Issue · Environment

Environment (Wildlife)

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Washington, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
5
2025-2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Victoria Hunt
100% support rate
Top opponent
-
no data yet
Ranked legislators
5
5 support · 0 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving wildlife in Washington

Legislators moving wildlife in Washington
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Victoria Hunt
Victoria Hunt Senate · District 5
D
Strong +
100% 3
Adrian Cortes
Adrian Cortes Senate · District 18
D
Support
75% 4
Julio Cortes
Julio Cortes House · District 38
D
Support
75% 4
Javier Valdez
Javier Valdez Senate · District 46
D
Mixed
50% 4
Michelle Valdez
Michelle Valdez House · District 26
R
Mixed
50% 4
Showing 5 of 5 bills

All environment bills

in committee · Washington · Senate Feb 2, 2026

SB 6104: Protecting agriculture.

SB 6104 requires Washington state agencies (like DNR, Ecology, and Fish & Wildlife) to assess how their decisions affect agriculture before acting. It mandates "agricultural impact statements" for significant regulatory changes, evaluating economic effects, unavoidable harms, alternatives, and mitigation for farm land loss. The bill directly affects farmers, ranchers, and landowners by ensuring their economic viability is considered alongside environmental and regulatory goals. It also creates a fiscal review process to analyze regulatory cost impacts on agricultural entities before new laws or rules take effect.
Sub-Topics Wildlife Tags Agriculture
in committee · Washington · Senate Jan 12, 2026

SJM 8013: Requesting Congress to amend the marine mammal protection act and the migratory bird act to allow the lethal removal of pinnipeds and predatory birds in Puget Sound in a manner similar to the recent changes authorized in the Columbia river to protect endangered salmon populations.

This Washington State Senate Joint Memorial (SJM 8013) requests Congress to amend two federal laws - the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Act - to allow lethal removal of seals, sea lions, and predatory birds in Puget Sound. It directly affects endangered salmon populations by seeking to replicate a 2018 Columbia River policy that permits targeted removals to protect salmon. Key provisions include authorizing Washington State and tribal governments to remove these animals in salmon habitats, requiring the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration to process permits within six months, and eliminating lengthy environmental reviews. The request aims to address pinniped and bird predation on critically endangered salmon listed under the Endangered Species Act. This is a non-binding memorial seeking federal legislative action, not a passed law.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
in committee · Washington · Senate Jan 12, 2026

SB 5590: Protecting livestock from wolf predation.

SB 5590 creates a three-year pilot program allowing livestock owners, their immediate family, agents, or documented employees to take the first wolf returning to a site where livestock was previously preyed upon. Participants must monitor the site, report the wolf kill to the Department of Fish and Wildlife within 24 hours, and surrender the carcass. The program requires the Department to report on its effectiveness to the legislature by December 2028, and the law expires July 1, 2029. This directly affects Washington livestock producers facing wolf predation, modifying existing wildlife laws to exempt authorized wolf takings under this specific program from unlawful taking penalties.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
in committee · Washington · Senate Jan 12, 2026

SB 5354: Providing flexibility for the department of fish and wildlife to collaborate with local governments to manage gray wolves.

SB 5354 allows counties in Washington to stop treating gray wolves as state-endangered when specific population thresholds are met (15 statewide breeding pairs for 3 years and at least 3 breeding pairs locally). Once these criteria are satisfied, counties must notify the Department of Fish and Wildlife and enter into collaborative agreements with the department, tribes, and local stakeholders to co-manage wolves through regional plans. These plans must address livestock protection, minimize lethal wolf control, improve compensation for livestock losses, and maintain stable wolf populations. The bill directly affects rural counties, ranchers, tribes, and wildlife management, shifting wolf management from state-led to localized, cooperative efforts while preserving recovery goals.
Sub-Topics Wildlife
in committee · Washington · House Jan 12, 2026

HB 1442: Providing flexibility for the department of fish and wildlife to collaborate with local governments to manage gray wolves.

HB 1442 allows Washington counties with established gray wolf populations to collaborate with the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW) on localized wolf management, rather than maintaining state endangered species protections. It triggers this shift when the state meets a recovery goal of 15 statewide breeding pairs for three years *and* a specific county has at least three breeding pairs. Counties meeting these criteria must form interlocal agreements with DFW and tribes to develop regional plans within six months, requiring input from ranchers, conservation groups, and tribes. These plans must address minimizing livestock conflicts, improving response times for wolf-related issues, and maintaining stable wolf populations while protecting ranching interests. The bill directly affects rural counties, ranchers, tribes, and DFW, shifting management from state-level to collaborative, community-specific approaches.
Sub-Topics Conservation Wildlife