Issue · Labor & Employment

Labor & Employment

Every labor & employment bill, vote, and legislator stance in United States, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
3
119th Congress
Top supporter
Brian K. Fitzpatrick
93% support rate
Top opponent
Bernard Sanders
23% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving labor & employment in United States

Legislators moving labor & employment in United States
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Brian K. Fitzpatrick
Brian K. Fitzpatrick House · District 1
R
Strong +
93% 14
Christopher H. Smith
Christopher H. Smith House · District 4
R
Strong +
93% 14
Jefferson Van Drew
Jefferson Van Drew House · District 2
R
Strong +
93% 14
Nick LaLota
Nick LaLota House · District 1
R
Strong +
93% 14
Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr.
Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr. House · District 8
R
Strong +
93% 14
Bernard Sanders
Bernard Sanders Senate
I
Oppose
23% 13
Edward J. Markey
Edward J. Markey Senate
D
Oppose
23% 13
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren Senate
D
Oppose
23% 13
Lisa Blunt Rochester
Lisa Blunt Rochester Senate
D
Oppose
23% 13
Rand Paul
Rand Paul Senate
R
Oppose
25% 12
Showing 3 of 3 bills

All labor & employment bills

signed · United States · House Sep 18, 2026

HR 5334: Lindsey O. Graham Sanctioning Russia and Iran Act of 2026

HR 5334, the SEED Act of 2025, expands the existing educator expense deduction under federal tax law to explicitly include early childhood educators. It revises the Internal Revenue Code to cover expenses for "early childhood educators" and broadens the educational levels affected to include "pre-kindergarten through grade 12." This change allows early childhood educators (such as preschool teachers) to deduct work-related expenses like classroom supplies and professional development costs, which they previously could not claim under the existing deduction for "kindergarten through grade 12" teachers. The amendment applies to expenses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.
in committee · United States · Senate May 13, 2026

SJRES 132: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Examinations for Risks to Active-Duty Servicemembers and Their Covered Dependents".

This joint resolution seeks to disapprove a rule from the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection that would have removed protections for active-duty military service members and their dependents. The bill directly affects the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and military personnel by preventing the withdrawal of regulations that require financial institutions to examine risks to servicemembers. If passed, the resolution would keep existing rules in place that mandate banks and lenders assess how their products impact active-duty military families. The measure uses a congressional veto process to block the agency's attempt to eliminate these examination requirements.
in committee · United States · Senate Apr 29, 2026

SJRES 99: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services relating to "Removal of the Automatic Extension of Employment Authorization Documents".

This joint resolution (SJRES 99) seeks congressional disapproval of a specific U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) rule that removed automatic extensions for Employment Authorization Documents (EADs). The rule, published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2025, ended the prior practice of automatically extending work permits for certain immigrants while their renewal applications were pending. If approved, this resolution would block the rule from taking effect, restoring the automatic extension process for EAD holders. The policy change directly affects non-citizens in the U.S. who hold EADs and are waiting for renewal processing, preventing potential gaps in work authorization.