Environment (Wildlife)

in committee · United States · House Aug 26, 2026

HR 6788: Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act

HR 6788, the Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act, removes wilderness study area designations for three specific Montana lands: the 81,000-acre Middle Fork Judith area (managed by the Forest Service) and the 11,380-acre Hoodoo Mountain and 11,580-acre Wales Creek areas (managed by the Bureau of Land Management). These areas were previously evaluated and determined unsuitable for wilderness designation under federal law, with land agencies confirming this through collaborative reviews in 2021 and 2020. The bill directs land managers to instead follow existing land and resource management plans for these areas, which were developed through multi-year stakeholder processes. This change aims to improve management by enhancing sportsmen access, public recreation, and wildlife habitat projects while maintaining current protections under environmental laws.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRemoves wilderness study area designations, weakening conservation protections for Montana lands previously designated for protection.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Conservation Public Lands Wildlife

Track

in committee · United States · House Jul 23, 2025

HJRES 111: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Barred Owl Management Strategy".

HJRES 111 is a joint resolution seeking congressional disapproval of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule on barred owl management. The rule, published in September 2024, outlined strategies to reduce barred owl populations to protect the endangered spotted owl. Under the Congressional Review Act, this resolution would nullify the rule, preventing its implementation. If enacted, the rule would have no legal effect, and the agency could not enforce the barred owl management strategy.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill seeks disapproval of rule protecting endangered spotted owl via barred owl management, weakening conservation efforts to prevent implementation of species protection strategy.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Wildlife

Track

in committee · United States · House Jan 3, 2025

HR 65: Armed Forces Endangered Species Exemption Act

This bill exempts military operations from key provisions of the Endangered Species Act. It prohibits designating military installations or lands used for defense purposes (like training or weapons testing) as "critical habitat" for endangered species and removes the requirement for the military to consult with wildlife agencies before such activities. Military personnel can now take, harm, or cause mortality to protected species during defense-related operations - including training, weapons testing, or other activities deemed necessary by the Secretary of Defense - without violating the law. These changes directly affect how the Department of Defense manages land use and species protection across all military bases and defense-related activities.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentExempts military from Endangered Species Act requirements, removing habitat protections and consultation mandates, weakening conservation efforts.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Conservation Wildlife

Track

in committee · United States · Senate Apr 4, 2025

S 1306: A bill to require the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a final rule removing the gray wolf from the list of endangered and threatened wildlife under the Endangered Species Act of 1973.

S 1306 requires the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to reissue a 2020 rule that removed gray wolves from the federal endangered species list. This would directly affect gray wolf populations and their management, as it would restore the wolves' status as non-endangered under the Endangered Species Act. The bill mandates the reissuance within 60 days of enactment and explicitly prohibits any court challenges to this action. This is a procedural bill focused on reversing a prior regulatory decision without allowing judicial review.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill removes gray wolves from ESA protections, weakening federal conservation efforts by reversing endangered status and prohibiting legal challenges to this deregulation.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Wildlife

Track

in committee · United States · Senate Mar 4, 2026

S 3527: Montana Sportsmen Conservation Act

This bill removes wilderness study area designations from three specific Montana public lands: the 81,000-acre Middle Fork Judith area (managed by the Forest Service), and the 11,380-acre Hoodoo Mountain and 11,580-acre Wales Creek areas (managed by the Bureau of Land Management). These lands were previously evaluated and determined unsuitable for wilderness designation under federal law. The bill directs land managers to instead implement existing management plans developed through collaborative processes, which allow for activities like improved public access, wildlife habitat projects, and sportsmen opportunities. This change affects over 104,000 acres of public land in Montana that had remained under wilderness study status despite being deemed unsuitable for wilderness management.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentRemoves wilderness study area designations, reducing conservation safeguards for public lands previously evaluated as unsuitable for wilderness status.85% confidence

Sub-Topics Conservation Public Lands Wildlife

Track

in committee · United States · Senate Oct 29, 2025

SJRES 69: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Record of Decision for the Barred Owl Management Strategy; Washington, Oregon, and California".

