Issue · Housing

Housing

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in Wisconsin, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Rob Kreibich
100% support rate
Top opponent
Renuka Mayadev
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving housing in Wisconsin

Legislators moving housing in Wisconsin
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Rob Kreibich
Rob Kreibich House · District 28
R
Strong +
100% 38
Paul Tittl
Paul Tittl House · District 25
R
Strong +
100% 31
Dan Knodl
Dan Knodl House · District 24
R
Strong +
100% 38
Lindee Brill
Lindee Brill House · District 27
R
Strong +
100% 38
Jerry O'Connor
Jerry O'Connor House · District 60
R
Strong +
100% 38
Renuka Mayadev
Renuka Mayadev House · District 77
D
Strong −
0% 38
Kalan Haywood
Kalan Haywood House · District 16
D
Strong −
0% 34
Angela Stroud
Angela Stroud House · District 73
D
Strong −
0% 36
Ben DeSmidt
Ben DeSmidt House · District 65
D
Strong −
0% 38
Karen DeSanto
Karen DeSanto House · District 40
D
Strong −
0% 38
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All housing bills

passed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 812: Relating to: allowing more than 35 percent of the area within a tax incremental district in the Village of Somers to be used for residential use. (FE)

AB 812 amends a state statute to allow up to 50% of a tax incremental district's area in the Village of Somers to be used for residential development, increasing the previous limit from 35%. This change directly affects developers, planners, and property owners within Somers' designated tax increment districts by expanding permissible residential use. The bill modifies the statutory definition of "mixed-use development" to specify this higher residential percentage only for districts in Somers, while maintaining the 35% limit elsewhere in the state.
passed · Wisconsin · Assembly Mar 23, 2026

AB 451: Relating to: residential tax incremental districts. (FE)

AB 451 creates new rules for "residential tax incremental districts" (RTIDs) in cities, limiting these districts to 3% of a city's total taxable property value (down from a 12% cap for other districts). It requires RTIDs to fund only infrastructure for residential developments meeting strict size limits: single-family homes under 7,500 sq ft lots, two-family homes under 15,000 sq ft lots, and strict setbacks/sizes for homes (e.g., max 1,500 sq ft for single-story). Project costs are restricted to district-wide infrastructure (like stormwater systems), not individual lots, and must be paid from tax increments or developer financing. The bill directly affects cities creating RTIDs and developers building qualifying residential projects.