Home › South Dakota › Bills
Bills

South Dakota Congressional Bills

Browse federal bills sponsored by your state's delegation.

Bill results

in committee · South Dakota · Senate Jun 22, 2023

SJRES 36: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs of the Department of Labor relating to "Rescission of Implementing Legal Requirements Regarding the Equal Opportunity Clause's Religious Exemption Rule".

This joint resolution (SJRES 36) seeks congressional disapproval of a Department of Labor rule (88 Fed. Reg. 12842, March 1, 2023) that would have removed religious exemption provisions from the Equal Opportunity Clause requirements for federal contractors. If approved, it would prevent the rule from taking effect, meaning federal contractors would continue to be required to comply with the Equal Opportunity Clause without the religious exemption previously allowed. The bill directly affects federal contractors subject to the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs' (OFCCP) regulations. It is a procedural disapproval measure under Title 5, U.S. Code, not a new policy change.
James Lankford (R) · 25 co-sponsors
vetoed · South Dakota · Senate Jun 22, 2023

SJRES 11: A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "Control of Air Pollution From New Motor Vehicles: Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards".

SJRES 11 is a joint resolution seeking to cancel an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rule that set new emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles, including trucks and buses. The rule, published in the Federal Register on January 24, 2023, would have required manufacturers to meet specific pollution control measures for new vehicles. This resolution uses a congressional disapproval process under the Congressional Review Act to nullify the EPA rule, meaning it would have no legal effect if enacted. If passed, the EPA's emissions standards for heavy-duty vehicles would be voided, removing requirements for manufacturers to comply with those specific pollution controls.
Deb Fischer (R) · 37 co-sponsors
failed · South Dakota · House Jun 22, 2023

HJRES 44: Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives relating to "Factoring Criteria for Firearms with Attached 'Stabilizing Braces'".

HJRES 44 is a congressional resolution seeking to block a 2021 rule by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF). The rule classified firearms with stabilizing braces as "short-barreled rifles," which would have required additional licensing and regulation. This resolution uses a specific legal process (under Title 5, U.S. Code) to formally disapprove the ATF rule, meaning the rule would no longer be in effect. It directly affects firearm owners, manufacturers, and dealers who would have been subject to the rule’s requirements.
Andrew S. Clyde (R) · 188 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · Senate Jun 22, 2023

S 2210: Iran Sanctions Relief Review Act

S 2210, the Iran Sanctions Relief Review Act, requires the President to submit a detailed report to Congress before terminating, waiving, or significantly altering U.S. sanctions on Iran. Congress then has 30 days (or 60 days during summer months) to review the proposal through committee hearings and decide whether to approve or disapprove it via joint resolution. During this review period, the President cannot implement the sanction change without Congressional approval. The bill directly affects the executive branch's ability to modify Iran sanctions policy and gives Congress formal oversight authority over major foreign policy shifts related to Iran.
Bill Hagerty (R) · 40 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · Senate Jun 22, 2023

S 2174: Department of Veterans Affairs Minor Construction Threshold Adjustment Act of 2023

This bill raises the funding threshold for minor construction projects at VA medical facilities from $20 million to $30 million. It requires the VA Secretary to adjust this amount every two years based on inflation, construction costs, and other economic factors, using either existing or new calculation methods. Projects under $30 million will now qualify as "minor" construction, streamlining approval processes without changing the actual construction work. The adjustment mechanism ensures the threshold remains aligned with current construction market conditions.
Jon Tester (D) · 4 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · Senate Jun 21, 2023

S 2085: Medicare Multi-Cancer Early Detection Screening Coverage Act

This bill adds multi-cancer early detection screening tests to Medicare Part B coverage, directly affecting Medicare beneficiaries. It creates a new coverage category for FDA-approved blood tests (like those analyzing cell-free DNA) that screen for multiple cancer types simultaneously, as defined in the bill. Medicare would cover these tests once every 12 months, and the bill clarifies that this change does not impact existing coverage for standard cancer screenings like mammograms or colonoscopies. The policy change ensures beneficiaries can access these new screening options without unnecessary delays after FDA approval.
Mike Crapo (R) · 64 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · House Jun 21, 2023

