Issue · Healthcare

Healthcare

Every healthcare bill, vote, and legislator stance in Utah, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 General Session
Top supporter
Kathleen Riebe
87% support rate
Top opponent
Lincoln Fillmore
10% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving healthcare in Utah

Legislators moving healthcare in Utah
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Kathleen Riebe
Kathleen Riebe Senate · District 15
D
Strong +
87% 23
Nate Blouin
Nate Blouin Senate · District 13
D
Strong +
83% 24
Karen Kwan
Karen Kwan Senate · District 12
D
Strong +
83% 23
Emily Buss
Emily Buss Senate · District 11
N
Strong +
82% 22
Norm Thurston
Norm Thurston House · District 62
R
Strong +
80% 20
Lincoln Fillmore
Lincoln Fillmore Senate · District 17
R
Strong −
10% 20
John Johnson
John Johnson Senate · District 3
R
Oppose
30% 23
Cal Musselman
Cal Musselman Senate · District 4
R
Oppose
38% 21
Dan McCay
Dan McCay Senate · District 18
R
Oppose
38% 21
Tiara Auxier
Tiara Auxier House · District 4
R
Oppose
38% 21
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All healthcare bills

signed · Utah · Senate Mar 25, 2026

SB 174: Exercise of Religious Beliefs and Conscience Amendments

SB 174 allows health care providers, institutions, and payers in Utah to refuse participation in certain medical services (like pregnancy termination disposal) based on religious, moral, or ethical beliefs. It requires providers who refuse such services to notify their institution and prohibits retaliation, discrimination, or adverse actions against them for exercising this right. The bill also shields these individuals from civil, criminal, or administrative liability and mandates health care payers to disclose services they won’t cover due to conscience objections. It defines key terms like "conscience" and "adverse action" to clarify protections and enforcement mechanisms. The bill makes no changes to funding and applies to all covered health care entities under Utah law.
signed · Utah · House Mar 19, 2026

HB 527: Pharmacy Pricing Amendments

HB 527 amends Utah's pharmacy pricing rules to require pharmacy benefit managers to base reimbursement rates only on drugs rated "A" or "B" in the FDA's Orange Book (or similar ratings) that are not obsolete and generally available in the state. It clarifies key terms like "maximum allowable cost" and "rebate," and grants the Insurance Department authority to create implementing rules. This directly affects pharmacies, pharmacy benefit managers, and insurers by changing how drug reimbursement rates are calculated. The bill does not appropriate funds or create new taxes.
signed · Utah · House Mar 18, 2026

HB 174: Sex Characteristic Change Treatment Amendments

HB 174 prohibits health care providers in Utah from administering cross-sex hormones or puberty blockers to minors after January 28, 2027, unless the minor was diagnosed with gender dysphoria before January 28, 2023. The bill amends Utah Code Section 58-1-603.1 to establish this ban, directly affecting minors seeking these treatments who do not meet the pre-2023 diagnosis requirement. It repeals a prior requirement for medical evidence reviews (Section 26B-1-239) and takes effect on May 6, 2026. The law applies to all minors under Utah's definition, with violations classified as unprofessional conduct for providers.
passed · Utah · Senate Mar 7, 2026

SB 24: Health Care Providers Immunity Amendments

SB 24 repeals multiple healthcare-related laws and licensing acts in Utah by setting specific effective dates for their termination. Key provisions include repealing the Health Care Providers Immunity from Liability Act (effective July 1, 2036), massage therapy licensing laws (2029-2034), behavioral health treatment regulations (2027), and opioid supply restrictions (2032), among others. These changes directly affect healthcare providers, clinics, and licensed professionals operating under the repealed statutes. The bill takes effect May 6, 2026, with all repealed provisions ceasing to apply on their respective dates. No new funding is appropriated, and the changes eliminate existing legal protections or requirements for covered healthcare services.