Home South Carolina Elections 2026 Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Democratic candidate · 2026 general election · South Carolina

AL

Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Democratic

Races

Campaign finance

FEC data through Jun 30, 2026. Covering the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Possibly out of date. last refreshed 2026-08-20

The 2026 cycle at a glance

Total receipts
$10,804,041
Everything the campaign took in
Individual contributions
$10,677,210
Itemized and unitemized split not reported
PAC and other committees
$104,955
Received from political committees
Campaign spending
$6,684,746
Total disbursements
Cash on hand
$4,119,295
At the end of the reporting period

Where the money came from

These categories divide total receipts of $10,804,041 exactly once, so they add back up to the reported total.

Receipts by funding category for the 2026 cycle
Source Amount Share of receipts
Individual contributions $10,677,210 98.8%
PAC and other committee contributions $104,955 1.0%
Party committee contributions $0 0.0%
Candidate self-funding $0 0.0%
Loans $0 0.0%
Other receipts, including transfers $21,876 0.2%
Total receipts $10,804,041 100%

Financial position

Cash, debt, refunds, loans, and transfers as reported through Jun 30, 2026 for the 2026 cycle. These are factual reported values, not a judgement about whether a campaign is healthy, viable, or strong. Independent expenditures are never added to or subtracted from any of them: that money was never the campaign's.

Reported financial position for the 2026 cycle
Measure Amount
Cash on hand at coverage end $4,119,295
Debts and obligations owed by the committee $1,025,357
Debts and obligations owed to the committee Not reported
Contributions refunded to individuals $41,262
Contributions refunded to committees $0
Transfers received from other authorized committeesAlready raised money moving between the candidate's own committees, not new fundraising. $18,914
Transfers made to other authorized committees $9,075
Repayments of candidate loans $0
Repayments of other loans $0

Calculated from the reported values

Each row below is arithmetic MyRepTracker performed on the values above. Where the FEC published the figure itself, the row says so and no calculation was made.

Values calculated from the reported financial position, with the formula for each
Measure Amount How it was produced
Contributions net of refunds $10,740,903 Calculated as individual + committee + party + candidate contributions, minus contributions refunded to individuals and committees.
Operating expenditures net of offsets Not reported An input this calculation needs is not published by the source behind this record.
Outstanding candidate loans $0 Calculated as loans received from the candidate minus repayments of those loans.
Other outstanding loans $0 Calculated as other loans received minus repayments of those loans.
Total contributions refunded $41,262 Calculated as refunds to individuals plus refunds to committees.

Change since the previous filing

Both columns come from committee C00906024, so the two periods are comparable. A change is the difference between what 12P 2026 reported and what Q2 2026 reported, and the direction is stated in words rather than shown only as a sign. 12P 2026 reported through May 20, 2026 and Q2 2026 through Jun 30, 2026.

Financial position at the two most recent controlling filings of committee C00906024
Measure 12P 2026Reported through May 20, 2026 Q2 2026Reported through Jun 30, 2026 Change
Cash on hand at period end $2,865,309 $4,119,295 Up $1,253,986
Debts owed by the committee $0 $1,025,357 Up $1,025,357
Contribution refunds in the period $4,065 $6,378 Up $2,313

Cash compared with one period's spending

Cash on hand of $4,119,295 set beside the $1,490,350 this campaign spent during Q2 2026, through Jun 30, 2026, which is 2.8 times that period's spending. This is a ratio between two reported numbers over one named period. It is not a forecast of how long the money will last, and campaigns do not spend evenly across a cycle.

Outside spending

Independent expenditures are spending by other organizations that is not coordinated with the campaign. This money was never received or controlled by Anne Lintzenich Andrews. Supporting and opposing spending are kept apart rather than combined into one number, and neither is added to campaign receipts.

Spent supporting

$0
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

Spent opposing

$140,756
Independent expenditures in the 2026 cycle

What the money was spent on

These spending categories were produced by taxonomy spend-1.2 and the current rules are spend-1.3, so they are withheld until this record is refreshed.

Political committees that contributed directly

Money received by the authorized campaign committee from PACs and other political committees. This is not outside spending.