HR 4245: Enforce the Caps Act

HR 4245, the "Enforce the Caps Act," sets specific annual spending limits for discretionary federal programs from fiscal years 2026 through 2029. It establishes new budget authority caps at $1.622 trillion for 2026, increasing to $1.671 trillion for 2029. The bill directly affects how Congress allocates funds for non-mandatory programs like education, transportation, and defense by legally binding these spending levels. This is a procedural adjustment to existing budget control law, not a new policy affecting specific groups or creating new programs.
Glenn Grothman (R) · 15 co-sponsors
passed · South Dakota · House Jun 21, 2023

HR 277: Regulations from the Executive in Need of Scrutiny Act of 2023

HR 277 would require Congress to approve major federal regulations before they take effect. Major rules are defined as those with significant economic impact ($100 million+ annually), major cost increases for consumers or industries, or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, or innovation. Agencies must submit detailed information about these rules to Congress, including cost-benefit analyses, before they can take effect. Congress would have 70 session days to approve the rule with a joint resolution; if they don't act within that timeframe, the rule would not take effect. This would increase congressional oversight of federal regulations and require more detailed information about proposed rules before they become law.
Kat Cammack (R) · 182 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · House Jun 20, 2023

HR 4196: One Flag for All Act

This bill bans displaying any flag other than the U.S. flag on the exterior or in hallways of public buildings, including government offices, military installations, and embassies. Exceptions allow specific flags like POW/MIA memorials, visiting diplomats' national flags, a member of Congress's home state flag, military unit flags, tribal flags, or local jurisdiction flags. It directly affects how public buildings display flags, requiring exclusive use of the U.S. flag in designated areas. The bill applies to all public buildings under federal definition, with limited exceptions for historical, diplomatic, or local displays.
Diana Harshbarger (R) · 13 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · House Jun 16, 2023

HR 4076: United States-Israel Health Technologies Cooperation Act

HR 4076 establishes a joint U.S.-Israel program to fund health technology development, authorizing $4 million annually (2024-2026) through the U.S. Health and Human Services Department. It requires Israel to match U.S. funding and focuses on collaborative projects in artificial intelligence, vaccines, telemedicine, diagnostic tests, and data-driven personalized medicine for emerging infectious diseases. The program can either build on an existing U.S.-Israel agreement or create a new one under a 2008 science cooperation framework. This bill directly affects U.S. federal health agencies and the Israeli government, with funds restricted to joint projects meeting specific technological and health priorities.
Chris Pappas (D) · 67 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · Senate Jun 15, 2023

SRES 254: A resolution unequivocally condemning antisemitism and lauding the working definition of antisemitism of the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.

SRES 254 is a 2023 Senate resolution that symbolically condemns antisemitism and endorses the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) widely adopted working definition of antisemitism. It urges U.S. federal, state, and local governments, along with academic institutions and civil society groups, to use the IHRA definition as a standard tool for identifying and addressing antisemitism. The resolution specifically highlights examples of antisemitism, such as Holocaust denial, conspiracy theories about Jewish control, and blaming Jewish communities for Israel's actions. As a non-binding resolution, it does not create new laws or directly affect any group but formally supports the IHRA definition's global use in combating antisemitism.
Rick Scott (R) · 4 co-sponsors
in committee · South Dakota · Senate Jun 15, 2023

S 2005: Mandatory Materiality Requirement Act of 2023

S 2005, the Mandatory Materiality Requirement Act of 2023, would require the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to specify in new disclosure rules that public companies must only disclose information the company determines is important for investment decisions. The bill amends the Securities Acts of 1933 and 1934 to mandate that the SEC explicitly state in rulemaking that disclosure obligations apply only when information is material - meaning a reasonable investor would consider its omission significant to their decision. This applies to all SEC rulemaking on disclosure requirements for public companies, though it excludes rules that would reduce disclosure burdens. The bill does not change current disclosure standards but alters how future SEC rules must be structured.
Mike Rounds (R) · 9 co-sponsors
Showing 1,093 to 1,104 of 2,152 bills
Previous 1 … 91 92 93 … 180 Next