Issue · Transportation

Transportation

Every transportation bill, vote, and legislator stance in United States, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
119th Congress
Top supporter
Matt Van Epps
86% support rate
Top opponent
Adelita S. Grijalva
14% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving transportation in United States

Legislators moving transportation in United States
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Matt Van Epps
Matt Van Epps House · District 7
R
Strong +
86% 67
Martin Heinrich
Martin Heinrich Senate
D
Support
78% 133
John Fetterman
John Fetterman Senate
D
Support
70% 150
Nikema Williams
Nikema Williams House · District 5
D
Support
70% 113
Greg Casar
Greg Casar House · District 35
D
Support
70% 105
Adelita S. Grijalva
Adelita S. Grijalva House · District 7
D
Strong −
14% 72
James R. Walkinshaw
James R. Walkinshaw House · District 11
D
Strong −
14% 80
Josh Gottheimer
Josh Gottheimer House · District 5
D
Strong −
14% 109
Marsha Blackburn
Marsha Blackburn Senate
R
Oppose
22% 128
Donald Norcross
Donald Norcross House · District 1
D
Oppose
25% 107
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All transportation bills

passed · United States · House Sep 1, 2026

HRES 1499: Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1501) to amend the FAST Act to include certain mineral production activities as a covered project, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 9436) to amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 to extend the time period for which certain regulations concerning the North Atlantic right whale are effective; providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 1490) providing for the condemnation and denouncement of socialism in all its forms, and for other purposes; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4795) to amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to prohibit an institution that participates in a nonexpressive commercial boycott of Israel from being eligible for certain funds under that Act, to require an institution that participates in certain programs under that Act to certify that students are not unreasonably obstructed from participating in academic programs in Israel, and for other purposes; and relating to consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

H.Res. 1499 is a procedural resolution that establishes specific rules for the House of Representatives to consider four separate legislative measures and a constitutional amendment proposal. It allows for the consideration of H.R. 1501, which would amend the FAST Act to classify certain mineral production activities as covered infrastructure projects, and H.R. 9436, which extends the effective period of regulations concerning North Atlantic right whales. The resolution also provides the framework for debating H.Res. 1490, a measure condemning socialism, and H.R. 4795, which would restrict federal funding for higher education institutions that participate in commercial boycotts of Israel or obstruct student participation in academic programs there. Additionally, it extends debate time to one hour for a joint resolution proposing a constitutional amendment to fix the size of the Supreme Court at nine justices.
passed · United States · House Dec 18, 2025

HR 4776: SPEED Act

The SPEED Act reforms the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to streamline federal environmental reviews for projects. It limits agencies to considering only "proximate" environmental effects directly tied to a specific project (not speculative or distant impacts), sets strict 180-day deadlines for court remands, and restricts judicial review to procedural errors - not environmental outcomes. This primarily affects federal agencies (like the EPA or Corps of Engineers) and project developers (e.g., for infrastructure, energy, or construction projects) by reducing review scope and accelerating approvals. The bill clarifies NEPA is purely procedural, prohibiting courts from substituting their judgment on environmental effects or delaying actions for new scientific data after deadlines.
signed · United States · House Jun 12, 2025

HJRES 88: Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

H.J.Res. 88 disapproves an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that would have allowed California to enforce its "Advanced Clean Cars II" vehicle emission standards. This rule, submitted by the EPA on January 6, 2025, sought to grant California a waiver to override federal preemption for its stricter vehicle pollution controls. The resolution, passed by Congress and signed into law on June 12, 2025, formally nullifies the EPA rule, preventing California from implementing its Advanced Clean Cars II program under this specific waiver. The bill directly affects California's ability to set its own vehicle emission standards for passenger cars and light trucks.
signed · United States · House May 23, 2025

HJRES 60: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles".

This joint resolution allows off-road vehicles to be used in certain areas of the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, which is in northern Arizona and southeastern Utah and contains Lake Powell. Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the rule issued by the National Park Service (NPS) titled Glen Canyon National Recreation Area; Motor Vehicles  and published on January 13, 2025. Under the rule, the NPS limited the use of off-road vehicles, such as off-highway vehicles and all-terrain vehicles, in certain areas. For instance, the rule prohibited the use of off-road vehicles on an 8-mile segment of the Poison Spring Loop located on Route 633 proceeding north to Route 730 in the Orange Cliffs Special Management Unit. The rule also eliminated the authority of the NPS to open the upper portion of the Flint Trail in that unit to off-road vehicles. Additionally, the rule limited off-road vehicle use from certain roads to the shoreline of the lake.