Issue · Healthcare

Healthcare

Every healthcare bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
5
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Helene Duhamel
88% support rate
Top opponent
John Carley
29% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving healthcare in South Dakota

Legislators moving healthcare in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Helene Duhamel
Helene Duhamel Senate · District 32
R
Strong +
88% 26
Liz Larson
Liz Larson Senate · District 10
D
Strong +
86% 29
Jamie Smith
Jamie Smith Senate · District 15
D
Strong +
83% 41
Tim Reed
Tim Reed Senate · District 7
R
Strong +
82% 36
Scott Moore
Scott Moore House · District 23
R
Strong +
81% 52
John Carley
John Carley Senate · District 29
R
Oppose
29% 29
Bethany Soye
Bethany Soye House · District 9
R
Oppose
29% 19
Taffy Howard
Taffy Howard Senate · District 34
R
Oppose
31% 28
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Oppose
31% 40
Tony Randolph
Tony Randolph House · District 35
R
Oppose
35% 48
Showing 5 of 5 bills

All healthcare bills

signed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1274: prohibit the dispensing, distribution, sale, or advertisement of certain articles or things for purposes of an unlawful abortion and provide a criminal and civil penalty therefor.

HB 1274 prohibits the delivery or distribution of abortion-inducing medicine, drugs, or substances into South Dakota for purposes of an illegal abortion, with exceptions for self-administration by a pregnant person, life-saving medical procedures, or miscarriage management. It establishes a Class 6 felony for violating this prohibition, imposes civil penalties up to $10,000 per dose, and allows civil lawsuits for wrongful death of an unborn child by specific parties (e.g., parents, the pregnant person, or their estate). The bill directly affects medical providers, pharmacies, and anyone transporting such substances into the state, while exempting individuals acting in self-defense or under medical necessity. The attorney general may seek injunctions to stop violations and collect civil penalties for deposit into a state fund.
failed · South Dakota · House Mar 9, 2026

HB 1160: repeal the medical marijuana oversight committee.

HB 1160 repeals the legal requirement for a medical marijuana oversight committee in South Dakota. The bill ends a committee that was mandated to meet twice yearly to evaluate the medical cannabis program, including patient access, dispensary operations, testing facilities, and regulatory safeguards. This change removes the committee's structure and duties, which included making recommendations to the legislature about the program's effectiveness and regulations. The repeal applies to the medical cannabis program established under existing law.
in committee · South Dakota · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1068: authorize the dispensing of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine under a written protocol developed by a health care provider, and to provide liability protection therefor.

HB 1068 allows South Dakota pharmacists to dispense ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine to adults 18+ based on written protocols created by physicians. These protocols must include risk assessments, drug information (indications, usage, side effects), and instructions for handling adverse events. The law shields physicians and pharmacists from liability for good-faith compliance, except in cases of gross negligence or willful misconduct. It directly affects healthcare providers who dispense these drugs and patients receiving them under this new process.
passed · South Dakota · House Feb 5, 2026

HB 1112: modify the definition of an electronic smoking device.

HB 1112 modifies South Dakota's definition of "electronic smoking device" to explicitly include any device containing or delivering nicotine (or other substances with nicotine) intended for human consumption. This change clarifies that e-cigarettes, vape pens, e-cigars, and similar devices delivering nicotine fall under the definition, regardless of other substances they may contain. The amendment directly affects tobacco businesses selling these products and enforcement of existing laws regulating electronic smoking devices. The bill does not create new restrictions but ensures the definition aligns with how such devices are commonly used and marketed.
passed · South Dakota · House Jan 26, 2026

HB 1081: exempt certain individuals from, and require specific notice for, jury duty.

HB 1081 exempts certain healthcare providers, public safety workers, and caregivers from jury duty under specific conditions. Healthcare providers caring for pregnant patients or those with serious medical conditions can request exemption if their absence would cause patient hardship, such as uncontrolled pain or worsened health. Public safety workers (like police and EMTs) and individuals solely responsible for daily care of a permanently disabled household member may also be exempt if their absence risks public safety or the disabled person’s health. The bill also requires courts to notify jurors 14 days in advance of their required service date.