This total will usually differ from the PAC figure in the summary above. The summary is what the campaign reported receiving in total; this ranking adds up the individual contributions that were itemized, which is a different record made at a different time. Neither is a correction of the other, and the gap is not an error in either one.

All 24 shown $126,000 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Political committees ranked by direct contributions
Rank Committee Amount Share Transactions Last activity
1 314 ACTION FUND C00633248 $19,500 15.5% 4 Jun 4, 2026
2 EMILYS LIST C00193433 $10,000 7.9% 2 Jun 25, 2026
3 AMERICAN MOBILIZATION PAC C00459925 $10,000 7.9% 2 Jun 5, 2026
4 VOTE MAMA C00692137 $10,000 7.9% 3 Nov 3, 2025
5 LIFTOFF PAC C00785816 $10,000 7.9% 3 Jun 29, 2026
6 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE C00007542 $5,000 4.0% 1 Oct 14, 2025
7 INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE C00027342 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 23, 2026
8 NATIONAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE / AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS C00140061 $5,000 4.0% 1 Dec 10, 2025
9 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF OB-GYNS PAC (OB-GYN PAC) C00364158 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 8, 2026
10 M-PAC C00365270 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 8, 2026
11 PURPOSE PAC C00497131 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 29, 2026
12 COMMON GROUND PAC C00538835 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 17, 2026
13 I GOT YOUR BACK PAC C00633156 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 9, 2026
14 CACHE PAC C00831545 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 25, 2026
15 IN THIS TOGETHER PAC C00864785 $5,000 4.0% 1 Jun 23, 2026
16 MARK KELLY FOR SENATE C00696526 $4,000 3.2% 2 Dec 30, 2025
17 HEALTHCARE FOR ACTION PAC C00822536 $3,500 2.8% 1 Aug 12, 2025
18 JOINT ACTION COMMITTEE FOR POLITICAL AFFAIRS C00139659 $2,500 2.0% 1 Apr 22, 2026
19 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (FAMMEDPAC) C00411553 $2,500 2.0% 1 Sep 25, 2025
20 DEMOCRATS UNITED TO CHANGE AND HOPE PAC C00448001 $2,500 2.0% 1 Jun 3, 2025
21 ELIZABETH COLBERT BUSCH FOR CONGRESS C00541243 $1,000 0.8% 1 Jun 3, 2025
22 CONGRESS MAJORITY PAC C00890889 $250 0.2% 1 May 23, 2026
23 ENGAGE Y'ALL PAC C00847137 $200 0.2% 1 Jun 10, 2025
24 LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS ACTION FUND C00252940 $50 0.0% 1 Mar 13, 2026

Organizations spending independently

Supporting Anne Lintzenich Andrews

No supporting independent expenditures are reported for this cycle.

Opposing Anne Lintzenich Andrews

1 organization shown $140,756 total

Itemized rows as published by the FEC on Aug 16, 2026. The summary figures above come from the candidate's own reports through the coverage date.

Organizations ranked by independent spending opposing this candidate
Rank Committee Amount Share Transactions Last activity
1 Security Is Strength PAC C00573733 $140,756 100.0% 5 Jul 14, 2026

What that outside spending purchased

Each independent expenditure carries a short description the spending committee wrote, and these categories are those descriptions sorted under taxonomy outside-1.0. Spending supporting Anne Lintzenich Andrews and spending opposing them are broken down separately and never combined, and every share below is a share of that one direction's total.

The largest category is usually "Advertising, medium not specified". That is not a leftover: it is spending the committee described only as a media buy or as advertising, without saying whether it aired on television, ran online, or arrived in the mail. MyRepTracker reports what was filed rather than assigning it a medium.

Supporting Anne Lintzenich Andrews

No independent expenditures in this direction are reported for this cycle.

Opposing Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Independent spending opposing this candidate, by reported purpose for the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Purpose Amount % Share Transactions
Digital and online advertising $140,756 100.0% 5
Classified $140,756 100.0%
Unclassified filing descriptions $0 0.0%
Total independent spending $140,756 100% 5

Who the committees behind this money were

Every committee here is placed by the registration it filed with the FEC for the 2026 cycle: its designation, its committee type, and the organizational form it reported. That is the FEC's own record and involves no judgement by MyRepTracker, so this covers every itemized dollar. A committee's registration can change between cycles, and each cycle is judged by its own.