Senate Joint Resolution 69 (SJRES 69) seeks to disapprove a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule titled "Record of Decision for the Barred Owl Management Strategy" in Washington, Oregon, and California. The rule, issued in September 2024, outlines a plan to manage barred owl populations to protect endangered spotted owls by controlling their numbers in the region. Under the Congressional Review Act, this resolution would block the rule from taking effect, voiding its implementation. This directly affects the federal agency's ability to carry out the barred owl management strategy in the three states.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill seeks to disapprove a rule managing barred owls to protect endangered spotted owls, weakening conservation efforts under the Congressional Review Act.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Wildlife

Track

passed · United States · House Sep 16, 2025

HRES 354: Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 60) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the National Park Service relating to "Glen Canyon National Recreation Area: Motor Vehicles"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 78) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Distinct Population Segment of the Longfin Smelt"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 87) providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Heavy-Duty Vehicle and Engine Emission Warranty and Maintenance Provisions; Advanced Clean Trucks; Zero Emission Airport Shuttle; Zero-Emission Power Train Certification; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 88) providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine Pollution Control Standards; Advanced Clean Cars II; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision"; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 89) providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The "Omnibus" Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision"; and for other purposes.

HRES 354 is a procedural resolution that sets rules for the House to vote on five separate disapproval resolutions (H.J. Res. 60, 78, 87-89). These disapproval resolutions aim to block specific federal agency rules: one from the National Park Service regarding motor vehicles in Glen Canyon, another from Fish & Wildlife on endangered smelt protections, and three from the EPA targeting California's vehicle emissions standards. The resolution streamlines debate and voting on these disapproval measures, waiving most procedural objections to allow direct consideration. If passed, the disapproval resolutions would cancel the agency rules, directly affecting how California implements vehicle pollution controls and wildlife protections. The bill itself does not change policy but enables Congress to block these specific regulations.

Topics ✗ EnergyOpposes EnergyBill aims to disapprove EPA rules enforcing California's Advanced Clean Cars II emissions standards, opposing stricter clean energy vehicle regulations.90% confidence ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentEnables disapproval of EPA and Fish & Wildlife rules strengthening vehicle emissions standards and endangered species protections, weakening environmental regulations.90% confidence ✗ TransportationOpposes TransportationFacilitates disapproval of EPA vehicle emission rules (Advanced Clean Trucks, Advanced Clean Cars II), weakening transportation regulations on vehicle standards.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Parks & Recreation Wildlife Airports Vehicle Registration

Track

passed · United States · House May 5, 2025

HJRES 78: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service relating to "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Endangered Species Status for the San Francisco Bay-Delta Distinct Population Segment of the Longfin Smelt".

HJRES 78 is a joint resolution seeking congressional disapproval of a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule that granted endangered species status to the San Francisco Bay-Delta population of the longfin smelt, a fish native to California's Bay-Delta region. If passed, this resolution would block the rule from taking effect, preventing the smelt from receiving federal protections under the Endangered Species Act. The rule, published in the Federal Register in July 2024, aimed to protect this specific fish population from threats like habitat loss and water management practices. This resolution does not create new policy but directly reverses an existing regulatory action affecting the smelt and its ecosystem.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill seeks to block federal protections for endangered longfin smelt under ESA, directly weakening environmental regulations for species conservation.95% confidence

Sub-Topics Wildlife

Track

in committee · United States · House Jan 3, 2025

HR 102: American Sovereignty and Species Protection Act of 2025

This bill amends the Endangered Species Act to prevent federal protection for nonnative species and restrict conservation funding. Specifically, it blocks the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service from listing nonnative species as endangered or threatened under Section 4(a), and prohibits using federal funds to acquire land in foreign countries for conservation under Section 8(a). It directly affects the administration of the Endangered Species Act and conservation organizations working with nonnative species or international land acquisitions. The key changes are a categorical exclusion of nonnative species from protection and a ban on foreign land purchases using federal conservation funds.

Topics ✗ EnvironmentOpposes EnvironmentBill blocks federal protection for nonnative species under ESA and prohibits conservation funding for foreign land acquisition, weakening environmental protections and defunding conservation efforts.90% confidence

Sub-Topics Conservation Wildlife

Track