Issue · Energy

Energy

Every energy bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jesse Arreguín
96% support rate
Top opponent
Tony Strickland
7% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving energy in California

Legislators moving energy in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
JA
Jesse Arreguín Senate · District 7
D
Strong +
96% 299
Juan Carrillo
Juan Carrillo House · District 39
D
Strong +
96% 188
Bob Archuleta
Bob Archuleta Senate · District 30
D
Strong +
96% 271
Aisha Wahab
Aisha Wahab Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
95% 344
Esmeralda Soria
Esmeralda Soria House · District 27
D
Strong +
95% 155
Tony Strickland
Tony Strickland Senate · District 36
R
Strong −
7% 263
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
8% 246
Marie Alvarado-Gil
Marie Alvarado-Gil Senate · District 4
R
Strong −
9% 178
Roger Niello
Roger Niello Senate · District 6
R
Strong −
11% 217
Brian Jones
Brian Jones Senate · District 40
R
Strong −
11% 177
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All energy bills

passed both · California · Assembly Aug 28, 2026

AB 40: California Environmental Quality Act: environmental impact reports: coal handling, storage, and export.

The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA provides that when an EIR has been prepared for a project, no subsequent or supplemental EIR shall be required by a lead agency or responsible agency, unless specified events occur. This bill would require a lead agency, before issuing the initial discretionary approval for a large-volume bulk coal facility, defined as a facility with a design capacity exceeding 5,000,000 short tons per year of coal handling, storage, or export to prepare or cause to be prepared an EIR. The bill would prohibit a lead agency, air pollution control district, or air quality management district from relying on an existing EIR to issue a discretionary approval for, or to, a large-volume bulk coal facility, and would require a subsequent or new EIR to be prepared, if any of a list of specified conditions are met, including that there is an increase in design capacity of a project that did not previously meet the definition of a large-volume bulk coal facility, as provided; there is a change in the type of coal handled, stored, or exported, or the EIR did not explicitly address the type of coal handled, stored, or exported; or there is a significant increase in the quantity of coal handled, stored, or exported, or the EIR did not explicitly disclose the quantity of coal to be handled, stored, or exported. The bill would require an EIR or subsequent EIR prepared pursuant to these provisions to, among other things, evaluate the large-volume bulk coal facility's potential to generate PM2.5 and PM10 fugitive dust emissions during construction and operations, and to require mitigation measures, as provided. The bill would apply these provisions to a discretionary approval that is pending or made after June 4, 2026, as specified. Because the bill would create new duties for a lead agency, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
signed · California · Senate Aug 11, 2026

SJR 12: Proposed 2026–2031 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program: opposition.

This measure would request that the federal Bureau of Ocean Energy Management hold public hearings in California on the proposed 2026–2031 National Outer Continental Shelf Oil and Gas Leasing Program, prepare an environmental impact statement to accompany the program, and provide the public the opportunity to comment on a draft programmatic environmental impact statement for potential offshore oil and gas leasing in California. The measure would strongly and unequivocally oppose any new offshore drilling and declare unequivocal support for the current federal prohibition on new oil or gas drilling in federal waters offshore of the Pacific coast.