Contributed to Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Committees itemized $126,000 in contributions to this campaign.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committee Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Non-connected committees $53,250 42.3% 8 14
Leadership PACs $47,500 37.7% 8 11
Membership organization PACs $10,050 8.0% 3 3
Labor union PACs $10,000 7.9% 2 2
Other candidates' committees $5,200 4.1% 3 4
Itemized total for this direction $126,000

Spent opposing Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Committees itemized $140,756 in independent spending opposing Anne Lintzenich Andrews.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by who the FEC says runs them in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Kind of committee Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Non-connected committees $140,756 100.0% 1 5
Itemized total for this direction $140,756

What interests those committees advance

The FEC publishes no industry or interest field, so unlike the section above this one is a claim MyRepTracker makes. A committee is placed here only when there is a document behind the claim that a reader can open: its own statement of organization, its own published mission statement, or a named third party. Every assignment carries that document on the committee's own page. A committee's name is never evidence of anything.

Categorized is not the same as reviewed. Most of these sectors were assigned by machine from the committee's own filing rather than read by a person. Each committee's own page says which of the two its assignment is, and names the document behind it either way.

Coverage is partial on purpose, and the part that is not covered is shown at full size rather than left out. Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees are excluded outright: their giving is an officeholder's or a party's decision, so no interest label describes it. Categories are taxonomy interest-1.7.

Contributed to Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Committees itemized $126,000 in contributions to this campaign. $52,700 of that came from leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees, which are not interest groups. Of the remaining $73,300, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $42,000 and committees not yet categorized account for $31,300.

Political committees contributing to this campaign, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Interest Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Pro-Democratic Party Ideological and single-issue $19,500 26.6% 1 4
Physicians and medical specialties Health $12,500 17.1% 3 3
Building trades unions Labor $5,000 6.8% 1 1
Transportation unions Labor $5,000 6.8% 1 1
Leadership PACs, party committees, and other candidates' committees Not part of the base the shares beside it are taken over. $52,700 Not applicable 11 15
Committees not yet categorized $31,300 42.7% 7 10
Base the shares are taken over $73,300 100%
Itemized total for this direction $126,000

Spent opposing Anne Lintzenich Andrews

Committees itemized $140,756 in independent spending opposing Anne Lintzenich Andrews. Of that, committees categorized as advancing an interest account for $0 and committees not yet categorized account for $140,756.

Independent spenders opposing this candidate, grouped by the interest they are categorized as advancing in the 2026 cycle, ranked by amount
Interest Amount % Share Committees Transactions
Committees not yet categorized $140,756 100.0% 1 5
Base the shares are taken over $140,756 100%
Itemized total for this direction $140,756

Last-minute contributions reported before an election

In the days just before an election, a campaign must tell the FEC within 48 hours about any contribution or loan of $1,000 or more. These notices arrive faster than the regular reporting schedule, and the same money is reported again in the report covering those days. Nothing here is added to receipts: it is a preview of money the ordinary reports will carry, not money beside them.

Reported on notices

$132,500
Across 7 notices, received May 21, 2026 to Jun 3, 2026

Still only provisional

$0
Every notice is now covered by a regular report

The most recent notice was filed on Jun 5, 2026. A notice stops being the only record of its money once a regular report covers the same days; those are marked reconciled below and the amounts appear in Anne Lintzenich Andrews's reported totals through the ordinary schedule.

48-hour notices filed for the 2026 cycle, newest first
Filed Amount Entries Covers State Filing
Jun 5, 2026 $24,000 15 Jun 3 to Jun 3, 2026 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Jun 3, 2026 $1,000 1 Jun 2 to Jun 2, 2026 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
Jun 1, 2026 $63,500 42 May 31 to May 31, 2026 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
May 30, 2026 $18,000 8 May 28 to May 28, 2026 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
May 26, 2026 $13,000 10 May 24 to May 24, 2026 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
May 24, 2026 $8,000 3 May 22 to May 22, 2026 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗
May 22, 2026 $5,000 1 May 21 to May 21, 2026 Covered by a regular report FEC filing ↗

Where the individual money was reported from

Contributions from individuals that the campaign itemized, grouped by the state each contributor gave as their address. Contributions of $200 or less in aggregate are not itemized and carry no address, so they are not here at all. These places account for $4,198,968 of the $10,696,124 this campaign reported from individuals and from transfers by its other authorized committees, across 31,460 itemized contributions.

