Issue · Healthcare

Healthcare

Every healthcare bill, vote, and legislator stance in Arizona, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
14
57th Legislature - Second Regular Session
Top supporter
Kevin Payne
81% support rate
Top opponent
Michael Way
24% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving healthcare in Arizona

Legislators moving healthcare in Arizona
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Kevin Payne
Kevin Payne Senate · District 27
R
Strong +
81% 73
Hildy Angius
Hildy Angius Senate · District 30
R
Support
79% 78
T.J. Shope
T.J. Shope Senate · District 16
R
Support
79% 78
Tim Dunn
Tim Dunn Senate · District 25
R
Support
79% 78
Vince Leach
Vince Leach Senate · District 17
R
Support
79% 78
Michael Way
Michael Way House · District 15
R
Oppose
24% 82
Justin Olson
Justin Olson House · District 10
R
Oppose
27% 92
Khyl Powell
Khyl Powell House · District 14
R
Oppose
27% 92
Rachel Keshel
Rachel Keshel House · District 17
R
Oppose
28% 87
Alex Kolodin
Alex Kolodin House · District 3
R
Oppose
30% 90
Showing 11–14 of 14 bills

All healthcare bills

vetoed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2584: public monies; genetic sequencing; prohibition

HB 2584 amends Arizona law governing state health insurance funding for public employees. It sets monthly spending limits for state-provided health coverage: $500 per individual, $1,200 per married couple (both state employees), or $1,200 per family (one employee spouse). The bill requires the Department of Administration to offer various plan types (including HMOs and indemnity plans) and mandates self-insurance programs include specific protections like grievance procedures and quality standards. It directly affects all full-time state employees and their dependents by defining how public funds can cover their health insurance. The bill does not address genetic sequencing, as suggested by its title.
signed · Arizona · House Apr 1, 2026

HB 2072: lactation care providers; certification

HB 2072 establishes a voluntary certification program for lactation care providers in Arizona. It creates a "state-certified lactation care provider" designation requiring applicants to hold an existing approved certification (like IBCLC or indigenous certification), meet age and fingerprinting requirements, and pay fees. The Department of Health Services will administer the program, including setting scope of practice standards and handling renewals, while the bill explicitly states certification is not mandatory for practice. The law also prohibits government preference for certified providers in public contracts and creates an advisory committee of lactation providers to assist with rule development.
passed · Arizona · House Mar 25, 2026

HCR 2056: medical mandates; right to refuse

This Arizona constitutional amendment (HCR 2056) would recognize and protect an individual's fundamental right to refuse any medical treatment, product, or mandate - including those tied to employment, education, or public access - without government coercion. It prohibits government entities from forcing medical interventions (like vaccinations or implants) as a condition for benefits, rights, or services, but includes key exceptions: court-ordered treatment for mental health risks, law enforcement custody, parental decisions for minors, emergency life-saving care, and federal or existing state requirements. The bill defines "coerce or compel" as imposing penalties or denying benefits for noncompliance. If approved by voters, it would amend Arizona's constitution, making this right enforceable.
passed · Arizona · House Mar 10, 2026

HB 2833: mandatory reporting; violent threats; minors

HB 2833 requires certain professionals - including doctors, teachers, social workers, and child welfare staff - to report suspected abuse, violent threats, or neglect involving minors to child safety authorities or law enforcement. It expands mandatory reporting to cover threats of death or serious injury, physical injury not explained by medical history, and denial of necessary medical care, while exempting clergy from reporting confessions (but not personal observations of harm). Reports must be made immediately with details like the minor’s identity and incident specifics, and the law includes limited exemptions for consensual minor-on-minor interactions and accidental playground injuries. This bill directly affects minors at risk of harm and the professionals legally obligated to report such incidents.
Showing 11 to 14 of 14 bills