Issue · Technology

Technology

Every technology bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
12
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Spencer Gosch
93% support rate
Top opponent
Erik Muckey
25% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving technology in South Dakota

Legislators moving technology in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Spencer Gosch
Spencer Gosch House · District 23
R
Strong +
93% 15
Liz May
Liz May House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 11
Paul Miskimins
Paul Miskimins Senate · District 20
R
Strong +
86% 7
Stephanie Sauder
Stephanie Sauder Senate · District 4
R
Strong +
86% 7
Heather Baxter
Heather Baxter House · District 34
R
Support
78% 9
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Oppose
25% 8
Kevin Van Diepen
Kevin Van Diepen House · District 22
R
Oppose
25% 8
Kadyn Wittman
Kadyn Wittman House · District 15
D
Oppose
30% 10
Amber Arlint
Amber Arlint House · District 12
R
Oppose
33% 9
Chris Kassin
Chris Kassin House · District 17
R
Oppose
33% 9
Showing 11–12 of 12 bills

All technology bills

passed both · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HB 1275: create requirements for age verification and parental consent for application stores and to provide a penalty therefor.

This bill amends existing state consumer protection laws to add requirements for age verification and parental consent for application stores, which are digital platforms where users download software applications. The legislation would require these stores to verify the age of users and obtain parental consent from minors before allowing them to access or download applications. It also establishes penalties for businesses that fail to comply with these new verification and consent requirements. The bill does not create new consumer protection categories but rather modifies existing deceptive trade practices provisions to include digital application store compliance.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 23, 2026

HB 1305: prohibit the dissemination of location information about a public officer and provide a penalty and civil cause of action therefor.

HB 1305 prohibits sharing the home, work, or school location of a public officer (current or former) or their family without consent, specifically when intended to harass, threaten, or cause fear for safety. It makes violations a Class 6 felony and creates a civil lawsuit option for affected officers to recover damages (including emotional distress), attorney fees, and punitive damages. The law directly affects public officers and their households by restricting location information dissemination under these conditions. It applies regardless of whether criminal charges are filed for the same act.
Showing 11 to 12 of 12 bills