Issue · Criminal Justice

Criminal Justice (Policing)

Every criminal justice bill, vote, and legislator stance in California, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Mark González
100% support rate
Top opponent
Kelly Seyarto
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving policing in California

Legislators moving policing in California
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
MG
Mark González House · District 54
D
Strong +
100% 12
John Harabedian
John Harabedian House · District 41
D
Strong +
100% 9
Nick Schultz
Nick Schultz House · District 44
D
Strong +
100% 9
Stephanie Nguyen
Stephanie Nguyen House · District 10
D
Strong +
100% 9
Buffy Wicks
Buffy Wicks House · District 14
D
Strong +
100% 8
Kelly Seyarto
Kelly Seyarto Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
0% 10
David Tangipa
David Tangipa House · District 8
R
Strong −
0% 8
Diane Dixon
Diane Dixon House · District 72
R
Strong −
0% 8
Joshua Hoover
Joshua Hoover House · District 7
R
Strong −
0% 8
Tri Ta
Tri Ta House · District 70
R
Strong −
0% 8
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All criminal justice bills

in committee · California · Senate Aug 11, 2026

SR 138: Relative to the Democratic Socialists of America.

This California Senate resolution formally expresses disagreement with the policy platform of the Democratic Socialists of America, arguing that its proposals would undermine economic growth, fiscal sustainability, and public safety. The bill cites historical examples of socialist governments to support its position that expanding government control over the economy threatens individual liberty and private property rights. It further asserts that DSA advocacy for abolishing police and prisons poses risks to community safety and law and order. Finally, the resolution reaffirms the Senate's commitment to addressing housing affordability through increased supply and regulatory streamlining, while promoting effective law enforcement and free enterprise principles.
in committee · California · Assembly May 14, 2026

AB 1727: Crimes: theft of DNA.

Existing law, the Genetic Information Privacy Act, requires a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company, as defined, to provide a consumer with certain information regarding the company's policies and procedures for the collection, use, maintenance, and disclosure, as applicable, of genetic data, and to obtain a consumer's express consent for collection, use, or disclosure of the consumer's genetic data, as specified. Existing law assesses a civil penalty not to exceed $1,000 for a negligent violation of these provisions, and a civil penalty between $1,000 and $10,000, inclusive, for a willful violation of these provisions. This bill would require all local law enforcement agencies in the state to report to the Attorney General starting July 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, the number of reports filed in the past year on the theft of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and the current status of those cases. The bill would require the Attorney General to, on or before January 1, 2028, report to the Legislature, and post on its internet website, the number of police reports filed on the theft of DNA and the current status of those cases. By increasing duties on local law enforcement, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
failed · California · Assembly Feb 2, 2026

AB 355: Crimes: extortion.

Existing law defines extortion as the obtaining of property from another, with consent, or the obtaining of an official act of a public officer, induced by a wrongful use of force or fear, or under color of official right. Existing law further provides that fear sufficient to constitute extortion may be induced by certain threats, including a threat to accuse the threatened individual, or the individual's relative or family, of a crime. This bill would provide that a threat to post, distribute, or create AI-generated images or videos of another may also induce fear sufficient to constitute extortion. By expanding the crime of extortion, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Sub-Topics Policing