From South Carolina

$1,677,595
40.0% of the itemized money that has a place

From everywhere else

$2,520,873
60.0% of the itemized money that has a place

Money from outside South Carolina is not money from outside the country, and neither figure is evidence that anything unlawful happened. People may contribute to campaigns in states they do not live in, and United States citizens living abroad may contribute at all.

What kind of place it came from

Itemized individual contributions by kind of place, 2026 cycle
Kind of place Amount Contributions Share
States and the District of ColumbiaContributors who gave an address in one of the fifty states or the District of Columbia. $4,193,568 31,444 99.9%
United States territoriesPuerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands. $1,150 7 <0.1%
Armed Forces addressesMilitary mailing addresses used by service members stationed away from home. They are real addresses; they are simply not states. $1,250 3 <0.1%
Addresses outside the United StatesContributors who gave an address abroad. United States citizens living overseas may contribute, and this figure is not evidence that anyone gave unlawfully. $2,500 5 0.1%
Not placedContributions the FEC could not attribute to a place. They are reported here and are never assigned to a state or counted in the in-state and out-of-state split. $500 1 Not counted

Places, largest first

Top 10 of 56 places shown as bars. Every place is in the table below.

  • South Carolina this campaign's state $1,677,595
  • California $443,484
  • New York $256,799
  • Massachusetts $206,007
  • Florida $126,029
  • North Carolina $121,961
  • Illinois $104,612
  • Pennsylvania $97,715
  • Texas $93,840
  • Washington $92,989
Every place with itemized individual contributions reported for the 2026 cycle
Place Amount Contributions Share
South Carolina this campaign's state $1,677,595 10,683 40.0%
California $443,484 3,436 10.6%
New York $256,799 1,190 6.1%
Massachusetts $206,007 1,042 4.9%
Florida $126,029 1,113 3.0%
North Carolina $121,961 1,169 2.9%
Illinois $104,612 813 2.5%
Pennsylvania $97,715 743 2.3%
Texas $93,840 1,030 2.2%
Washington $92,989 919 2.2%
Maryland $90,598 538 2.2%
Ohio $85,834 597 2.0%
Virginia $81,164 608 1.9%
Colorado $79,933 548 1.9%
Georgia $64,694 460 1.5%
Tennessee $58,742 438 1.4%
Connecticut $52,675 338 1.3%
District of Columbia $45,866 185 1.1%
New Jersey $43,391 348 1.0%
Arizona $33,796 494 0.8%
Indiana $29,046 331 0.7%
Minnesota $26,866 451 0.6%
Oregon $25,124 330 0.6%
Michigan $24,799 505 0.6%
Wisconsin $18,827 376 0.4%
Missouri $18,081 245 0.4%
Maine $16,117 168 0.4%
Kentucky $15,623 196 0.4%
Louisiana $15,347 110 0.4%
New Hampshire $15,160 77 0.4%
New Mexico $14,051 300 0.3%
Nevada $13,278 183 0.3%
Alabama $10,302 109 0.2%
Utah $9,651 103 0.2%
Rhode Island $7,933 129 0.2%
Oklahoma $7,345 141 0.2%
Mississippi $7,276 32 0.2%
Idaho $7,037 113 0.2%
Iowa $6,626 97 0.2%
Kansas $5,763 123 0.1%
Alaska $5,536 43 0.1%
Arkansas $5,295 61 0.1%
Delaware $5,080 87 0.1%
Vermont $4,696 77 0.1%
Hawaii $4,270 75 0.1%
Nebraska $4,075 37 0.1%
Montana $3,186 67 0.1%
West Virginia $2,807 61 0.1%
Wyoming $2,734 35 0.1%
South Dakota $2,682 57 0.1%
Foreign countries $2,500 5 0.1%
Armed Forces Europe $1,250 3 <0.1%
North Dakota $1,231 33 <0.1%
Virgin Islands $1,000 1 <0.1%
Not reported not placed $500 1 Not counted
Puerto Rico $150 6 <0.1%
Reported with a place $4,198,468 31,459 100%

Contributions are transactions, not people: one contributor giving every month is counted once for each contribution. No contributor's name, address, employer, or occupation is stored or shown anywhere on this site.

