Issue · Housing

Housing

Every housing bill, vote, and legislator stance in Oklahoma, automatically classified by Maddy, our AI policy reader.

Total bills
4
2026 Regular Session
Top supporter
Robert Manger
96% support rate
Top opponent
Tom Gann
26% support rate
Ranked legislators
10
5 support · 5 oppose
Key legislators

Who's moving housing in Oklahoma

Legislators moving housing in Oklahoma
Legislator Party Stance Support rate Votes
Robert Manger
Robert Manger House · District 101
R
Strong +
96% 155
Clay Staires
Clay Staires House · District 66
R
Strong +
93% 112
Brian Hill
Brian Hill House · District 47
R
Strong +
86% 129
Nicole Miller
Nicole Miller House · District 82
R
Strong +
86% 137
John Pfeiffer
John Pfeiffer House · District 38
R
Strong +
84% 143
Tom Gann
Tom Gann House · District 8
R
Oppose
26% 136
Aletia Timmons
Aletia Timmons House · District 97
D
Oppose
27% 67
Molly Jenkins
Molly Jenkins House · District 33
R
Oppose
30% 134
Roland Pederson
Roland Pederson Senate · District 19
R
Oppose
31% 121
Gabe Woolley
Gabe Woolley House · District 98
R
Oppose
33% 148
Showing 4 of 4 bills

All housing bills

failed · Oklahoma · House May 7, 2026

HB 2115: Public assistance programs; directing the Department of Human Services to administer certain programs; federal funds; requirements; transferring certain powers, duties, records, assets and monies to the Department; effective date.

HB 2115 transfers administration of Oklahoma's Energy Conservation Assistance Fund from the Department of Commerce to the Department of Human Services. It provides grants of up to $3,000 for weatherization work (like insulation, storm windows, and structural repairs) to low-income elderly and handicapped homeowners who meet income guidelines (125% of federal poverty level). The bill requires an energy audit before grants are issued, prioritizes applicants with greatest need, and establishes a revolving fund for ongoing program funding. This directly affects qualifying homeowners seeking energy efficiency improvements to their primary residences.
vetoed · Oklahoma · Senate May 13, 2025

SB 333: Oklahoma Housing Authorities Act; modifying definition.

SB 333 amends Oklahoma's Housing Authorities Act to update the definition of "area of operation" for city housing authorities. It specifically allows active, certified city housing authorities to use American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) for projects anywhere in the state until December 31, 2027, provided they consult with the city, county, and other housing authorities in the project area. This change applies only to ARPA/SLFRF-funded projects and does not alter existing boundaries for other housing initiatives. The amendment becomes effective November 1, 2025.
vetoed · Oklahoma · Senate May 5, 2025

SB 128: Forcible entry and detainer; extending time period for certain appearance; increasing time period for service of summons. Effective date.

SB 128 extends the required notice period for eviction cases (forcible entry and detainer) in Oklahoma from 3 days to 7 days before the court hearing for most cases, while maintaining a 3-day requirement for emergency evictions under specific subsections of Oklahoma law. It also updates summons language to be plain and understandable, requires public access to the summons form via the court website, and makes certain legal terms gender-neutral. The bill would have affected tenants and landlords in eviction proceedings by giving defendants more time to prepare. However, this bill was vetoed by the Governor on May 5, 2025, and is not currently law.
passed · Oklahoma · Senate Apr 1, 2025

SB 484: Municipalities; prohibiting approval of certain facility within certain locations. Emergency.

SB 484 prohibits municipalities with populations under 300,000 (per the latest federal census) from approving new schools, shelters, or homeless shelters operated within places of worship near existing schools, hospitals, or government buildings. The bill directly affects smaller Oklahoma cities and towns by restricting where certain facilities can be built. Key provisions remove ambiguous language about "property" and explicitly include homeless shelters in places of worship within the prohibited locations. This creates a clear geographic restriction to prevent new facilities from being sited adjacent to existing community infrastructure.