Healthcare

signed · Arizona · Senate Jun 22, 2026

SB 1630: home; community-based services; mental illness

SB 1630 establishes a new Arizona Medicaid program providing home and community-based services for adults with serious mental illness, replacing institutional care when possible. It sets eligibility based on clinical criteria (like recent hospitalizations, medication complexity, or safety risks) and income limits (300% of federal SSI), with options for a qualified income trust to meet financial requirements. Covered services include personal care, medication management, supervised community living, adult day health, and nonemergency transportation. The program requires federal approval by 2027 and aims to support individuals in community settings while avoiding psychiatric hospital or residential facility placement.

Topics ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareCreates new Medicaid program for community-based mental health services, replacing institutional care and expanding access to covered services like medication management.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Healthcare

signed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 4010: genetic counselors; board; licensure

HB 4010 establishes a Board of Genetic Counselors in Arizona to license and regulate genetic counselors. The bill defines "genetic counseling" and requires practitioners to obtain a license from this new board, which will protect the public by setting standards for practice and handling disciplinary actions. The board will consist of five licensed genetic counselors, two public members, and two physician members who interact professionally with counselors. This law directly affects genetic counselors seeking to practice in Arizona and ensures they meet specific certification and conduct standards before providing services.

Topics ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareEstablishes licensing board for genetic counselors to set practice standards and protect public health, aligning with healthcare quality protection and professional regulation.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Healthcare

signed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1814: substance use disorder treatment; committee

SB 1814 establishes a temporary study committee to examine Arizona's substance use disorder treatment system. The committee, composed of legislators, health officials, clinicians, and individuals with lived experience, will study treatment availability, gaps in care, regulatory loopholes, and workforce needs. It must report by December 31, 2027, with recommendations for evidence-based standards, oversight reforms, and funding strategies. The committee expires on June 30, 2028, and does not enact new laws.

Topics ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareBill creates study committee to examine substance use disorder treatment gaps and recommend evidence-based standards/funding strategies, directly advancing healthcare access and system improvements.92% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Healthcare

vetoed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1214: stem cells; birth tissue; therapy

SB 1214 restricts Arizona physicians from using stem cells or birth tissue derived from aborted fetuses or embryos for therapy. It allows non-FDA-approved stem cell or birth tissue therapies only for orthopedics, wound care, or pain management, provided the cells come from FDA-registered or certified facilities (like blood banks or tissue banks) and meet specific safety and viability standards. The bill requires physicians to disclose in advertising and obtain detailed informed consent stating the therapy isn't FDA-approved, and mandates facilities to provide full certification details to physicians. These provisions directly affect medical providers, clinics, and tissue suppliers offering such therapies in Arizona.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareRestricts embryonic stem cell therapies, limits treatment options, and imposes strict FDA requirements, restricting patient access to certain medical therapies.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Healthcare

Track

signed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1165: insurance; cost sharing; breast exams

SB 1165 prohibits Arizona health insurance plans (including hospital service corporations and health care service organizations) from charging cost-sharing fees (like deductibles or copays) for diagnostic and supplemental breast exams starting January 1, 2027. Diagnostic exams cover evaluations of abnormalities found during screenings or other tests, while supplemental exams are risk-based screenings for individuals with dense breasts, family history, or other factors. The bill requires insurers to cover these exams without cost-sharing even before a high-deductible plan’s deductible is met, aligning with National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. It directly affects insurance providers and beneficiaries seeking these specific breast cancer screening services.

Topics ✓ HealthcareSupports HealthcareProhibits cost-sharing for breast exams, expanding insurance coverage and improving patient access to preventive care without out-of-pocket costs.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✗ Voted No ✗ Opposes Healthcare

signed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1345: health facilities; anonymous complaints; prohibition

SB 1345 restricts Arizona health agencies from accepting or investigating anonymous complaints against healthcare facilities, requiring complaints to come directly from the person affected by the issue or from a witness to the alleged conduct. This bill directly affects the Arizona Department of Health Services and the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System, which handle facility complaints. The key provision prohibits anonymous complaints unless they originate from the subject of the allegation or a witness, eliminating the ability to file anonymous reports. The bill does not change healthcare standards or funding but alters the complaint process for state oversight agencies.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareRestricts anonymous complaints against health facilities, limiting patient reporting mechanisms and weakening oversight of healthcare providers per bill's core provision.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Healthcare

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2248: medical interventions; prohibition

Arizona's HB 2248, titled the "Arizona Medical Freedom Act," bans businesses, schools, and government entities from requiring medical interventions (like vaccines or treatments) as a condition for services, employment, school attendance, or access to facilities. It specifically prohibits: denying services or entry based on vaccination status, requiring interventions for employment (except for foreign travel requirements), or offering different pay based on whether someone has received a medical intervention. The law includes exceptions for standard workplace safety equipment under industry standards (but excludes pandemic-era mandates like mask requirements) and does not apply to schools operating under parental rights laws. Violations can be enforced by the attorney general, who may seek court orders and recover legal fees.

Topics ✗ EducationOpposes EducationProhibits schools from requiring medical interventions (e.g., vaccines) for attendance, removing a mandatory policy affecting student access and school requirements.90% confidence ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareBans mandatory medical interventions (e.g., vaccines), restricting public health enforcement and access requirements.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Healthcare

Track

vetoed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1095: gender transition; minors; prohibitions

SB 1095 prohibits health professionals in Arizona from providing gender transition procedures, irreversible gender reassignment surgery, or referrals for such procedures to individuals under 18 years old. The bill allows exceptions for medical conditions like disorders of sex development (e.g., XX virilization or XY undervirilization) or treatments for infections, injuries, or life-threatening conditions. It also bans the use of public funds for gender transition procedures for minors in state-run facilities or by state-employed health professionals. The law establishes disciplinary action for violations and allows individuals to seek legal remedies for noncompliance.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareProhibits gender transition procedures for minors, restricting access to healthcare services for this population under specific medical exceptions.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Healthcare

Track

vetoed · Arizona · Senate Jun 19, 2026

SB 1015: gender transition procedures; provider liability

SB 1015 would make healthcare providers personally liable for costs related to detransition procedures (reversing gender transition) for minors within 25 years of the initial treatment. It allows minors to sue providers for injuries (including psychological harm) up to age 26, covering medical costs, pain and suffering, and attorney fees. The bill prohibits providers from using contracts to waive this liability, stating such waivers violate Arizona's public policy. This directly affects minors receiving gender transition care and the healthcare professionals providing it, imposing long-term financial and legal responsibility on providers.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareImposes liability on providers for detransition costs, increasing legal risk and likely restricting access to gender-affirming care for minors.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Healthcare

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2086: vaccination mandates; masks; prohibition

HB 2086 prohibits Arizona state and local governments, as well as businesses, from requiring residents to wear masks or receive COVID-19 vaccinations (or variants) for entry or employment. The bill specifically bans mask mandates except for pre-existing workplace safety measures and prohibits vaccination requirements for COVID-19, with exceptions for government-owned healthcare facilities. It applies to all state/local government entities using tax revenues and businesses operating in Arizona, removing existing mandates without creating new requirements. The law directly affects residents, businesses, and government operations by eliminating these specific public health measures.

Topics ✗ HealthcareOpposes HealthcareProhibits mandatory vaccination/mask requirements, restricting public health measures for disease control in non-healthcare settings.90% confidence ✗ Labor & EmploymentOpposes Labor & EmploymentProhibits vaccination requirements for employment, weakening workplace safety measures tied to health mandates.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Healthcare

Track