Issue · Education

Education

Every education bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Pilar Schiavo
100% support rate
Top opponent
Natasha Johnson
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving education in California

Legislators moving education in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Pilar Schiavo
Pilar Schiavo House · District 40
D
Strong +
100% 467
Cottie Petrie-Norris
Cottie Petrie-Norris House · District 73
D
Strong +
100% 451
Eloise Reyes
Eloise Reyes Senate · District 29
D
Strong +
100% 393
Ash Kalra
Ash Kalra House · District 25
D
Strong +
99% 609
Catherine Stefani
Catherine Stefani House · District 19
D
Strong +
99% 603
Natasha Johnson
Natasha Johnson House · District 63
R
Strong −
0% 329
Stan Ellis
Stan Ellis House · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 504
James Gallagher
James Gallagher House · District 3
R
Strong −
2% 324
Ali Macedo
Ali Macedo House · District 33
R
Strong −
3% 580
Roger Niello
Roger Niello Senate · District 6
R
Strong −
4% 487
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All education bills

signed · California · Assembly Oct 13, 2025

AB 681: California DREAM Loan Program: limits.

Existing law establishes the California DREAM Loan Program, which authorizes a student attending a participating campus of the University of California or California State University to receive a loan, referred to as a DREAM loan, if the student satisfies certain requirements. Existing law prohibits a student from borrowing more than $4,000 within a single academic year and more than $40,000 in the aggregate under the program. Existing law prohibits a student enrolled in an undergraduate program from borrowing more than $20,000 as an undergraduate student and prohibits a student enrolled in a graduate program from borrowing more than $20,000 as a graduate student. This bill would instead prohibit a student enrolled in an undergraduate program from borrowing more than $4,000 within a single academic year, and a student enrolled in a graduate program from borrowing more than $20,500 within a single academic year. The bill would increase the aggregate limit under the program for a student enrolled in a graduate program to $118,500 as a graduate student, while maintaining the $20,000 aggregate limit under the program for a student enrolled in an undergraduate program, thereby increasing the overall aggregate limit under the program for a student who receives a DREAM loan for both undergraduate and graduate enrollment to $138,500.
passed · California · Senate Sep 13, 2025

SB 494: Charter schools: establishment prohibition and renewal procedures.

(1) Existing law, the Charter Schools Act of 1992, authorizes the establishment, operation, and governance of charter schools. Existing law authorizes a charter school that has an approved charter to receive funding for nonclassroom-based instruction only if a determination for funding is made by the State Board of Education, as specified. The act prohibits, from January 1, 2020, to January 1, 2026, inclusive, the approval of a petition for the establishment of a new charter school offering nonclassroom-based instruction, as specified. This bill would extend that prohibition to continue through January 1, 2027. (2) Existing law, until January 1, 2026, sets out performance standards and procedures for the renewal of the charter of an existing charter school, including, among other things, the use of verified data, as provided. Existing law sets out revised standards and procedures that are operative on and after January 1, 2026, that, among other things, no longer requires a chartering authority to use verified data and instead requires a chartering authority to use only the data reported on the California School Dashboard in making a renewal decision, as provided. This bill would extend, until January 1, 2027, the operation of the performance standards and procedures for the renewal of charter schools that would otherwise be inoperative on January 1, 2026, and would delay the operation of the revised standards and procedures until January 1, 2027. To the extent the bill imposes new duties on local educational agencies acting as chartering authorities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.