Issue · Housing

Housing

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Terri Jorgenson
100% support rate
Top opponent
Scott Odenbach
11% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving housing in South Dakota

Legislators moving housing in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Terri Jorgenson
Terri Jorgenson House · District 29
R
Strong +
100% 41
Mike Weisgram
Mike Weisgram House · District 24
R
Strong +
88% 58
Al Novstrup
Al Novstrup House · District 3
R
Strong +
88% 41
William Shorma
William Shorma House · District 17
R
Strong +
86% 36
Jim Mehlhaff
Jim Mehlhaff Senate · District 24
R
Strong +
83% 58
Scott Odenbach
Scott Odenbach House · District 31
R
Strong −
11% 44
Bobbi Andera
Bobbi Andera House · District 10
R
Strong −
17% 38
Tesa Schwans
Tesa Schwans House · District 9
R
Oppose
25% 46
Travis Ismay
Travis Ismay House · District 28B
R
Oppose
33% 44
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
33% 42
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All housing bills

signed · South Dakota · Senate Mar 30, 2026

SB 76: authorize loans from the South Dakota housing infrastructure fund for airport infrastructure.

SB 76 transfers unobligated funds from South Dakota's housing infrastructure fund to the revolving economic development fund. It authorizes the Board of Economic Development to provide up to $15 million in 0% interest loans to airports with scheduled air service located in metro areas with 125,000-275,000 residents (or over 275,000) as of the 2024 Census. Loans must be repaid over 20 years with the first payment due one year after funding, and must be fully funded by June 2030. The bill directly affects airports in designated metro areas seeking infrastructure improvements.
in committee · South Dakota · House Mar 2, 2026

HJR 5001: proposing and submitting to the voters at the next general election an amendment to the Constitution of the State of South Dakota, requiring a declaration of necessity and clarifying public use of private property taken or damaged by eminent domain.

This bill proposes a constitutional amendment that would prohibit South Dakota governments from using eminent domain to transfer private property to private companies or non-governmental entities solely for economic development or increased tax revenue. It would require any property transfer to serve a clear public purpose, such as infrastructure or public services, rather than benefiting private interests. The amendment would apply to all state and local government actions involving property takings and must be approved by voters at the next general election. If adopted, it would change how governments can acquire property for development projects.