Issue · Environment

Environment

Every environment bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
2
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Nicole Uhre-Balk
100% support rate
Top opponent
Tina Mulally
12% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving environment in South Dakota

Legislators moving environment in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Nicole Uhre-Balk
Nicole Uhre-Balk House · District 32
D
Strong +
100% 24
Erik Muckey
Erik Muckey House · District 15
D
Strong +
100% 21
Scott Odenbach
Scott Odenbach House · District 31
R
Strong +
100% 22
Mary Fitzgerald
Mary Fitzgerald House · District 31
R
Strong +
100% 21
Marty Overweg
Marty Overweg House · District 21
R
Strong +
92% 32
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Strong −
12% 18
Aaron Aylward
Aaron Aylward House · District 6
R
Oppose
25% 20
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
29% 20
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Oppose
29% 21
Logan Manhart
Logan Manhart House · District 1
R
Mixed −
43% 21
Showing 2 of 2 bills

All environment bills

passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 18, 2026

SB 128: update provisions related to certain large-use customers of utilities.

SB 128 requires data centers (defined as facilities managing electronic data) to notify local water providers about projected water use and implement closed-loop cooling systems that limit net water withdrawal. It prohibits these facilities from exceeding water usage limits after residential and essential public services are allocated, and mandates reduced use during declared water shortages. Data centers must submit quarterly public reports detailing water usage and compliance. The bill directly affects large data center operators in South Dakota, focusing on sustainable water management for this growing sector.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 12, 2026

SB 148: terminate bounty payments for the control of nest predation.

This bill (SB 148) ends state funding for bounties paid to control wildlife that preys on bird nests. Specifically, it amends two laws (§ 40-36-9 and § 41-2-35) to prohibit using state funds from the Game, Fish and Parks department or animal damage control fund for bounties on animals like badgers, raccoons, skunks, or foxes when the purpose is nest predation control. The change directly affects how the Department of Game, Fish and Parks allocates its budget, stopping a specific funding mechanism for wildlife management. It does not alter wildlife management practices or create new programs - only removes authorization for this type of bounty payment.