Issue · Budget & Taxes

Budget & Taxes

Every budget & taxes bill, vote, and legislator stance in South Dakota, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
14
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Peri Pourier
91% support rate
Top opponent
Tina Mulally
19% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving budget & taxes in South Dakota

Legislators moving budget & taxes in South Dakota
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Decisive votes
Peri Pourier
Peri Pourier House · District 27
R
Strong +
91% 44
Trish Ladner
Trish Ladner House · District 30
R
Strong +
90% 39
Chris Kassin
Chris Kassin House · District 17
R
Strong +
88% 67
Mike Derby
Mike Derby House · District 34
R
Strong +
88% 67
Greg Jamison
Greg Jamison House · District 12
R
Strong +
87% 47
Tina Mulally
Tina Mulally House · District 35
R
Strong −
19% 42
Phil Jensen
Phil Jensen House · District 33
R
Strong −
20% 55
Tony Randolph
Tony Randolph House · District 35
R
Oppose
27% 56
Dylan Jordan
Dylan Jordan House · District 4
R
Oppose
30% 50
Logan Manhart
Logan Manhart House · District 1
R
Oppose
35% 51
Showing 11–14 of 14 bills

All budget & taxes bills

passed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 24, 2026

SB 118: deposit certain tax revenues into a homeowner tax reduction fund.

SB 118 creates a "homeowner tax reduction fund" in South Dakota's state treasury. Each year by January 31st, the treasurer must deposit either $100 million or 0.3% of revenues collected from specific property taxes (chapters 10-45, 10-46, 10-46E, 10-58, and § 32-5B-20) into this fund. The Department of Revenue will use these funds to provide property tax rebates for owner-occupied single-family homes, with money in the fund not allowed to transfer to the general fund and requiring annual budgeting through the general appropriation bill. The bill takes effect July 1, 2027.
signed · South Dakota · House Feb 17, 2026

HB 1088: remove the requirement that counties remit to municipalities an amount equal to the road levy for calendar years 1984, 1985, and 1986.

HB 1088 removes a requirement that South Dakota counties must remit funds to municipalities equal to the road levy amounts distributed to those municipalities for calendar years 1984, 1985, and 1986. This specifically targets a provision in existing law that mandated counties pay municipalities a share of road tax revenue from those three years. The bill repeals Section 10-12-32.1, which previously established that municipalities incorporated after January 1, 1984, were entitled to 25% of county road funds for those historical years. This change eliminates a longstanding financial obligation between counties and municipalities for a specific historical period.
failed · South Dakota · Senate Feb 17, 2026

SB 187: define nonpublic school.

SB 187 defines "nonpublic school" in South Dakota law as an institution operated by individuals or groups (not publicly elected boards) that teaches math and English fundamentals to children of compulsory school age, with English instruction focused on mastery. The bill specifies that such schools may limit enrollment, charge tuition, receive grants or services from school districts, but cannot claim geographic territory for tax revenue or receive state education aid under Chapter 13-13. It also clarifies that nonpublic schools are not required to be accredited or have certified teachers. This definition applies to all nonpublic schools in South Dakota, establishing their legal boundaries for funding and operations.
passed · South Dakota · Senate Jan 15, 2026

SCR 601: encouraging honest economic development rooted in the republican principles of limited government, deregulation, and organic entrepreneurial growth.

SCR 601 is a symbolic Senate Concurrent Resolution (not a binding law) introduced by Senator Carley. It urges South Dakota to pursue economic policies aligned with "free market principles," emphasizing limited government, deregulation, and low taxes over tax incentives or subsidies for businesses. The resolution argues that government should only protect rights and avoid competing with private enterprise, instead focusing on "organic entrepreneurial growth." It directly affects state legislative and executive policy development by advocating for a specific philosophical approach to economic growth.
Showing 11 to 14 of 14 bills