HB 276 creates Utah's "Digital Voyeurism Prevention Act" to address non-consensual AI-generated intimate images. It directly affects platforms and services that let users create such images (called "generation services"), requiring them to obtain and verify explicit consent from the person depicted before distributing any AI-generated intimate image. The bill mandates platforms to implement verification systems, disclose provenance data for AI content, and follow notice-and-takedown procedures for violations. It establishes civil liability for damages, including actual losses and attorney fees, enforced by Utah's Division of Consumer Protection.
HB 289 updates Utah's laws regarding child sexual abuse material to address AI-generated content. It defines "apparent child sexual abuse material" as AI-created images that realistically depict minors, creating new standalone offenses for possessing or distributing such material. The bill also defines "obscene child sexual abuse material" and amends existing definitions to exclude artificially generated content from the main "child sexual abuse material" category. These changes specifically target individuals who create, distribute, or possess AI-generated images that appear to show minors, while removing AI content from the primary legal definition. The bill amends multiple Utah code sections without appropriating funds.
HB 384 clarifies the structure and oversight responsibilities of Utah's Department of Government Operations. It explicitly places the Utah Office of Data Privacy within the department, updates the definition of "executive branch entity" to include the Division of Technology Services for payroll purposes, and shifts the Division of Finance's role from auditing all state claims to overseeing internal controls for financial transactions. The bill also clarifies the department's oversight of the state's accounting system and payroll services provided by the Division of Human Resource Management. These changes directly affect state agencies using payroll systems and the Division of Finance, streamlining administrative oversight without new funding.
HB 425 restricts how Utah cities and towns can charge certain fees. It bars cities from imposing general fees for broadband internet or public safety services (like police/fire) on the public, with limited exceptions (e.g., fees for bonds issued before 2026 must end by 2027). Similarly, towns cannot charge general fees for public safety services, except for existing fees tied to agreements between towns or volunteer services, which must be renewed every three years. The bill also creates a new process for municipalities to establish transportation utility fees (for services like roads), requiring annual reviews, appeal mechanisms, and local referendums for new fees.
SB 290 strengthens privacy protections for victims and witnesses in Utah criminal cases by regulating access to their nonpublic electronic data, such as personal messages or intimate images shared with law enforcement. It requires law enforcement to implement secure "virtual rooms" for defendants' attorneys to review sensitive data without copying it, creates a presumption against disclosing intimate images, and mandates clear disclosure of devices used in investigations. The bill directly affects victims/witnesses (who gain greater control over their private information), law enforcement (who must adopt new policies), and defendants (who must seek court approval to access nonpublic data). Key provisions include defining "nonpublic victim or witness data," requiring prosecutors to notify defendants about device searches, and limiting data sharing to specific court-approved scenarios. The bill makes no changes to existing evidence disclosure rules under Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure.
SB 310 proposes changes to laws regarding intimate image disclosure by limiting when people can be held liable for sharing or threatening to share such images. It creates two key exceptions: disclosure isn't liable if it's already illegal under other laws, or if done for sexual arousal, humiliation, degradation, or financial gain. The bill also clarifies that disclosing intimate images of public figures doesn't automatically become a "matter of public interest." This bill is currently pending in the House Judiciary Committee and would directly affect individuals who share intimate images, particularly concerning children and public figures.
SB 292 amends Utah's product liability laws specifically for automated driving systems (ADS), directly affecting manufacturers and developers of level 3-5 autonomous vehicles. It limits noneconomic damages in related lawsuits, creates a legal defense for companies meeting "state-of-the-art" technology standards, and restricts liability to certain claims. The bill also establishes new definitions for ADS levels and requires a sunset review of these liability provisions. These changes aim to clarify legal responsibilities as autonomous vehicle technology advances, without altering federal safety standards.
HB 474 updates Utah's Uniform Commercial Code to modernize rules for digital transactions. It replaces "writing" with "record" to include electronic documents and creates new rules for controlling digital assets like bank accounts, electronic titles, and payment intangibles. The bill clarifies when a secured party (e.g., a bank or lender) has control over electronic records, affecting how security interests attach and are enforced in digital transactions. Businesses, financial institutions, and individuals using electronic contracts or digital assets in Utah will directly experience these changes, as the bill aligns Utah's commercial law with current electronic commerce practices.
HB 181 enacts Utah's adoption of the Uniform Electronic Estate Planning Documents Act. It allows electronic versions of non-will estate planning documents (like powers of attorney, living wills, and trust documents) to have the same legal standing as paper copies. The bill requires electronic signatures to be attributable to the person signing and sets standards for notarization, witnessing, and document retention. It ensures these electronic documents cannot be rejected in court solely because they are digital. This directly affects individuals creating estate plans and legal professionals handling such documents.
SB 162 adds a sales tax to online digital content, including subscription-based streaming services like Netflix or Spotify. It affects companies providing digital video/audio services and their customers who purchase these subscriptions. The bill clarifies that transactions already subject to a multi-channel video service tax remain exempt from this new tax. These changes update Utah's sales tax rules for digital services without requiring new state spending.