Environment

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCM 2009: subsurface minerals; access; federal policy

HCM 2009 is a memorial from Arizona's legislature requesting the federal government to address barriers to accessing subsurface minerals (like copper) under federal land withdrawals, such as national monuments in Arizona. It asks Congress to amend the Antiquities Act to require state consent for new monuments, compensate Arizona for inaccessible mineral rights, and streamline mining permits. The memorial also seeks to rescind specific federal regulations (43 CFR 3809) that Arizona claims incorrectly treat patented surface lands as public lands, complicating mineral exploration. This would primarily affect Arizona's state land department and private mineral exploration companies by reducing regulatory hurdles to develop critical minerals.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRequests deregulation of mining access on federal lands by amending Antiquities Act and rescinding regulations, prioritizing mineral extraction over environmental protections.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 20, 2026

HCM 2006: endangered species act; urging reform

This Arizona legislative memorial (HCM 2006) urges federal agencies and Congress to reform the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Migratory Bird Conservation Act. It requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Forest Service reduce regulatory burdens on ranchers and prevent lease cancellations on federally managed grazing lands due to ESA implementation. The memorial specifically cites concerns about ranchers being unfairly evicted from grazing lands and seeks to align federal policy with "long-standing agricultural practices" in Arizona. As a non-binding memorial, it does not directly change laws but formally requests federal action to address these specific impacts on rural ranching communities.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill explicitly urges reform to reduce ESA regulatory burdens on ranchers and prevent lease cancellations due to ESA implementation, directly weakening environmental protections.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 20, 2026

HCM 2011: Mexican wolf; delist; urging support

This Arizona state memorial (HCM 2011) urges Congress to delist the Mexican wolf from the federal endangered species list. It claims the wolf population has exceeded recovery goals since 2014 (286 wild wolves in 2024) and no longer requires ESA protections. The memorial specifically requests Congress pass H.R. 4255 to remove the wolf from the list, defund the federal reintroduction project, transfer management to states, and ensure full compensation for ranchers' livestock losses. It does not create new law but advocates for policy changes to end federal management of the species.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentUrges delisting Mexican wolf from ESA, defunding federal protections, and transferring management to states - directly weakens endangered species conservation under the Endangered Species Act.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

signed · Arizona · Senate Apr 15, 2026

SB 1503: public pensions; proxy voting

SB 1503 requires Arizona public pension funds to vote shares solely in the economic interest of plan participants and beneficiaries, directly affecting state-run pension managers and proxy advisory firms. It mandates that if a pension fund votes against a company's board recommendation (with majority independent directors), it must provide a documented economic analysis proving the vote aligns with financial goals, not environmental or ideological aims. Funds must annually report such votes and analyses to the state treasurer and back-test their economic models every three years to ensure accuracy. The bill prohibits using votes to advance non-financial goals unless an economic analysis confirms financial benefits, with strict certification requirements for all documentation.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesRequires economic analysis for pension votes, promoting fiscal responsibility in state fund management per bill's mandate to align with financial goals over ideology.85% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill explicitly prohibits pension funds from considering environmental factors in voting decisions, restricting environmental considerations from influencing investment choices.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

passed · Arizona · House Apr 14, 2026

HB 2918: renewable energy equipment; valuation; depreciation

HB 2918 changes how renewable energy and storage equipment is valued for property tax purposes in Arizona through 2040. It sets different valuation rules: non-utility-owned equipment is taxed at 100% of its depreciated cost, while utility-owned equipment is taxed at 20% of depreciated cost before January 1, 2027, and 100% after that date. The bill caps depreciation at 90% of the equipment's original cost and explicitly includes all energy storage (both co-located with solar/wind and standalone). This directly affects owners of renewable energy projects, including utilities and private developers, by altering their property tax burden based on ownership type and installation timeline.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesProvides tax incentive for renewable energy equipment via reduced property tax rates (20% for utilities pre-2027).90% confidence ✓ EnergySupports EnergyProvides tax incentives for renewable energy equipment by lowering valuation rates for utilities, promoting investment in clean energy infrastructure and storage systems.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentTax incentives for renewable energy equipment lower barriers to adoption, promoting clean energy infrastructure and aligning with environmental protection goals through financial support for renewables.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