  • $500 could not be attributed to a place and is left out of the in-state and out-of-state figures rather than assigned to a state.

How this compares

Compared with U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle: 410 campaigns with a complete Federal Election Commission record for the cycle, out of 419 on file. This is a position in that group, not a score, a grade, or a judgement about the campaign.

Total receipts

Everything the authorized campaign committee took in for this cycle, including contributions, loans, and transfers.

  • This campaign $10,804,041
  • Cohort median $216,860
Total receipts for this campaign and for U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $10,804,041
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$17,760
Median$216,860
75th percentile$2,269,114
Highest in the cohort$77,279,766
Campaigns counted 410

382 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 93th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Share of receipts from political committees

Direct contributions from PACs and other political committees as a share of total receipts. Campaigns reporting no receipts at all have no share and are left out of this measure.

  • This campaign 1.0%
  • Cohort median 0.4%
Share of receipts from political committees for this campaign and for U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign 1.0%
Lowest in the cohort0.0%
25th percentile0.0%
Median0.4%
75th percentile7.0%
Highest in the cohort88.0%
Campaigns counted 384

214 of the 384 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 56th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Cash on hand

The balance reported at the end of the coverage period. Campaigns report at different times, so this compares balances as of each campaign's own coverage end.

  • This campaign $4,119,295
  • Cohort median $14,751
Cash on hand for this campaign and for U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $4,119,295
Lowest in the cohort-$16,841
25th percentile$356
Median$14,751
75th percentile$1,192,514
Highest in the cohort$42,587,451
Campaigns counted 410

368 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 90th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending supporting

Independent expenditures by other organizations supporting the candidate. This money was never received or controlled by the campaign.

  • This campaign $0
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending supporting for this campaign and for U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $0
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$33,915,827
Campaigns counted 410

0 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 0th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

Outside spending opposing

Independent expenditures by other organizations opposing the candidate, not coordinated with any campaign.

  • This campaign $140,756
  • Cohort median $0
Outside spending opposing for this campaign and for U.S. Senate campaigns nationwide, 2026 cycle
Measure Value
This campaign $140,756
Lowest in the cohort$0
25th percentile$0
Median$0
75th percentile$0
Highest in the cohort$25,490,183
Campaigns counted 410

363 of the 410 campaigns counted reported less than this one, which puts it at the 89th percentile of the cohort. Campaigns reporting the same value sit at the same position.

  • 9 of the 419 campaigns on file for this cohort have no complete record for the cycle and are not counted in any figure here.

Every comparison is drawn from one two-year cycle and one office. Only campaigns whose FEC record for that cycle is complete are counted; the rest are reported beside the cohort and are never counted as zero. One authorized committee is counted once however many candidacies report it, so where a candidate's committees are all reported by another FEC record, that record supplies the figures for both. A campaign is never compared with another cycle, with a career total, or with a candidate for a different office.

What these numbers mean

Receipts are not the same as contributions
Total receipts include everything the campaign took in, such as contributions, loans, and transfers. Contributions are only the money given by people and committees.
Direct contributions are not outside spending
A direct contribution is money received by the campaign's own authorized committee. An independent expenditure is money another organization spent on its own, without coordinating with the campaign. The Federal Election Commission treats these as different activities, and so does this page.
The organizations named here are political committees
Direct rankings count what one political committee gave to a campaign; outside-spending rankings count what a committee spent independently. A separate conduit section groups individual contributions only when the campaign's memo record supplies a registered conduit committee's FEC ID. It never attributes donors to employers or interest groups, and it never exposes contributor names. Sites using broader attribution rules may therefore report different organization totals.
A cycle may be only partly reported
Filings arrive throughout a two-year cycle. A current cycle shows only what has been filed and processed through the coverage date shown above, so it is not comparable with a finished cycle.
This view is cycle specific
It covers the 2026 two-year cycle only.

Source: Federal Election Commission ↗. MyRepTracker ingests FEC records directly and does not add its own influence, risk, or corruption score.