Home › Wisconsin › Elections 2022 › Mike Van Someren

Mike Van Someren

Democratic candidate · 2022 general election · Wisconsin

MV

Mike Van Someren

Democratic

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Dec 31, 2022. Covering the 2022 two-year cycle only.

The 2022 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$145,774
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$80,517
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$5,108
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$105,047
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$40,727
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $145,774 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2022 cycle
Source Amount Share of receipts
Individual contributions $80,517 55.2%
PAC and other committee contributions $5,108 3.5%
Party committee contributions $7,150 4.9%
Candidate self-funding $3,000 2.1%
Loans $50,000 34.3%
Other receipts, including transfers $0 0.0%
Total receipts $145,774 100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Dec 31, 2022 for the 2022 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2022 cycle
Measure Amount
Cash on hand at coverage end $40,727
Debts and obligations owed by the committee $50,000
Debts and obligations owed to the committee Not reported
Contributions refunded to individuals $0
Contributions refunded to committees $0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising. $0
Transfers made to other authorized committees $0
Repayments of candidate loans $0
Repayments of other loans $0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
Measure Amount How it was produced
Contributions net of refunds $95,774 Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsets Not reported An input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans $50,000 Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans $0 Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded $0 Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00790261, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 30G 2022 reported and what YE 2022 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 30G 2022 reported through Nov 28, 2022 and YE 2022 through Dec 31, 2022.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00790261
Measure 30G 2022Reported through Nov 28, 2022 YE 2022Reported through Dec 31, 2022 Change
Cash on hand at period end $63,036 $40,727 Down $22,309
Debts owed by the committee $50,000 $50,000 No change
Contribution refunds in the period $0 $0 No change

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $40,727 set beside the $22,309 this campaign spent during YE 2022, through Dec 31, 2022, which is 1.8 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Mike Van Someren. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

Spent opposing

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2022 cycle

What the money was spent on

These spending categories were produced by taxonomy spend-1.2 and the current rules are spend-1.3, so they are withheld until this record is refreshed.

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

All 6 shown $11,407 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
Rank Committee Amount Share Transactions Last activity
1 D.R.I.V.E. - DEMOCRAT, REPUBLICAN, INDEPENDENT VOTER EDUCATION (THE PAC OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS) C00032979 $5,000 43.8% 1 Sep 13, 2022
2 FIFTH CONG DIST DEM PARTY C00222422 $2,800 24.5% 1 Jul 12, 2022
3 DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF WISCONSIN FEDERAL C00019331 $2,000 17.5% 1 Oct 31, 2022
4 WISCONSIN MEDICAL SOCIETY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00548438 $1,000 8.8% 1 Oct 26, 2021
5 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00027342 $500 4.4% 1 Jul 12, 2022
6 WOMEN WIN WISCONSIN PAC C00776740 $107 0.9% 1 Aug 23, 2022

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2022 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Mike Van Someren

Committees itemized $11,407 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committee Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Labor union PACs $5,500 48.2% 2 2
Party committees $4,800 42.1% 2 2
Membership organization PACs $1,000 8.8% 1 1
Other candidates' committees $107 0.9% 1 1
Itemized total for this direction $11,407

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Mike Van Someren

Committees itemized $11,407 in contributions to this campaign. $4,907 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $6,500, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $6,500 and committees not yet categorized account for $0.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2022 cycle, ranked by amount
Interest Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Transportation unions Labor $5,000 76.9% 1 1
Physicians and medical specialties Health $1,000 15.4% 1 1
Building trades unions Labor $500 7.7% 1 1
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $4,907 Not applicable 3 3
Base the shares are taken over $6,500 100%
Itemized total for this direction $11,407

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

No Form 6 notices were found for the 2022 cycle. Notices are only required in the 20 days before an election, so none is the usual state outside that window.

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $46,605 of the $80,517 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 168 itemized contributions.

From Wisconsin

$38,050
81.6% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$8,555
18.4% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside Wisconsin is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2022 cycle
Kind of place Amount Contributions Share
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia. $46,605 168 100.0%

Places, largest first

  • Wisconsin this campaign's state $38,050
  • Michigan $2,800
  • Arizona $2,000
  • Illinois $1,300
  • Connecticut $880
  • Washington $750
  • Louisiana $500
  • Massachusetts $250
  • Georgia $50
  • California $25
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2022 cycle
Place Amount Contributions Share
Wisconsin this campaign's state $38,050 140 81.6%
Michigan $2,800 1 6.0%
Arizona $2,000 2 4.3%
Illinois $1,300 15 2.8%
Connecticut $880 2 1.9%
Washington $750 3 1.6%
Louisiana $500 1 1.1%
Massachusetts $250 1 0.5%
Georgia $50 2 0.1%
California $25 1 0.1%
Reported with a place $46,605 168 100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. House campaigns in Wisconsin, 2022 cycle: 23 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $145,774
  • Cohort median $145,774
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Wisconsin, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $145,774
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$11,439
Median$145,774
75th percentile$1,220,474
Highest in the cohort$6,479,115
Campaigns counted 23

11 of the 23 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 48th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 3.5%
  • Cohort median 6.2%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Wisconsin, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign 3.5%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median6.2%
75th percentile34.7%
Highest in the cohort70.9%
Campaigns counted 21

9 of the 21 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 43th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $40,727
  • Cohort median $23,921
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Wisconsin, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $40,727
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$2,078
Median$23,921
75th percentile$392,830
Highest in the cohort$2,996,003
Campaigns counted 23

14 of the 23 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 61th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Wisconsin, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$562,219
Campaigns counted 23

0 of the 23 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. House campaigns in Wisconsin, 2022 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$609,624
Campaigns counted 23

0 of the 23 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2022 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.