Issue · Environment

Environment (Forestry)

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Buffy Wicks
100% support rate
Top opponent
Kelly Seyarto
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving forestry in California

Legislators moving forestry in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Buffy Wicks
Buffy Wicks House · District 14
D
Strong +
100% 9
Gail Pellerin
Gail Pellerin House · District 28
D
Strong +
100% 9
Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
100% 8
Christopher Cabaldon
Christopher Cabaldon Senate · District 3
D
Strong +
100% 8
Isaac Bryan
Isaac Bryan House · District 55
D
Strong +
100% 8
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 7
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
0% 6
Carl DeMaio
Carl DeMaio House · District 75
R
Strong −
0% 6
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 6
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
0% 6
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All environment bills

passed both · California · Assembly Aug 24, 2026

AB 442: Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973: working forest management plans: nonindustrial timber management plans.

Under the Z'berg-Nejedly Forest Practice Act of 1973, the Legislature finds and declares that it is the policy of the state to encourage prudent and responsible forest management of nonindustrial timberlands by approving working forest management plans in advance. Existing law regulates nonindustrial tree farmers and working forest landowners for timberland management purposes, including by setting a maximum acreage each may own, and authorizes a person who intends to become a nonindustrial tree farmer or a working forest landowner to submit to the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection a nonindustrial timber management plan or a working forest harvest plan, respectively, regarding that acreage. Existing law provides a maximum of 2,500 acres owned for nonindustrial tree farmers and nonindustrial timber management plans and a maximum of 10,000 acres owned for working forest landowners and working forest management plans. This bill would increase the maximum acreage for nonindustrial tree farmers and nonindustrial management plans to 4,000 acres and for working forest landowners and working forest management plans to 15,000 acres. Existing law requires the harvest area of a working forest management plan to be contained within a single hydrological area, as defined. This bill would eliminate the requirement that the harvest area of a working forest management plan be contained within a single hydrological area. Existing law requires the working forest landowner who owns, leases, or otherwise controls or operates on all or any portion of any timberland within the boundaries of an approved working forest management plan, and who plans to harvest any of the timber during a given year, to file a working forest harvest notice, as defined, with the department in writing. Existing law exempts the Southern Subdistrict of the Coast Forest District, as described in regulations, from these provisions regarding working forest management plans. This bill would eliminate this exemption.
Sub-Topics Conservation Forestry
passed · California · Assembly Jul 16, 2025

AB 66: California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: egress route projects: fire safety.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would, until January 1, 2032, exempt from CEQA egress route projects undertaken by a public agency to improve emergency access to and evacuation from a subdivision without a secondary egress route if the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection has recommended the creation of a secondary access to the subdivision and certain conditions are met. The bill would require the lead agency to hold a noticed public meeting to hear and respond to public comments before determining that a project is exempt. The bill would require the lead agency, if it determines that a project is not subject to CEQA and approves or carries out that project, to file a notice of exemption with the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and with the clerk of the county in which the project will be located.
Sub-Topics Forestry