Issue · Immigration

Immigration (Enforcement)

Every immigration bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
33
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Laurie Davies
84% support rate
Top opponent
James Gallagher
29% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving enforcement in California

Legislators moving enforcement in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Laurie Davies
Laurie Davies House · District 74
R
Strong +
84% 19
Juan Alanis
Juan Alanis House · District 22
R
Strong +
84% 25
Greg Wallis
Greg Wallis House · District 47
R
Strong +
83% 24
Melissa Hurtado
Melissa Hurtado Senate · District 16
D
Strong +
80% 20
Catherine Blakespear
Catherine Blakespear Senate · District 38
D
Support
73% 22
James Gallagher
James Gallagher House · District 3
R
Oppose
29% 17
Steve Choi
Steve Choi Senate · District 37
R
Oppose
30% 27
Roger Niello
Roger Niello Senate · District 6
R
Oppose
33% 24
Marie Alvarado-Gil
Marie Alvarado-Gil Senate · District 4
R
Oppose
35% 23
Tony Strickland
Tony Strickland Senate · District 36
R
Oppose
36% 25
Showing 31–33 of 33 bills

All immigration bills

signed · California · Senate Oct 12, 2025

SB 580: Attorney General: immigration enforcement policies.

Existing law requires the Attorney General to develop model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, public libraries, courthouses, specified health facilities, shelters, and other specified state agencies. This bill would similarly require the Attorney General, on or before July 1, 2026, and in consultation with appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies relating to interaction with immigration enforcement, consistent with federal and state law, and to publish guidance and recommendations for databases operated by state and local agencies to limit the availability of information in those databases for the purposes of immigration enforcement, consistent with federal and state law. The bill would require state and local agencies to implement the model policies on or before January 1, 2027, as specified. By imposing new duties on local agencies, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would include findings that changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
signed · California · Senate Oct 12, 2025

SB 307: Public postsecondary education: immigration enforcement.

Existing law requires the Trustees of the California State University, the governing boards of community college districts, and independent institutions of higher education that are qualifying institutions for purposes of the Cal Grant Program, and requests the Regents of the University of California, to the fullest extent consistent with state and federal law, to implement various precautionary measures when federal immigration enforcement activities are undertaken on campuses of those segments, as specified. Existing law requires those precautionary measures to include, among other measures, that in the event that an undocumented student is detained, deported, or is unable to attend to their academic requirements due to the action of an immigration officer in relation to a federal immigration order, as specified, a requirement that the college or university make all reasonable efforts to assist the student in retaining any eligibility for financial aid, fellowship stipends, and exemptions from nonresident tuition fees, among other benefits the student has been awarded or received, and a requirement that the student be permitted to reenroll if and when the student is able to return to the college or university. This bill would require the Trustees of the California State University, and would request the Regents of the University of California, to implement additional precautionary measures, including, among others, requiring adoption of a systemwide policy addressing course grades, administrative withdrawal, and reenrollment for undocumented students who are unable to attend their courses by the final drop date due to immigration enforcement activity, as specified.
signed · California · Assembly Oct 12, 2025

AB 419: Educational equity: immigration enforcement.

Existing law prohibits, except as required by state or federal law or as required to administer a state or federally supported educational program, school officials and employees of a local educational agency from collecting information or documents regarding citizenship or immigration status of pupils or their family members. Existing law requires the governing board or body of a school district, county office of education, or charter school to perform specified actions relating to pupils and immigration status, including, among others, providing information to parents and guardians, as appropriate, regarding their children's right to a free public education, regardless of immigration status or religious beliefs. This bill would require the governing board or body of a local educational agency to post specified information related to immigration enforcement in the administrative buildings and on the internet websites of the local educational agency and each of its schoolsites, as provided. To the extent the bill imposes additional duties on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 234.7 of the Education Code proposed by AB 49 to be operative only if this bill and AB 49 are enacted and this bill is enacted last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Showing 31 to 33 of 33 bills
Previous 1 2 3 4