Issue · Education

Education

Every education bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Jessica Bahmuller
89% support rate
Top opponent
Tony Randolph
33% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving education in South Dakota

Legislators moving education in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Jessica Bahmuller
Jessica Bahmuller House · District 19
R
Strong +
89% 55
Carl Perry
Carl Perry Senate · District 3
R
Strong +
85% 40
Curt Voight
Curt Voight Senate · District 33
R
Strong +
83% 54
Trish Ladner
Trish Ladner House · District 30
R
Strong +
82% 39
Red Dawn Foster
Red Dawn Foster Senate · District 27
D
Strong +
81% 39
Tony Randolph
Tony Randolph House · District 35
R
Oppose
33% 46
Greg Blanc
Greg Blanc Senate · District 35
R
Oppose
35% 39
Taffy Howard
Taffy Howard Senate · District 34
R
Oppose
38% 43
John Carley
John Carley Senate · District 29
R
Oppose
39% 46
Jana Hunt
Jana Hunt House · District 28A
R
Mixed −
41% 47
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All education bills

signed · South Dakota · House Mar 30, 2026

HB 1313: require education in prenatal human growth and development.

This bill requires South Dakota public schools to teach prenatal human growth and development in health or science classes using specific materials. It mandates that schools use resources recommended by the state Board of Education, including at least three minutes of high-definition ultrasound videos showing organ development or computer-generated animations of prenatal growth from fertilization to birth. The law prohibits using any materials from entities that perform, promote, or refer to abortion services. This directly affects K-12 public school curricula in South Dakota, altering required health/science content.
passed both · South Dakota · Senate Mar 2, 2026

SB 223: modify the requirements for a petition to refer an excess tax levy of a school district to a vote.

SB 223 modifies South Dakota's process for school districts to refer excess tax levies to voter approval. It changes the petition signature requirement from a flat 50 voters to "at least five percent of the registered voters" in the school district. The bill also adjusts notice rules, waiving newspaper publication requirements if the district mails the resolution to all property taxpayers within 20 days. This affects school districts seeking voter input on tax increases and directly impacts local taxpayers who may petition to refer levy decisions.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 20, 2026

SB 218: provide for the establishment of charter schools.

SB 218 establishes a legal framework for charter schools in South Dakota. It defines charter schools as public schools operating under contracts with school districts or the state education department, granting them exemptions from most state education laws while requiring compliance with civil rights, health/safety rules, and standardized testing. The bill mandates annual performance reporting to the state, outlines application requirements for nonprofit organizers (including community support and financial plans), and specifies that charter schools must serve grades K-12 nonsectarianly without religious instruction. This directly affects school districts (as authorizing entities), nonprofit organizers seeking to open charter schools, and students enrolled in these schools.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 17, 2026

SB 97: adjust a limit on the percentage increase in revenue payable from property taxes.

Senate Bill 97 adjusts property tax revenue limits for South Dakota taxing districts and school districts. For school districts, it changes the annual revenue increase cap from "lesser of 3% or index factor" to a flat 3% over the prior year's revenue, effective 2021. For general taxing districts, it adds a specific 3.5% cap on revenue increases above normal limits for taxes payable in 2027-2031. The bill also clarifies that property improvements to owner-occupied homes increasing value by 40% or less do not count toward the revenue limit. These changes directly affect local governments and school districts managing property tax revenue.