Energy

vetoed · Arizona · House Jun 19, 2026

HB 2113: public service corporation; rates; intervenor

HB 2113 amends Arizona law to strengthen the role of the Director of Residential Utility Consumers. It requires the Director to intervene in public utility rate cases when proposed increases would raise residential customers' bills by 100% or more. The bill also mandates that the Director record all consumer contacts about service quality to identify broader issues, and refers consumers to the Corporation Commission for further assistance. These changes directly affect Arizona residential utility customers by giving the Director greater authority to challenge significant rate hikes.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill protects residential consumers from extreme utility rate hikes (100%+), aligning with consumer protection in energy policy.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

passed both · Arizona · House Apr 21, 2026

HCR 2057: supporting geothermal energy

HCR 2057 is a concurrent resolution supporting geothermal energy development in Arizona. It calls for state agencies (including the Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, Department of Environmental Quality, and others) to create a standardized permitting process for next-generation geothermal projects. The resolution does not create new laws but urges agencies to align existing rules to make permitting more predictable for developers. It directly affects geothermal energy companies and Arizona's regulatory agencies by promoting streamlined project approvals. The resolution passed the House and is now moving to the Senate.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill explicitly supports geothermal energy development by urging standardized permitting for renewable projects, advancing clean energy infrastructure and reducing developer barriers.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentPromotes geothermal energy development, a clean energy source, advancing environmental protection by facilitating renewable energy projects.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

passed · Arizona · House Apr 14, 2026

HB 2918: renewable energy equipment; valuation; depreciation

HB 2918 changes how renewable energy and storage equipment is valued for property tax purposes in Arizona through 2040. It sets different valuation rules: non-utility-owned equipment is taxed at 100% of its depreciated cost, while utility-owned equipment is taxed at 20% of depreciated cost before January 1, 2027, and 100% after that date. The bill caps depreciation at 90% of the equipment's original cost and explicitly includes all energy storage (both co-located with solar/wind and standalone). This directly affects owners of renewable energy projects, including utilities and private developers, by altering their property tax burden based on ownership type and installation timeline.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesProvides tax incentive for renewable energy equipment via reduced property tax rates (20% for utilities pre-2027).90% confidence ✓ EnergySupports EnergyProvides tax incentives for renewable energy equipment by lowering valuation rates for utilities, promoting investment in clean energy infrastructure and storage systems.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentTax incentives for renewable energy equipment lower barriers to adoption, promoting clean energy infrastructure and aligning with environmental protection goals through financial support for renewables.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

failed · Arizona · House Apr 8, 2026

HB 2795: small modular reactors; zoning; approval

HB 2795 modifies Arizona law to allow small modular reactor (SMR) construction and operation by preventing local governments from restricting these projects under specific conditions. It requires SMR developers to obtain federal early site permits and design certifications, then submit proof of these to the county board of supervisors before local zoning rules can be overridden. This directly affects SMR developers and Arizona counties, ensuring federal approvals supersede local zoning for eligible projects. The law does not alter federal requirements but clarifies that counties cannot block SMR sites once the federal steps are completed and documented.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill enables SMR construction by overriding local zoning restrictions, advancing nuclear energy infrastructure as a low-carbon energy solution.90% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentEnables SMR development, a low-carbon energy source, facilitating clean energy deployment per bill's zoning override for federal-approved projects.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

failed · Arizona · House Mar 24, 2026

HB 2781: decommissioning; solar energy; standards; fund

HB 2781 establishes rules for decommissioning solar energy power plants in Arizona, directly affecting solar plant owners and operators. It requires them to submit detailed decommissioning plans, maintain financial assurance (like bonds) covering cleanup costs, and restore sites to original conditions within 18 months after shutdown. Key provisions include a 90-day cure period for permit violations, mandatory site restoration using native vegetation, and specific removal requirements for above-ground components and foundations. Local governments (cities, towns, counties) enforce these standards and can enter sites to complete decommissioning if owners fail to act. The law ensures solar projects don’t leave environmental or financial burdens on communities after they’re no longer operational.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill mandates decommissioning standards for solar plants, requiring financial assurance and site restoration with native vegetation, ensuring responsible lifecycle management of renewable energy infrastructure.90% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentRequires solar plant decommissioning with native vegetation restoration and financial assurance, protecting land ecosystems and preventing post-operation environmental damage.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

failed · Arizona · House Mar 24, 2026

HB 2145: petition; waiver; fuel formulations

HB 2145 requires gasoline sold in Arizona counties with over 1.2 million residents (Area A) to meet either federal Phase II or California Phase 2 reformulated fuel standards, excluding minimum oxygen content rules. It allows fuel suppliers to petition for temporary waivers during imminent ethanol shortages, demonstrating supply issues and proposing alternative oxygenate blends that maintain approximately 3.5% oxygen content. The petition must specify affected suppliers, blend details, and a 60-day compliance period, with decisions made within 7 days by state officials. This bill directly affects gasoline suppliers and blenders in designated high-population areas, aiming to balance environmental standards with supply chain flexibility.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyRequires stricter reformulated fuel standards (Phase II/California Phase 2) in major counties, advancing cleaner energy production standards while maintaining oxygen content flexibility.85% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentRequires gasoline meeting stricter reformulated fuel standards (Phase II or CA Phase 2) to reduce emissions, aligning with environmental protection goals despite minor waiver provisions.90% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 23, 2026

