Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in Tennessee, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
13
114th Regular Session (2025-2026)
Top supporter
Jeff Yarbro
100% support rate
Top opponent
Steve Southerland
0% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in Tennessee

Legislators moving environment in Tennessee
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Jeff Yarbro
Jeff Yarbro Senate · District 21
D
Strong +
100% 9
London Lamar
London Lamar Senate · District 33
D
Strong +
92% 12
Charlane Oliver
Charlane Oliver Senate · District 19
D
Strong +
89% 18
Sara Kyle
Sara Kyle Senate · District 30
D
Strong +
89% 9
Heidi Campbell
Heidi Campbell Senate · District 20
D
Strong +
83% 18
Steve Southerland
Steve Southerland Senate · District 9
R
Strong −
0% 11
Mark Pody
Mark Pody Senate · District 17
R
Strong −
6% 16
Paul Rose
Paul Rose Senate · District 32
R
Strong −
7% 15
Dawn White
Dawn White Senate · District 13
R
Strong −
8% 13
Todd Gardenhire
Todd Gardenhire Senate · District 10
R
Strong −
8% 13
Showing 11–13 of 13 bills

All environment bills

passed both · Tennessee · Senate Apr 7, 2025

SB 527: Pest Control - As introduced, specifies that a manufacturer or seller of a pesticide registered with the commissioner of agriculture and with the environmental protection agency under the federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) is not liable in a civil action related to the labeling of the pesticide, if the pesticide bore a label approved by the EPA under FIFRA at the time of sale. - Amends TCA Title 43, Chapter 8.

SB 527 exempts pesticide manufacturers and sellers from civil lawsuits related to labeling, provided the pesticide was registered with both Tennessee's commissioner of agriculture and the EPA under federal law (FIFRA) and bore an EPA-approved label at the time of sale. The bill specifically removes liability for product safety claims tied to labeling, as long as the pesticide met all federal and state registration requirements. It does not apply if the pesticide was manufactured or sold in violation of Tennessee law or FIFRA. This change directly affects pesticide companies and could influence how product liability cases are handled in Tennessee courts.
in committee · Tennessee · Senate Feb 12, 2025

SB 702: Environmental Preservation - As introduced, enacts the "Climate Resiliency Fund Act." - Amends TCA Title 4, Chapter 3, Part 5; Title 9; Title 60; Title 67 and Title 68.

SB 702 creates the "Climate Resiliency Fund" to finance projects addressing climate change impacts in Tennessee. It requires fossil fuel businesses (coal, oil, gas) operating between 1995 and 2025 to pay cost recovery fees based on their greenhouse gas emissions into the fund. The fund will support climate adaptation projects like flood protections, infrastructure upgrades, and healthcare programs, with priority given to communities designated as "environmental justice focus populations" (low-income, high-minority, or limited English proficiency areas). The bill defines specific eligible projects, including nature-based solutions, stormwater system improvements, and resilience planning for vulnerable infrastructure.
died · Tennessee · Senate Feb 10, 2025

SB 665: Environment and Conservation, Department of - As introduced, requires the department to submit an annual report regarding the number of applications filed pursuant to the Water Quality Control Act; requires the department to include information on the mechanism of compensatory mitigation provided for in permits that are required to have a provision for adequate compensatory mitigation; requires additional information when the mechanism of compensatory mitigation is an in-lieu fee program or mitigation banking. - Amends TCA Title 69.

SB 665 requires Tennessee's Department of Environment and Conservation to submit annual reports starting July 2025 on water quality permit applications and the compensatory mitigation methods used in those permits. The report must track the number of permit applications and detail how developers offset environmental impacts - such as through wetland restoration projects, in-lieu fee programs, or mitigation banking - including specific financial details like fees collected or credits sold. This affects the department (which must prepare the reports), permit applicants (whose mitigation methods are tracked), and state officials (who receive the reports). The bill aims to increase transparency around how environmental damage from development is compensated, without changing existing permit requirements.
Showing 11 to 13 of 13 bills