law requires a covered provider to include a latent disclosure in AI-generated image, video, or audio content, or content that is any combination thereof, created by the covered provider's GenAI system that, among other things, conveys certain information and is permanent or extraordinarily difficult to remove, to the extent it is technically feasible. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2027, prohibit a GenAI system hosting platform, as defined, from knowingly making available a GenAI system that does not place disclosures, pursuant to those provisions. This bill would declare that its provisions are severable.
Showing 21 to 21 of 21 bills