HB 2384: school districts; lease agreements; requirements

HB 2384 modifies Arizona school district leasing rules by clarifying when voter approval is required for property leases. It states that school districts may lease property for up to 10 years without voter approval, but leases longer than 10 years must be approved by voters. The bill also lists specific exceptions where voter approval is not needed, such as for low-value properties ($50,000 or less), renewable energy contracts, or transactions using state school facilities funds. This directly affects school districts when leasing buildings, land, or other property for school operations. The changes aim to streamline leasing processes while maintaining accountability for longer-term agreements.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill explicitly lists renewable energy contracts as an exception requiring no voter approval, facilitating school district adoption of renewable energy agreements.85% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 10, 2026

HCM 2008: gas tax elimination

HCM 2008 is a memorial from Arizona's state legislature requesting the federal government eliminate the gas tax on Arizona's "Cleaner Burning Gas" blend during specific summer months. It targets the federal excise tax applied to this specialized fuel, which is more expensive to produce than standard gasoline but required to meet air quality standards in Maricopa and Pinal counties. The memorial asks Congress to either temporarily exempt this fuel from tax (May 1-Sept. 30) or grant the EPA emergency authority to waive the tax for EPA-approved blends meeting air quality standards. This request directly affects Arizona residents in those counties who use this fuel, aiming to lower local gas prices by removing the tax burden on the specialized blend.

Topics ✓ Budget & TaxesSupports Budget & TaxesBill explicitly requests federal elimination of gas tax on cleaner fuel, providing tax relief for producers meeting air quality standards.95% confidence ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill seeks tax exemption for cleaner-burning fuel blend meeting air quality standards, promoting its use as part of environmental energy policy.85% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentExempts cleaner-burning fuel from federal tax to promote air quality compliance, reducing emissions per its requirement for Maricopa/Pinal county standards.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

passed · Arizona · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 2330: line siting; factors; total environment

HB 2330 requires Arizona's committee to consider environmental and community factors when approving transmission line locations. It mandates evaluation of wildlife habitats, scenic areas, noise levels, public recreation access, and cost impacts on electricity customers. The bill specifically directs special attention to protecting rare species habitats and prohibits requiring construction labor agreements as a condition for project approval. It also allows the committee to override local land-use rules if deemed unreasonably restrictive, while still requiring compliance with pollution standards. This affects utility companies seeking transmission line permits and communities near proposed sites.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyMandates environmental review for transmission lines, protecting habitats and reducing barriers for renewable energy infrastructure development.85% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentMandates evaluation of wildlife habitats, rare species protection, and scenic areas; prohibits conditions weakening environmental review in transmission line approvals.95% confidence ✗ Labor & EmploymentOpposes Labor & EmploymentProhibits requiring construction labor agreements, directly limiting collective bargaining requirements and worker protections.95% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track

passed · Arizona · House Feb 26, 2026

HB 2452: comprehensive plans; data centers; nuclear

HB 2452 requires counties in Arizona with over 125,000 residents to include specific land use designations for data centers and small modular reactors in their comprehensive plans. The bill mandates counties to identify sufficient land locations and extents for data center construction and operation, and for larger counties (over 200,000 residents) to designate land for small modular reactors. It also adds provisions for energy planning, including incentives for renewable energy use and policies to support efficient energy consumption. This bill directly affects county planning processes by requiring new land-use considerations for data centers and nuclear energy infrastructure within existing planning frameworks.

Topics ✓ EnergySupports EnergyBill mandates land for data centers/SMRs and explicitly includes renewable energy incentives in energy planning provisions, advancing clean energy infrastructure development.95% confidence ✓ EnvironmentSupports EnvironmentBill mandates incentives for renewable energy use in energy planning, directly promoting clean energy adoption and environmental protection.90% confidence ✓ TechnologySupports TechnologyMandates land use planning for data centers, facilitating tech infrastructure development and aligning with renewable energy incentives for tech operations.92% confidence | Rep's Stance ✓ Voted Yes ✓ Supports Energy

Track