Track

vetoed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2787: federal nullification; Mexican wolf; reintroduction

HB 2787 prohibits Arizona state agencies, employees, and political subdivisions from using state resources to enforce, administer, or cooperate with the federal Mexican wolf reintroduction program under the Endangered Species Act. It directly affects state government operations by banning state involvement in the wolf program, though it exempts the existing livestock loss program managed by the Livestock Loss Board. The bill does not change federal law but aims to limit state-level support for the program, which the legislature claims has exceeded population goals since 2014 and causes economic harm to ranchers. The bill focuses on state authority over resource use, not altering the federal program itself.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBlocks state support for federal Mexican wolf reintroduction under ESA, directly restricting endangered species conservation efforts and weakening environmental protection initiatives.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

signed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2278: financial assurance; reclamation; escrow; trusts

HB 2278 updates Arizona's requirements for mining companies to provide financial assurance to cover future land reclamation costs after operations end. It specifies that mining operators must use approved mechanisms like surety bonds, trust funds, or cash deposits held in third-party escrow accounts. The bill clarifies that mining companies retain all interest earned on cash deposits in escrow accounts (minus fees), and allows partial release of funds as reclamation work progresses. It also standardizes procedures for inspectors to release financial assurance once reclamation is completed, retaining 10% for monitoring and potential reseeding over a three-year period.

Topics ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentMandates financial assurance for mining reclamation, ensuring environmental restoration funds are available to protect natural resources after operations end.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

passed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2975: state lands; solar score; maps

HB 2975 prohibits Arizona's state land department from using solar scores or similar tools in land decisions starting from its effective date. The bill requires the department to develop two new resource scoring maps within two years: one for mining (considering known resources) and one for housing (considering development needs). These maps must be created with input from relevant industries and will guide the department’s land use planning and five-year disposal plans. The department must also submit updated maps to state leaders, including the governor and legislative leaders. This bill directly affects how Arizona manages state lands for mining, housing, and renewable energy projects.

Topics ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyProhibits use of solar scoring tools in land decisions, removing a mechanism to advance solar projects on state lands95% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill prohibits solar scores (promoting clean energy) in land decisions, replacing with mining/housing maps. Prioritizes industry development over environmental considerations, weakening clean energy promotion.85% confidence ✓ HousingSupports HousingMandates creation of housing development-focused map for land use planning, directly advancing housing development needs per bill's requirements.92% confidence ✗ TechnologyOpposes TechnologyProhibits use of solar scoring tools in land decisions, restricting tech application for renewable energy planning.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✗ Opposes Environment

Track

signed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2029: water conservation grant fund; disclosure

HB 2029 creates a Water Conservation Grant Fund to support water-saving projects in Arizona. It allows eligible entities (like local governments or nonprofits partnering with them) to apply for grants for conservation programs (up to $3 million) or projects (up to $250,000), requiring a 25% match from other sources. Applicants must disclose projected water savings, the source of saved water (groundwater or surface water), and their plan for using the saved water. The Water Infrastructure Finance Authority must adopt implementing rules within 90 days of the bill's effective date.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesCreates state-funded grant program for water conservation, allocating budget resources to support conservation initiatives.90% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentCreates grant fund for water conservation projects requiring disclosure of water savings and usage plans, directly advancing environmental conservation efforts.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment

signed · Arizona · House Apr 13, 2026

HB 2117: natural resource conservation board; fund

HB 2117 redirects $17 of the $25 annual fee for Arizona's environmental special license plates into a dedicated fund. The state natural resource conservation board will distribute $5,000 to $10,000 annually to each natural resource conservation district with an established education center. These funds must support environmental education programs that are scientifically based and address economic and social implications. The bill specifies that funds are exclusively for conservation education programs at local districts, without changing the plate fee structure.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesRedirects $17 of license plate fee into dedicated fund for conservation education programs, advancing fiscal allocation for environmental education within budget framework.95% confidence ✓ EducationSupports EducationRedirects $17 annual fee to fund environmental education programs at conservation districts with specific requirements for scientifically-based curriculum.85% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentRedirects $17 of license plate fees to conservation education fund, mandating scientifically based environmental programs addressing conservation. Explicitly funds conservation efforts.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Environment