HJRES 57 is a congressional resolution seeking to reject a specific rule issued by the Department of the Interior. It targets the rule titled "Oil and Gas and Sulfur Operations in the Outer Continental Shelf-High Pressure High Temperature Updates" (published in the Federal Register on August 30, 2024). If approved, this resolution would formally disapprove the rule under Chapter 8 of Title 5, U.S. Code, meaning the rule would have no legal effect. This action directly affects the regulatory framework governing oil and gas operations in high-pressure, high-temperature areas on the Outer Continental Shelf. The resolution is procedural and does not create new policy, but rather seeks to nullify an existing regulation.
This resolution blocks a Department of Energy rule that would have set new energy efficiency standards for gas-fired instant water heaters. It prevents the rule from taking effect, meaning appliance manufacturers would not have to meet the proposed efficiency requirements. The rule, submitted in December 2024, directly affected manufacturers of these water heaters and consumers purchasing them. Congress approved this disapproval through a joint resolution passed on May 9, 2025.
HJRES 35 is a congressional resolution disapproving an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that established procedures for emissions charges on petroleum and natural gas systems. Specifically, it targets the EPA’s November 2024 rule titled "Waste Emissions Charge for Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems: Procedures for Facilitating Compliance, Including Netting and Exemptions," which would have required companies to pay fees based on emissions. The resolution, passed by both chambers in February 2025, nullifies the rule, preventing it from taking effect. This directly affects oil and gas companies subject to the EPA’s emissions regulations, removing a specific compliance mechanism they would have faced.
This bill amends the federal tax credit for carbon capture (Section 45Q) to expand eligibility for companies capturing carbon dioxide. It adds new qualifying uses for the credit, including using captured carbon as a "tertiary injectant" in oil/gas extraction projects and certain other storage methods. The credit amount is set at $17 per metric ton for 2025-2026, then adjusted annually for inflation after 2026. The changes apply to tax years beginning after December 31, 2024, directly affecting businesses engaged in carbon capture and storage.
This bill amends the Natural Gas Act to give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) exclusive authority to approve U.S. LNG export terminal projects, requiring FERC to deem such exports consistent with the public interest. It directly affects natural gas companies seeking to build or expand export facilities and streamlines FERC's review process by removing prior requirements for interagency coordination. The bill clarifies that FERC's decisions won't override existing sanctions laws, including restrictions on trade with countries designated as state sponsors of terrorism under current law. This change aims to accelerate domestic LNG export projects while maintaining legal safeguards for national security and foreign policy.
HR 2820, the California Clean Coast Act of 2025, prohibits new oil and gas leasing and related activities in federal waters off California's coast starting from its enactment date. This directly affects oil and gas companies seeking to develop new offshore resources in California’s outer Continental Shelf areas. The bill preserves existing leases issued before the law’s effective date but bans all future preleasing, leasing, and related activities in those waters. It represents a permanent federal policy change for California’s coastal offshore regions, with no impact on current leaseholders.
S 3839 would block state laws requiring specific renewable energy targets (like renewable portfolio standards) or tying utility market participation to such requirements. It directly affects state governments, local regulators, and utilities by preempting these mandates as "inconsistent" with federal grid reliability goals. The bill's key mechanism is federal preemption, voiding any state law that mandates renewable energy percentages or conditions utility operations on compliance with such rules. It does not prevent states from owning or operating renewable energy facilities themselves, but would override state climate policies that impact grid planning or cost structures.
The GRID Act repeals federal requirements that would have mandated electric utilities to implement EV charging programs. It removes specific provisions from the 1978 Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act related to electric vehicle infrastructure, including standards for utility EV charging mandates. This directly affects electric utilities by eliminating federal directives about EV charging and ratepayers who might have faced potential cost increases from such requirements. The bill effectively prevents federal imposition of EV charging mandates on utilities.
This bill automatically approves U.S. natural gas export applications to NATO member countries and Ukraine for three years after enactment, removing delays or modifications. It directly affects U.S. LNG exporters (who gain faster approvals) and NATO/Ukraine (who secure guaranteed supply). The key provision streamlines export authorization under the Natural Gas Act for these specific partners during the 3-year period. The bill aims to strengthen energy security ties by prioritizing U.S. gas over alternatives from adversaries, citing Ukraine's energy needs during Russia's invasion.
This bill amends the Natural Gas Act to give the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) exclusive authority to approve or deny applications for LNG terminals (including those for export or import). It requires FERC to deem such projects "consistent with the public interest" when making decisions. The bill also clarifies that the President retains existing authority under laws like the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to block LNG exports to countries designated as "state sponsors of terrorism." This directly affects LNG terminal developers and FERC, streamlining approval processes while preserving presidential sanctions powers.
